Under what conditions is the use of force legally allowed in International Relations: the comparative analysis of the Russian actions in Georgia (2008) and Ukraine (2014).
I need a multidisciplinary approach to this essay (mix of International Law, International Relations and East European Studies). Also, I usually go with pretty concise “male” style of writing, so, please, less poetics and more facts, analysis and causal-consequential inferences. The structure, as I see it:
Intro (~half a page-1 page) -> Literature review (the theoretical framework of the question, review of the key documents and international agreements, treaty and customary law rules re the question, ~2 pages) -> Main argument and findings (theoretic comparative analysis of the 2 case studies and empirical analysis whether there was a breach of Intl law and custom in the 2 cases, ~3-4 pages) – Conclusion (~half a page).
I have summaries of a number of sources related to the use of force in Intl law, let me know if the writer needs them (Ian Brownlie, ‘Principles of public intl law’, ch. 33 – The use of threat of force by States; JAMES A. GREEN, ‘The Intl Court of Justice and Self-Defence in Intl. Law’, Ch. 1.2 – Facts and rulings of the primary cases, 9-22, Ch.2 – The criteria of necessity and proportionality; C.BJOLA, ‘Legitimating the use of force in Intl Politics:Kosovo, Iraq and the ethics of intervention’, Ch.5 – Humanitarianism revisited: the NATO intervention in Kosovo; R.BURKE, ‘Status of forces deployed on UN peacekeeping operations:Jurisdictional Immunity’; C.J.BORGEN ‘The language of law and the practice of politics:great powers and the rhetoric of self-determination in the cases of Kosovo and South Ossetia’, UN ‘A more secure world: our shared responsibility, 2005.
The formal requirement is the minimum of 15 sources not counting the primary sources (treaties, agreements, documents, etc.)
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]