THE ROLE OF SOCIAL ENTERPRISE AND HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS

1. The title and author of the text you have chosen. You may include a full citation if you would like (this is good practice!), but it

will not be required for this assignment.
2. A brief, 1-2 sentence “summary” describing the main point or argument of the text.
3. A critical analysis of the text. This should make up the bulk of your journal.
Your analysis should address some (but not necessarily all) of the following questions:
a. Is the text well-written and effective, and why? What are its strengths and weaknesses? Some criteria to consider and discuss:
i. the author’s language (formality, word choice, repetition, patterns, etc)
ii. the author’s evidence and/or support for his/her opinion (quantity and quality)
iii. the author’s reasoning or logic
iv. the author’s bias and how it affects the text implicitly or explicitly
b. Context: What situation or event is the text responding to? Why did the author feel the need to write this text? What are the

historical, social, cultural, and intellectual factors that influenced the text?
c. Compare/contrast the text to other texts we have read in class or that you have read outside of class. How does this text relate to our

class and the themes/topics we have discussed?
4. A short personal response to the text (3-5 sentences). Some questions to consider (choose one or two per journal):
a. Did the text leave you with any questions; what are they?
b. How did the text make you feel? Did you like or dislike it and why?
c. Did this text convince you, make you change your mind, or inspire you, and why?
d. Are you personally or professionally interested in the content of the text, and how?
e. If this text is related to your major or research, how might it affect your work/studies?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Gone Girl and How it Relates to Forensic Psychology

The paper must compare and contrast how the character in ‘Gone Girl’ {Amy Dunne} played by Rosamund Pike. exhibits traits of being a

psychopath and how forensic psychology explains her behavior in the film. It would be nice to see an explanation about why psychopaths act

the why they do and behavior traits they exhibit. sources must be peer reviewed. besides the film

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Psychology Essay

The essay should be based on the Hergenhahn text (below) along with two relevant research articles. Please do not use other textbooks as extra references.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Thoughts related to “The Buffalo Creek Disaster”

You are reading “The Buffalo Creek Disaster” by Gerald M. Stern [ISBN: 0-394-72343-0] (double spaced) addressing each of
the following questions/issues:
(1) A minimum of ten (10) impressions, reactions, or take-away comments from
the book;
(2) Your reaction to the outcome of the case;
(3) Your personal assessment of the ethical conduct of Gerald M. Stern
(attorney), K.K. Hall (Judge), Pittson, the management of Buffalo Creek, and
any other character/participant in the story;
(4) How the case/story has impacted your view of the legal system (has it reaffirmed
what you thought or, perhaps, changed your view?);
(5) Knowing what you now do, what would you advise Attorney Stern (or
someone in his position), if a case like this were to occur again?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Explore the relationship between communication theory and research

Explore the relationship between communication theory and research. Your goal is to use a
research article to help you understand and suggest revisions to the theory of your choice.
Choose one of the theories listed below:
• Coordinated Management of Meaning of Pearce & Cronen
• Expectancy Violations Theory of Burgoon
• Uncertainty Reduction Theory of Berger
• Interactional View of Watzlawick
• Social Judgment Theory of Sherif
• Cognitive Dissonance Theory of Festinger
• Elaboration Likelihood Model of Petty and Cacioppo
• Uses and Gratifications of Katz
For the theory that you choose, you must locate and read a peer-reviewed, research-based
journal article that explicitly addresses the theory. The article should have been published within
the previous 5 years (since 2010). For examples of appropriate journals, see the list posted on
McGraw Hill’s website for the textbook.
In your paper, address the following questions:
Briefly describe the key components of the theory. Which of the primary concepts and
relationships of the theory does the article test? What are the study results? Based on the
results, how should the theory be revised? Be sure to include both your thoughts and those of
the article’s authors.
Your paper should be 2 pages of text (1 inch margins on all sides, Times New Roman, 12 point font,
double-spaced) in a Word document. Additionally, you should include a cover sheet and reference
page within the same document. Please use APA 6th edition format. Please submit your completed
assignment to the D2L dropbox. For this assignment, you should upload the journal article (saved as
a pdf document) as well as your paper. This assignment is worth 50 points.
Rubric Points Possible
Describe theory 5
Describe concepts/relationships tested 10
Article results – especially those pertaining to the theory 10
Revisions to theory
Suggested by authors 10
Suggested by student 5
APA formatting and writing 5
Article choice
Peer-reviewed journal 3
Research-based article 2
Total 50
*
Do not use an article from Communication Teacher, as this journal does not print research articles.
Do not use an article already assigned to be read for class. To help you confirm that your article is
research-based, look for a Methods and a Results section.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Five Books Of Moses: How are humans and the divine portrayed in the Pentateuch? What images and metaphors are used to describe who they are and what they do?

