What is the nature of gender in these two plays? Do you see gender as a fixed and prescribed construct with set rules and expectations for “male” and “female,” or do you see here a more fluid and flexible stage, where gender is “performed,” where “masculinity” and “feminitity” are simply roles to be played as situations and contexts dictate?
Incorporate your own fine ideas about Henry VI part 3 and Richard III concerning character development, plotting, scene-work, language, conventions, situations.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]