Category: Essays

1) Write a case study where a client has experienced a significant loss & decides to attend counselling to seek support around their issues of loss.
2) Ask someone you know to read the written case study & role play with you a 20 min scenario where you will act as the therapist & they will act as the client. Ask them to spend a few minutes preparing what they will say & how they would be feeling.
3) You will then write a 2000 word paper where you will first analyse their experience of loss according to any of the theories you have studied this term in this subject and then you will analyse & reflect upon your own conduct as a therapist in this context.
So in summary, you are required to interview a client & simulate a scenario where the client has experienced a significant loss. You will establish the interview according to ethical and professional practice, and show evidence of that in your written analysis.
It is recommended that you conduct an interview spanning approximately 20 minutes. You are to submit a summary / case study explaining & expressing the client’s situation.You do not need to submit a written transcript or a video of this interview. Your own written analysis of the client’s grief & situation according to the literature and your own analysis of your own conduct as a therapist forms the bulk of your assessment.
The client may play the role of any client you establish.You are permitted to use one of the case studies in your guide or develop your own case study and submit it to your lecturer at least 3 weeks before assessment is due.
In your written reflection you need to show evidence of your understanding of this client’s unique experience of vulnerability, grief & bereavement.
More important than demonstration of skill and technique is your demonstrated ability to reflect, analyse and critique and provide your rationale.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Research and choose an example of Community Development today. Use this example to identify, theoretically articulate & analyse as an Academic Case Study- Community Development principles and practices in action. Identify- the community of focus, the principles, power roles & alliances, networking, leadership/team skills, educational initiatives, “positioning”, development of communication / research / development skills:- as well as using public awareness groups and initiatives etc. Identify evidence of the underpinning social justice ethos in their work, and the range of values, skills, and insights drawn from social theory, and academic disciplines/ and models of practice. Demonstrate the efficacy of their sustainability principles and practices.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

This assignment is designed to promote the sharing of information across health practitioners. Engaging in this way can also develop partnerships that will assist not only with the completion of the systematic review but also with your future practice. It also helps us to get used to having our writing viewed by others, as is common in the workplace.

To complete this task you will need to do all parts of the assignment as outlined below:

(i) Clearly identify the research question topics to which you are providing peer critique.

(ii) Provide constructive feedback on areas of the assignment including:
• the explanation of why it is of clinical interest;
• the current practice or knowledge in the area;
• the clarity and conciseness of the research questions, including their compliance with a recognised format for the research question’s development (such as PICO/T) and the way the question has been refined;
• the rationale for the chosen search strategies, (designed to give the highest quality articles for the topic) including strategy with data bases; limiters including: language; date limiters; type of article; key words/MESH terms and their associated number of ‘hits’; logical refinement processes to select a minimum of 5 and maximum of 10 articles; and
• the peer-review journal choice and rationale for its use.

Marking criteria:
1. Clear identification of the research question you are reviewing (5 marks).

2. Constructive feedback is provided on your peer’s explanation of why it is of clinical interest. (15 marks)
3. Constructive feedback is given on your peer’s overview of the current practice or knowledge in this area. (15 marks)
4. Constructive feedback is given on your peer’s clarity and conciseness of the research questions, including their compliance with a recognised format for the research question’s development (such as PICO/T). Process for research question refinement is discussed to provide feedback to your peer. (20 marks)
5. Constructive feedback is given on your peer’s rationale for their chosen search strategies, (designed to give the highest quality articles for the topic) including data bases; limiters including: language; date limiters; type of article; key words/MESH and associated number of ‘hits’. Feedback on clarity of refinement processes to select a minimum of 5 and maximum of 10 articles. (30 marks).
6. Constructive feedback is provided on the journal and rationale for its use. (15 marks)

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

There is no one answer to any of these questions. The possibilities are numerous. The important thing is that you demonstrate knowledge of the field of leadership studies by drawing on a range of literature found in books and journal articles on leadership. Normal academic referencing is required for this essay. How you decide to approach the essay is up to you and will require some creative thinking as well as attention to how you will structure your argument. The criteria for evaluating this assignment are:
Identification of key issues
Structure of essay
Use of appropriate examples
Demonstrated understanding of the literature
Demonstration of analytical capacities
Demonstrated independent research
Presentation and referencing

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

• The cover page of your essay should display the following information:
Subject:
Question Number or Title:
Your student number: (Your name should not appear anywhere on the document)
Total word count:
(Please ensure that when you check your word count you do so campus.
Your essay will be checked and penalised if over the word limit)
• If your work exceeds the maximum word limit by 1-300 words, an automatic penalty of 5 marks will be deducted from your essay. If you exceed the word limit by 301 words or more a further 5 marks will be deducted from your essay.
• You must reference any cases cited using OSCOLA referencing system, which is The Oxford Standard for Citation of Legal Authorities (OSCOLA) you can use OSCOLA reference guide
• Word Count: 5000 words INCLUDING footnotes, but EXCLUDING bibliography.
• Please check your work carefully to ensure that your footnotes are included in your word count.
• Please also ensure that your electronic version is a word document.
• THIS ASSIGNMENT IS ASSESSED and forms 100% of the whole of your assessment.
Please answer ONE of the following questions:-
1. Does the post-2013 U.K regulatory model serve better to the FiSMA 2000 regulatory objectives? Discuss this in light of the PRA and the FCA.
2. Can a deposit insurance scheme prevent a bank-run? Discuss this in the context of bank regulation in the UK
3. The European Capital Requirement Regulation and Capital Requirement Directive (CRR/CRD) do not give the member state any discretion over the capital requirement implementation in the context of regulating its financial institution.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