Biblical references from the five book of moses for you examples)(*no need for external research other than the five books of moses)(*limit your essay within 10 pages)
Questions1-5, write 23points, and eight points on the last question.Question One (23 pts) How are humans and the divine portrayed in the Pentateuch? What images and metaphors are used to describe who they are and what they do? Are humans and the divine similar to each other or more different? In writing your descriptions, consider especially the relationship between humans and God and the conflict between good and evil. How are the metaphors and images used as themes throughout the Torah? (Hint: You may wish to comment on how God is portrayed as imminent and transcendent; and to comment on human failure.) Question Two (23 pts) Consider the roles of women in the Torah. To what extent do the biblical authors portray women in various ways? How so? Which stories or texts about women (or a woman) caught you by surprise in the Five Books? Why? (Hint: In considering how women are portrayed, include why prostitution was not criminalized in ancient Israel.) Question Three (23 pts) Why (and how) is the Book of Leviticus so concerned with food restrictions and sexual relations? (Hint: be sure to include the issue of ownership and legal possession) Question Four (23 pts) The biblical text includes many diverse elements such as varying names for the divine, multiple voices and details, literary seams, and duplications. These characteristics gave rise to the Documentary Hypothesis (JEDP) in order to help explain and clarify the biblical writings. Yet, close readings of the Five Books will discern a general theme/plot (or plots) that begins in Genesis and continues through Deuteronomy. Drawing on specific biblical references (rather than theology), reflect on what you consider to hold this diversity of source material together. Are there any major themes that organize these Books? Or, conversely, should we see the Pentateuch primarily as an anthology of sacred stories that are only loosely connected? (Note: please do not use the theme of moving from powerless to self-determination mentioned above.) Question five(8 pts) This one is your choice! Tell us 8 points worth of anything about the five book of Moses (please be sure to tell us something that is not already on this questions above.)
Writing Rubric for Take-Home Essay Exams
1. Read all essay questions before you start
�underline key words (e.g., consider, describe, compare, explain, justify, define)
�make sure you understand what you are being asked. (See the Glossary of Essay Test Words for clarification)
�Begin with the question that seems easiest to you.

2. Simplify the Relationship implied by the question
�For example, if you were given the question, �Why does morality get tangled up in love and sex?�,
�you might narrow your response to a more specific cause-effect relationship such as, �When are decisions about love based in moral concerns? What definitions of �morality� determine ideas of love? Is morality more concerned with love or sex? If the ideas of morality change, do the ideas of love change (or vice versa)?�
�This focuses your attention on causes and relationship as a basis for discussion.

3. Jot down a rough outline
�Do this before actually writing
�List quickly, as they come to you, as many ideas and facts as you can
�Number your points in the order in which you want to present them, discriminating among main issues and supporting details and examples.
�As you are writing on one question, if you think of ideas and examples that you can apply to other questions, jot them down so you won’t forget them.

4. Identify two (or more) class readings or authors that address this issue.
While you write:
�Come up with a definite, clear sentence that directly answers the question. State this sentence within the first few sentences of your answer.
�Follow your outline: provide specific examples, substantiating facts, and relevant details. (point, proof, significance)
Final Hint:
�Use the technical vocabulary of the course (and of the question)Checklist For Essay Tests

Use the following as a guide when writing answers to discussion questions and as a checklist after you have written your answer.
Do I really understand what the question asks me to do?
Have I done the preliminary planning of my major points?
From reading the first sentence of my answer, does the reader know how I will develop my answer?
Do the major points stand out?
Are the major points supported with examples, supporting facts and/or ideas, and resources?
Are there clear transitions between the major points?
Would someone who has not taken the class be able to understand the concept discussed in the way I explained it?
Have I completely covered all major points needed to answer the question?
Did I stick to the question?
Did I proofread for misspelled words, sentence fragments, run-on sentences, comma splices, subject-verb or pronoun/antecedent agreement errors, logical progression, and other errors that might prevent the understanding of what I have written?

