Analysis on ethical dilemma in college athletics

(please include the headings ** in your paper) **Introduction** (1-2 paragraphs or 1 page): Describe the need for ethics in sport today Thesis statement: There is a need for ethics and sportsmanship in athletic competition. **Ethical Dilemma** Describe a situation that became an ethical dilemma, including events prior to, during and after the incident Must be a dilemma from college athletics; NOT professional sport Thesis statement must capsulizes who, what, when, where in the FIRST sentence. **Options and Choices for those Involved** Identify ALL individuals and groups involved in the dilemma and the options or choices available for each. The options and choices must be BEYOND the OBVIOUS (and must include at least 3 options for each individual and group). Please list all involved in the second sentence. Thesis statement: There are options or choices for each of the groups and individuals who were involved in this dilemma. Those involved include…. **Precedents for the Future** Describe the precedents that result from the incident or course of action taken. Thesis statement: The choices and actions taken by the coach (player, athletic director, etc.) will set precedents for the future. First paragraph: BASED ON THE OUTCOME of the dilemma, what will happen if this situation occurs again? Actions taken and choices made in this dilemma will set precedents for the future. Should a situation such as this one happen again, those involved will know that… Coaches will clearly understand… Players will know that… Second paragraph: What policies or procedures could be put into place so that this situation is not repeated? **Ethical Considerations** Identify and provide direct quote for the guideline or standard to be used to make an ethical decision. MUST include at least one (1) direct quote which is the standard/guideline for an ethical decision/action. Thesis statement: The ethical standards for this dilemma are… Total paragraphs: 3-5 **Role of the Coach and Others Involved** This section of the paper is a discussion of the role of the coach in the dilemma and an analysis of what should or should not have happened for this situation to be addressed ethically and appropriately. Explain the role of the coach in this situation. Present additional information or factors that are relevant or should be considered: Social = relationships Emotional = fear, anger, frustration, guilt, Academic = poor grades, degree, college scholarship Physical = potential injury, ongoing health issues Spiritual = doing what we know is right Discuss whether appropriate actions were taken. Analyze what happened; didn’t happen; should have happened.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Niche tourism ( culture and heritage)

An individual, written critique of a current trend within a niche tourism target market. (1500 word report) note: i chose culture and heritage This written work needs to focus on a single niche tourism service product and plot its popularity over time. It is suggested you find one that is increasing in popularity. Obviously this will require the use of some statistics and sourcing specialist journals and text. You might wish to consider tourism flows, seasonality, challenges/ barriers to future development and opportunities in terms of perhaps social change, tourism demands and technological advancements. A PESTLE and SWOT may act as useful platforms upon which the discussion and study can be structured. Higher grades will be awarded as follows: • evidence of wider research rather than just the content of the class discussion by seeking influences of other industries and factors; • higher level of critical analysis and debate, (contrasting the views of different authors) • accurate grammar, spelling and appropriate structure; • links to theoretical frameworks that are properly cited and referenced; • application of theory to practice and provision of examples/ best practice models; • use of contemporary sources to justify recommendations and conclusions

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Interprofessional Education/Creating an IP Course

Design the IP learning activity. • Identify the learners and the learning objectives. Learners should include health professional students represented by your team’s professions. What will the learners be able to do as a result of their learning? • What will be the activity’s content focus? Will it be interprofessional competency focused (improve teamwork skills for example) or include additional content (a clinical skill or topic area for example)? • Determine the methods of instruction. How will the learners acquire the information and practice any associated skills?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Community Clean up and Greening Act (HB31/SB57)

Community clean UP and Greening Act(HB31/SB57) Pros/Advantages Cons/Disadvantages The suject is related to Nursing/health The suject should reflect an innovative aspect of nursing practice, education,an policy

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Conflicting Viewpoints

Note: this assignment is broken down into 2 separate assignments. please complete assignment 1.1 in APA style and then complete assignment 1.2 is APA style. total pages written is 4. one for first assignment and 3 for the second. My preferred topic (pro) medical marijuana, https://www.procon.org/ – listed under Health and Medicine. ___________________ Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center. Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center. Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part I Prewriting Due Week 2 and worth 30 points When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking by playing the “Believing Game.” The Believing Game is about making the effort to “believe” – or at least consider – the reasons for an opposing view on an issue. The assignment is divided into two (2) parts. In Part I of the assignment (due Week 2), you will first read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes: “The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” at https://www.procon.org/sourcefiles/believinggame.pdf. Next, you will review the Procon.org Website in order to gather information. Then, you will engage in prewriting to examine your thoughts. Note: In Part II of the assignment (due Week 4), you will write an essay geared towards synthesizing your ideas. Part I -Â Prewriting: Follow the instructions below for this prewriting activity. Â Use complete sentences and adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling. 1. Select one (1) of the approved topics from the https://www.procon.org/ Website and state your position on the issue. 2. From the Procon.org Website, identify three (3) premises (reasons) listed under either the Pro or Con section – whichever section opposes your position. 3.For each of the three (3) premises (reasons) that oppose your position on the issue, answer these “believing” questions suggested by Elbow: a.What’s interesting or helpful about this view? b.What would I notice if I believed this view? c.In what sense or under what conditions might this idea be true?” The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing: •Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph. •Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences. •Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: •Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA Style format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. •Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: •Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language. •Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking. •Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic. Click here to view the grading rubric.. ——–part 2————– Students, please view the “Submit a Clickable Rubric Assignment” in the Student Center. Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center. Assignment 1.2: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part II Synthesizing and Writing Due Week 4 and worth 100 points When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking. The assignment is divided into two (2) parts. For Part I of the assignment (due Week 2), you read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes, reviewed the Procon.org Website in order to gather information, and engaged in prewriting to examine your thoughts. * Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the webtext. In Part II of the assignment (due Week 4), you will write a paper to synthesize your ideas. Part II – Writing Write at three to four (3-4) page paper in which you: 1. State your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1. 2. Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explain why you selected these specific reasons. 3. Explain your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website. 4. Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position. 5. Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases. 6. Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the same. The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing: Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph. Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences. Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA Style format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. You must follow these submission guidelines: Submit the essay to Turnitin.com and then submit the originality report and final essay with any needed revisions to Blackboard. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language. Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking. Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic. Click here to view the grading rubric..

