Older Peer Mentoring Among Gifted African American Male High School Students: A Qualitative Case Study
It also must include a review of at least 30 current peer-reviewed (journal) sources. “Current” means that the study was conducted within the last 3-5 (perhaps stretching to 7) years. Anything older than that should be a recognized classic in the field or replaced with an updated source. Both your Committee Member and I mentioned this during our last review. The remainder of the issues (some of which were also mentioned in the previous review), such as the format of the References, are much quicker fixes. Please read carefully and resubmit when the issues have been addressed.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]