Essay Test Grading Rubric 1 (of 2)

Grade

Criteria

�A�

The answer shows a superior understanding of the topic.

The written response:
1) presents factors of central significance and explains them with substantial appropriate detail;
2) clearly shows how these factors (or issues) of the topic operate
3) has structure and grammar that serve the content

�B�

The answer demonstrates an accurate grasp of the topic.

The response:
1) presents important factors and explains them with adequate specifics;
2) shows partial detailed knowledge and partial synthesis;
3) has structure and grammar that usually serve content

�C�

The answer demonstrates an acceptable but commonplace understanding of the topic.

The response:
1) presents important factors but explains them with only the most obvious specifics;
2) delineates only the most obvious implications;
3) has structure and grammar that may cause minor distractions from the content

�D�

The answer demonstrates only limited understanding or a partial misunderstanding of the topic.

The response:
1) may use unimportant factors or may explain important factors or their significance with little coherence or specificity;
2) may make a number of serious factual errors;
3) has structure and grammar that sometimes impede the content and the reader’s understanding.

�D-/F�

The answer demonstrates little or no grasp of the topic.

The response:
1) may significantly misstate facts or misinterpret them;
2) may fail completely to justify the choice of factors;
3) may be a string of generalizations without specifics or specifics without generalizations;
4) has structure and grammar that may cause the reader significant difficulty.

Grading Standards Rubric for Essay Exams (2 of 2)

A+ – A-
(well above average to exceptional)
B � C
(above average to average)
D � F
(not suitable for university assignment)
Content (Communication)
Writing is creative and communicates answer clearly. Specifically addresses the question (does not include information outside the parameters of the question.)
Answer is generally well written, but lacking in detail, significance or content.
Writing poorly relates answer; non-creative work.
Organization
Excellent use of language, ordered and clear links to the topic. Sentence progression is logical.
Some connection to topic. Some lack of clarity and logical thought.
Lack of care, time and effort.
Development and Analysis
Impressive depth of insight and analysis. Well-developed process where author presents ideas and uses other�s ideas for support. Offers critical viewpoint.
Adequate depth. Recitation of other�s ideas is coherent. Key issues overlooked. Average or little critical thought.
Minimal or no depth or insight. Lack of understanding of material read.
Referencing
Strong evidence of knowledge of course material. Good use of references. None or very few formatting errors. No missing key sources.
Some evidence of knowledge of course material. Several errors in usage. Lacks integration.
Serious problems with class material. Errors in use of sources.
Conclusion
Ties together all elements = Effectively integrated. Includes critical thought and significance.
Adequate integration and some critical thought.
Lack of critical thought and weak integration
Overall cohesion
Clear, readable, coherent and mature. Avoids empty and pretentious language. Avoids ambiguities-abstractions and vague terms.
Readable; mostly coherent. Some use of empty language; at times ambiguous or vague.
Poorly constructed, unreadable, very ambiguous or pretentious.
Format & style Grammar/spelling
Grammatically and typographically superior. (No errors or, at most, 1 per page)
Grammatical and typographical errors
(2-3 errors per page)
Significant grammatical and typographical errors (4+ per page)
Structure and transitions
Clear sentences. Variety of paragraph and sentence format. Strong clear leads. Smooth transitions.
Sentences somewhat muddled with little variety in structure.
Poor grammar in sentence and paragraph structure. Awkward phrasing.
Overview & Presentation
Attractive and neatly presented.
Average presentation. Shows some interest.
Poorly presented. Lacks interest.

Glossary of Essay Test Words

ANALYZE: When asked to analyze, separate (a thing, idea, etc.) into its parts to find out their nature, proportion, function, interrelationship, etc.