I am going to open my business which is a adventure travel agency providing provides which sells travel and tourism products and services to leisure and corporate travelers.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

You will write a poem or song inspired by the themes, characters, and spirit of the assigned literature (Gillian Flynn � Sharp Objects.) Your poem or song must be at least 250 words.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

What legal and ethical justifications for the doctrine of vicarious liability can you identify? How many are appropriate in the modern world?
The doctrine of vicarious liability lies at the heart of all civil and law systems of tort law. It represents not a tort, but a rule of responsibility which renders the defendant liable for the torts committed by another. The classic case is that of employer and employee: the employer is rendered strictly liable for the torts of his employees, provided that they are committed in the course of the tortfeasor’s employment. In such cases, liability is imposed on the employer, not because of his own wrongful act, but due to his relationship with the tortfeasor. The claimant is thus presented with two potential defendants: the individual tortfeasor and a third party, likely to be with means and/or insured and usually clearly identifiable in circumstances where it may be difficult to identify the actual culprit in question.
Any study of vicarious liability cannot therefore avoid consideration of its role in determining who ultimately bears the burden of paying compensation. For example, in the UAE, vicarious civil liability is set out in Article 313.1.b of the Civil Code as follows:
“(1) No person shall be liable for the act of another person, but nevertheless the judge may, upon the application of an injured party and in the event that in his opinion there is justification for taking that course, render any of the following persons liable as the case may be to satisfy any amount awarded against a person who has caused the harm:…(b) any person who has actual control, by way of supervision and direction, over a person who has caused the damage, notwithstanding that he may not have had a free choice, if the act causing harm was committed by a person subordinate to him in or by reason of the execution of his duty.
(2) Any person obliged to make good may have recourse against the person against whom the original award was made.
How will the essay be assessed?
Introduction:
• This should provide an abstract/ summary of all the issues you wish to discuss in the body of the essay.
• This is your roadmap to the essay. It tells the examiner where you are going and how you plan to get there.
Mark
2/
Body of essay:
• Discuss one after the other the issues you have already identified in the introduction.
• You should divide the body of the essay into sub-sections as you deem appropriate.
Mark
2/

CONCLUSION:
• This should be a summary of the issues you have discussed in the body of the essay.
• An essay without a conclusion is like an unfinished painting.
Mark
2/
Support you discussion with:
• Academic authorities – i.e. textbooks, articles, etc (Suggested 4 references).
Mark
2/
Academic discipline:
• Writing a good essay involves knowing what to include and what to leave.
• All sources quote/cite must be acknowledged and appropriately referenced.
Mark
2/
Analysis and evaluation:
• How you have analysed and evaluated the subject-matter of the essay.
• How much you know and understand the subject-matter.
• How you have applied legal, academic and judicial sources.
• How you structured and presented the essay.
• A judgment as to the overall value of the final outcome, and its relative welfare gains when compared to alternative outcomes that might have been reached.
Mark
10/

Each essay should be 1.5 lines, 12 font, 1 inch margins. Please have a cover page with your name, course name/professor’s name, and date. The body of the paper should be approximately 3-4 pages (1200 word) (Excluding cover and bibliography). Plagiarism/copying other people’s work will be detected and punished with a zero, and possibly expulsion.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Marketing Plan
We are a coca-cola company. In the files u can look at our marketing plan for coca-cola.U need to write customer analysis and product ,this two parts.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Are you your “own person,” or are you influenced by what you see andhear daily in any media source? Do you believe the media is mostly negative, positive, or neutral in its delivery of world events? Explain your rationale.

The instructor expects the following:
eminder to help you keep on track. I do not accept blogs, newspapers, wiki, internet sources, books, encyclopedias, magazines of any kind, etc. in Discussions, Short Papers, Final Papers, etc. You may use the SNHU reading material in the Module Resources as a guide to help you to formulate your thoughts, but please do not use those articles as your source of information for your work. They are not peer-reviewed. If you build your discussion on this foundation it will be considered as “not credible”.
Remember that as a general rule, you are only as credible as your sources. Magazines such as USA Today, The NY Times, The Boston Herald, The Economist, Time, etc. are not peer reviewed journals and do not contain peer-reviewedl articles. The authors of these “articles” are politically-not scientifically-driven or grounded. In this course, we look towards a more scientific explanation in order to help us understand the social world around us. Please do not lose sight of this. Incorportating these types of articles into your discussions/papers/projects will only cause you to lose points in many areas.
Peer-reviewed journals usually start with “Journal of ________”. For example, in her discussion, Steffani has correctly referenced the following; one is APA which is acceptable and the other is a peer-revewed journal:
American Psychological Association. 2013. Gun Violence: Prediction, Prevention and Policy.Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/pubs/info/ reports/gun-violence-prevention.aspx
Roberto, A., Meyer, G., Johnson, A., Atkin, C., & Smith, P. 2002. Promoting Gun Trigger-Lock Use. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30(3), 210.
On the graduate level, you are expected to understand how to research a peer-reviewed journal article in order to support your own work. You must use scholarly resources effectively that reflect the depth and breadth of the topic you are investigating. Scholarly being the key word. It is up to you to decide the type of work you present, but please remember that you are, and will be, graded on a set of pre-defined graduate level criteria.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]