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Project Management

“Provide a critical analysis of risk in projects. Identify and discuss several important factors that need to be considered by project managers, in respect of risk. You should provide a critique of these factors, utilising examples from practice to support your account. You should also state how the global environment informs professional practice, in terms of these factors.”

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Health Care Organization

Objectives – This objectives for this case will focus on A) an increased understanding of the steps needed for decision making in an organizational setting and B) conflict resolution Instructions: A midlevel administrator is in charge of a group of employees, two of his/her subordinates have job titles as supervisors even though they spend the majority of their time completing clinical or technical tasks instead of supervisory ones. As in many HCOs, everyone is the group is under pressure as workloads have been increasing steadily. The supervisor in charge of transcription spends 70% of her time transcribing. Over the last few weeks, she has stated several times that the work is backing up and asked for more help. However, her requests haven’t been overly strident, and seemed more like simple complaints, such as the administrator has been hearing from other workers, as versus an overwhelming problem. This morning the supervisor emails the administrator stating “Transcription workloads are weeks behind. Either I get more help by the end of next week or I am resigning.” Using the steps you’ve learned in the text 1) Identify 3 possible solutions to the problem? 2) Identify the trap her threat has created for the administrator? 3) What caused this problem? 4) Who is responsible for it? 5) What can be done to address the cause of this problem? 6) Could a case like this occur in the organization you want to work in? Find at least one peer reviewed article that would supports your conclusion. Your response to the questions in this case should be at least 1 page in length and utilize one peer reviewed journal article.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Continuous Quality Improvement

Minimum 7pages, including cover page, AND COMPLETE PDSA WORKSHEET (5pages for the body) APA format Include a complete PDSA worksheet or your Quality Improvement project Minimum of 5current references, (1) may be the text book(Advanced Performance Improvement in Health Care, author Donald E. Lighter)

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Shakespeare

Hi, As the second chapter is done very well I would now like to proceed to the wider reading for the chapter how women are submissive through their speech. Firstly, below is an example of how I would like it to be done and how it should be incorporated into the second chapter. Tonkin (2014) argues that this confusion reflects not only our own, but Redcrosse’s as he defeats Sansjoy, known as joylessness, but he fears this evil too much to care. The use of a simile, “double strokes, like dreaded thunders threat” (Spenser, 2007, C5S7, p.73), only quickens the pace further as it ends suddenly with “secret shade” (Spenser, 2007, C5S15, p.74) as Sansjoy disappears. The alliteration disappears as Redcrosse gains control of the situation. Originally, Duessa and Lucifera controlled this challenge to be fought on open plain the following morning so the audience could watch. The fact that the fight was planned shows how Redcrosse’s fantasy world advocate warfare for entertainment, and the act of controlling where and when this battle takes place shows Duessa and Lucifera in control. Tonkin (2014, p.66) states that “Redcrosse fights Sansjoy, but he does so not according to ground rules laid back down by his Christian god, but on Lucifera’s terms [and because of this] he must pay homage to the lady of the castle”. However, as Redcrosse became enraged within the battle he gained control and defied Duessa’s beg for mercy: “quench the flame of furious despight” (Spenser, 2007, C5S14, p.74) showing his possession of power whilst effectively breaking the knights code. He lost himself in the fight as he was consumed in pride and victory, with the need to assert himself over evil. Consequently, it is arguable that Malory and Spenser’s combative control can be seen as a reflection on the society that they lived in, especially Elizabethan society where it was a common form of entertainment to watch individuals in combat through joust tournaments. In having this challenge performed as a form of entertainment, Spenser glorifies combat. In reading other works by Spenser, such as The View of the Present State of Ireland, it is evidenced that Spenser is a positive advocate of combative violence as he argued that “butchery was necessary…due to the danger which they still posed, and also as an example to the Irish” (Canny, cited in Campbell, 2013, p.76). This belief shows how Spenser perceived violence as the only way to gain control. The wider reading in the paragraph above starts from “In reading other works by Spenser….” This is how I want you to do it- the wider reading doesn’t have to be at the end of a point, it could also be in the middle of a point. I would like only Shakespeare’s comedies as part of my wider reading and there should be a different play for each point on the wider reading- so the same play must not be mentioned twice in this chapter and it should relate to the argument and the title of the chapter as well as the point being made. As this order is only 825 words, I would like 2 wider reading/points on Bianca, preferably one on the point you have made in the second chapter about her turning from submissive to independent and one other one which again relates to the point. I would like 2 wider readings/point on Hero- one on the analysis if Hero calling men “my lord” and one other one. For A Midsummer Night’s Dream I would like 3 wider readings/points on Helena- one on the point about “Helena uses her speech to demonstrate her perception of the gender roles in a patriarchal society”, the second one on the point about “use me but as your spaniel….” And the final wider reading on the point about how Helena shows submissiveness through her speeches that idolise men. All the wider reading that will go into this second chapter must relate to the point that it is going into like the example above. It also needs to be expanded more than the point above in relation to how it links to the point and the title of the chapter. Finally, I was wondering instead of doing it on a separate document, is it possible if you could do it on the latest revised document for the second chapter, how women are submissive through speech, and just incorporate the wider reading into the points/paragraph into that document as it will be easier for me.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]