CONSIDER or COMMENT: When asked to comment, you are asked to explore the impact and meaning of something; give a note in explanation, criticism, or illustration of something written or said; remark or make an observation made in criticism or as an expression of opinion

COMPARE: Examine qualities or characteristics in order to discover resemblances. The term compare is usually stated as compare with, and it implies that you are to emphasize similarities, although differences may be mentioned.

CONTRAST: Tell how two or more topics are different from associated things, qualities, or events, etc.

CRITICIZE, INTERPRET, and REVIEW: Express your judgment with respect to the correctness or merits of the factors under consideration. Give the results of your own analysis and discuss the limitations and good points or contributions of the plan or work in question.

DEFINE: Definitions call for concise, clear, authoritative meanings. Details are not required, but boundaries or limitations of the definition should be cited. Keep in mind the class to which a thing belongs and whatever differentiates the particular object from all others in the class.

DESCRIBE: In a detailed manner, relate the specific features and aspects of the topic. Identify key or primary points and sub-points where applicable. Include any implications of the points, and provide context as needed.
DIAGRAM, and ILLUSTRATE: Present a drawing chart, plan, or graphic representation in your answer. You may be expected to label the diagram or add a brief explanation or description.

DISCUSS: Examine, analyze carefully, and present detailed considerations pro and con regarding the problems or items involved. Often found in essays.

EVALUATE: Present a careful appraisal of the problem, stressing both advantages and limitations. Evaluation implies authoritative and, to a lesser degree, personal appraisal of both contributions and limitations.

EXPLAIN, RELATE: Clarify and interpret the material you present. State the “how” or “why,” reconcile differences in opinion or experimental results, and state causes if possible. In brief, tell how it all happened.

JUSTIFY, PROVE: To justify your answer, provide factual evidence or logical reasons. In such an answer, evidence should be presented in convincing form. Establish your answer with certainty by evaluating and citing experimental evidence or by logical reasoning.

LIST, ENUMERATE: Present an itemized series or tabulation. Be concise.

OUTLINE: Give main points and essential supplementary materials, omitting minor details, and present the information in a systematic arrangement or classification.

SUMMARIZE: Give the main points or facts in condensed form. Omit details, illustrations and examples.

TRACE: Give a description of progress, historical sequence, or development from the point of origin. Such narratives may call for probing or deductions.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Elliott Smith, Between the Bars

1) Choose two of the following six tracks: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFJYQbCgIxvGFk3bxobHsJKORYrB8yQ6&
feature=mh_lolz
Elliott Smith, Between the Bars [indie rock/folk]
Agalloch, You Were But A Ghost In My Arms [atmospheric black metal]
Refused, The Shape of Punk to Come [post-hardcore]
Godspeed You! Black Emperor, Moya [post-rock]
Tool, The Grudge [alternative metal]
Silverchair, Emotion Sickness [post-grunge]
2) write the analysis of the chosen track (on your own or in groups) using the analytic approach that we have used in the
course: style and genre, form and lyrics (you can GET lyrics from the Internet), time, phrasing, instrumentation and texture,
vocal and instrumental strategies.
3) 3-4 paragraphs

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Legislative Practicum Paper

The Legislative Practicum Paper and the Legislative Initiative Plan culminate in one written assignment submitted to faculty at the end of

the semester. This paper reflects not only your 9-hour practicum experience and the public/health policy initiative identified by the

elected official (Section One), but also the legislative initiative plan developed to help advance the elected official’s policy

initiative (Section Two) and nursing’s role/implications in this process (Section Three).
Each student will select an elected official and will volunteer for no less than 9 hours for that individual. (An Internet search of the

Supervisor of Elections for your county will give you the names and offices held of elected officials in your voting district. Remember

that school board members, judges, police officials, and city officials also serve in an elected capacity.) You may or may not actually

meet your elected official (especially if you select the President, Vice President, U.S. Congressman or Senator), but volunteering in

their local or district office will acquaint you with their key people and issues. You may be asked to show your Barry ID or for a letter

confirming your student status. I will be glad to provide any documentation or verbal confirmation necessary to facilitate securing your

practicum placement.

