[Topic: How can theory help to improve project management practice?]
It must be adopted critical thinking process, not only for listing knowledge and references.
Choose some specific case study areas to talk
[Attention]
– No Bullet points
– No hypothetical question and suggestion. Be critical
– No operation level discussion. Choose some topics in Project Manager level strategy discussion. Eg) How can exactly ‘Project Manager’ improve practical business issues via academic theory studies?
– Introduction and conclusion are required
– Choose specific topic eg) Case studies with references
– Use the theories to make a balance between arguments and counter arguments
– Balance different types of view, not only for one side supporting description
– Counter argument is essential eg) limitation of the argument
– What is the role of the Project Manager?
– It is very important to show that improvement of ethical decision making via academic learning to adopt practical business
[Key topic words]
Professionalism, Project management, Strategy, Success, Organization matrix, Leadership, Accountability, Responsibility, Ethics, Communication, Stake Holder, Clients, Motivation, Innovation, Framework, Monitoring, Control, Problem Solving, Execution, Effectiveness, Profitability, Value judge, Governance, Authority, Short and Long term plan, Academic knowledge, Practical adoption, Critical thinking, Complexity, Limitation, Hierarchy, Challenge, Situation,
[Sample simplified structure style]
Intro.
– how academic knowledge helps to improve practical professional project management.
– no hypothetical or judgement questions. eg) every academic research are helpful (x). this essay guesses academic doesn’t really help to improve practical level (x). In many research, there are many different opinions between academic and practical relationship (o)
– show what I will talk in this essay.
– few strong and clear argument sentence. It’s kind of summary from conclusion. Eg) according to many researches, academic helps to improve better understanding of project and set up an ethical decision making standard in various practical situation…
Body 1
– some definitions and explain eg) professionalism, project, project management, strategy, accountability vs responsibility…
– how to setup success in project. How do you define success in project
– how academic knowledge helps to practitioner (positive ways) (Academic references required)
– counter arguments. (balance between dis/advantages) eg) complexity, time critical, very hard to suitable case for real time work from academic, knowhow can be adopted in specific situations, it’s accumulated by experience only… (Academic references required)
Body 2
– case study adoption eg) for an example, nowadays, organizations structure of IT sector are shaking because it would have different result in different organization style such as team project work or bureaucracy
– show different organization matrix structure. Define different role of different pm position
– another example above. Business & development & quality manager managers have different Project Management Roles to products manager.
– In these cases, organization needs both cases in different situations, academic knowledge supports to improve acknowledge of practice (better understanding).
– It shouldn’t say that type 1 or 2 is always good or bad definitely, sometime 1 or 2 is good or bad depend on situation.
– more supporting critical evaluating with references
– develop all ideas and connect to ethical issues
Conclusion
– must reference academic paper from ‘Professionalism in Project Management: redefining roles’
– academic knowledge improve better understanding to establish ethical standard for pm. Ethical issues stand very differently in various situation however, PM must decide to lead project successful.
– therefore, academics definitely help to improve project management. Explain more detail.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]