What are the interests of the scientists as sciences here (i.e., what are their goals with respect to being able to conduct scientific research and/or communicate scientific findings and/or participate in a scientific community)?
What are the interests of the non-scientists?
How are the interests of each group reflected in the norms (i.e., the standards for ethical conduct) they identify as being important here?
How might conflicts in these competing sets of norms be reconciled (or otherwise dealt with)?
Here’s a rough strategy for using your allotted words effectively:
Setting up the issue (what is the questions, who is on which side, what big claim does each side make) � about 300 words.
The scientists’ interests � about 150 words.
The nonscientists’ interests � about 150 words.
What the scientists think ought to be done and why � about 100 words.
What the non-scientists think ought to be done and why � about 100 words.
A strategy for resolving the conflict � about 100 words.
The first of these (the set-up) is the section that will draw most heavily on your research. The other sections should focus on your analysis of the matter. Your task is to diagnose the conflicting interests at the heart of the matter, to explain how these lead the sides to identify different actions that would be best, and to illuminate any overlapping interests that might lead to a resolution of the conflict.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]