SECTION ONE: Practicum and Policy Background

During your volunteer time, you will identify a public policy initiative important to the elected official that addresses one of the

social determinants of health, a vulnerable/marginalized population, or health policy. This narrative- not to exceed 3 pages- will

comprise the first section (Practicum and Policy Background) of the final written assignment, and is worth 25% of your final grade in this

course. Please write the Practicum and Policy Background in paragraph form, not in a question: answer format, and address the following:
1. How and why did you choose the elected official?
2. What were your volunteer duties? What did you encounter/experience as a result?
3. Identify the policy issue that meets the above criteria and is important to your elected official. Why is this issue of interest to the

elected official?
4. What values held by your official are related to this issue?
5. Briefly describe the history/background of the problem related to this issue.
6. What population or group is most affected by this problem? How are they impacted?
What type of power do they have, if any?
7. Address the ethical, social, economic, cultural, and health implications of this problem.
8. What other things have been tried to resolve the problem?
9. How would the proposed policy improve or resolve the problem?
10. Describe any opposition to the proposed policy. What are the perceived/actual barriers to the proposed policy?
11. Where is the proposal currently in the legislative or process? What are the elected official’s goals for the proposal in this

legislative session?

Include 3 evidence-based citations in SECTION ONE to support claims/perceptions of the problem and/or the appropriateness of the proposed

policy in addressing the issue.

SECTION TWO: Legislative Initiative Plan

The second section (Legislative Initiative Plan) outlines the strategic action plan for moving the proposed policy forward in the current

legislative session. This section, along with Section Three (Nursing Role/Implications), comprise the Legislative Initiative Plan

component of this course and is worth 20% of your final grade. The criteria are based on the NLN Public Policy Toolkit. Please use a table

format (see example below) and limit your Legislative Action Plan to a maximum of 3 pages. Legislative Initiative Plans are necessarily

different for each policy, but certain key components are addressed in all Plans.

SECTION THREE: Nursing Role/Implications

The final section (Nursing Role/Implications) is a narrative- not to exceed 2 pages- addressing why this issue should be important to

nurses as healthcare providers and citizens, and explaining nursing’s role in helping to enact this policy. Include 2 current, evidence-

based, NURSING citations in SECTION THREE to support nursing’s role in influencing legislative initiative. Provide a summary for the

Legislative Practicum Paper.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Monitoring and evaluation

Monitoring and evaluating international development.

3. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of Theory of Change over the Log Frame based on literature.

? Excellent news: essay due date has been changed
? Due 11pm, 24 April (Canberra time)
? 3000 words (excluding Bibliography)
? Reference style: choose one that you are comfortable with (e.g. MLA, Harvard, Chicago Manual of Style, etc.)
? Your research skill
? Critical analysis of the topic/policy/project document
? Application of the analytical tools and theories learned from this course
? Ability to think and argue from an academic perspective

Introduction
? The introduction outlines the arguments and points that you develop in the essay
? It should contain a concise response to the essay question
? Essay question: Is the theory and practice of ecofeminism still relevant, or is it outdated?

Body.
? In this section, your objective is to fully develop the points and arguments made in the introduction. Ideally, use sub-headings to

structure your argument so there is a logical flow
? Suggested sub-headings to structure your essay (based on previous slide’s intro)
? Origin of ecofeminism
? Critiques of ecofeminism (e.g. victimisation and essentialist critiques which Agarwal, Leach, etc have made)
? Current direction of ecofeminism – the alliance with gender justice theory (this is where you might want to choose a few key theories or

theorists to support your argument)
? Ecofeminism and indigenous land rights activists (here you may want to consider using a case study)
? Ecofeminism, gender justice, and the reclaiming of indigenous cultural values and identities associated with land and natural resource

(remember your key theorists! Don’t forget about them!)
? The bolded sub-headings are the key points/arguments of the essay. The first two are backgrounds
Remember: this is one way of approaching the major essay, it’s a suggestion and not compulsory!

Conclusion
? Congratulations, you are almost there!
? Conclusion should restate the main arguments of your essay. It is NOT a repetitive summary of what you had said, but to highlight the

strengths of your argument and evidence to the reader.
? Sometimes you may find that during the writing process, you have changed the direction of your argument. During editing, you need to

compare between the introduction and the conclusion to make sure the points and arguments made in each are aligned.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]