Should tests of English language generally conform to native speaker standards and norms of correctness? Critically evaluate this view, commenting on whether new varieties or non-native speaker variation can or should be taken into account when constructing a test of English.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Provide an overview of the different types of bilingual education, and explain why and in what way the so called ‘strong’ forms of bilingual education are more effective than ‘weak’ forms, referring to the literature. Comment on the limitations of research carried out to prove the effectiveness of bilingual programmes.You can refer to Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism.
Word limit: 3,000 to 3,500
Marking criteria, Level 7
• Demonstration of a range of relevant reading and understanding of issues
• Demonstration of critical evaluation of issues related to the various facets of bilingualism in different contexts (societal, individual, educational, cognitive)
• Depth and breadth of discussion of the chosen topic
• Coherence of assignment, especially overall organisation and division into sections and paragraphs
• Presentation, especially correctness of referencing and bibliography
• Quality of writing
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]This paper will ask you to:
• Understand the various stylistic and craft elements, as well as genres, of blog culture
• Employ some of these conventions in writing your own argumentative blog post
o Making a claim is key (e.g. it can’t simply be a set of observations/descriptions, or a roundup of what other people have published on the web, even though these are common genres of blog posts).
o Keep in mind the fundamental principles of sound critical reasoning and writing we’ve discussed since January—they’ll still apply.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]• Do not put your name, PID, or any other identifying information on your paper. (Your paper will be identified on D2L).
• Your paper needs to have a strong, clear, and comprehensive thesis followed by an organized presentation of the evidence in favor of your argument from the text(s). In other words, the purpose of your paper is to prove your analytical argument.
• Papers need to be between 4 and 5 pages, double-spaced, in size 12 Times New Roman font. The margins of your paper should all be 1”. Any deviation from these norms will result in a lower grade and will prevent you from developing your argument properly.
• Make certain that your paper is written in a proper academic register. Phrases like “I think,” “I believe,” and “so-and-so resonates with me” need to be avoided. Be assertive and confident in your writing. Also, you must avoid the use of contractions and colloquialisms such as “isn’t” and “don’t” (contractions), and “just my two cents,” “dude,” “cool,” (colloquialisms) etc.
• Be sure that you focus on addressing the issue in the topic you choose. Your goal is not simply to list the questions for consideration provided and answer them in order. Rather, you need to form a cohesive and organized argumentative paper using the questions as a guide.
• It is EXTREMELY IMPORTANT that your paper contain a thesis statement. I will briefly explain thesis statements in recitation, but if you are still unsure, see me during my office hours. If you do not have a thesis statement, you cannot pass this assignment.
• If you are choosing a compare/contrast paper topic, then do not simply list similarities and differences. You need to go beyond this superficial layer into the realm of analytical thought. Ask yourself: what do these similarities and difference signify and why are they important?
• Your paper must be mostly analytical in nature. In other words, do not simply summarize the story of the text(s) that you are focusing on. You must go beyond simply retelling the story. You need to make an argument that goes beyond the text to deal with complicated issues and answer questions raised by the text(s). An “A” paper is one that deals with these difficult questions, probes deeply, maintains their complexity, and handles the issues well in an organized and sustained manner. A superficial interpretation of the text will not earn the highest points possible for the analysis.
• If you are going to use sources outside of the course pack, then you must cite the ideas or information that you took from said sources in a bibliography at the end of your paper (the bibliography does not count towards the page requirements). If you are only going to cite the course pack, then you do not need a bibliography, but you should still use in text citations in the following format: (CP course pack page/original page).
• Wikipedia is not a suitable source of information for your paper.
• Make sure that you properly proofread your paper. Grammar and spelling are a part of your grade; do not ignore this facet of the rubric.
Finally, make sure to see me or send me an e-mail if you are stuck, confused, lost, or have any questions about preparing for or completing this assignment.
Topic 1: Lu Xun and May Fourth Literature
For this topic, write about the May Fourth Movement from a literary perspective. In other words, consider the major characteristics associated with the writing from this movement and analyze the works of Lu Xun to show how they are represented in his writings. This should not be a mere description of the story or essay that you write about. Rather, your interpretation will result from explaining how Lu Xun communicates his message by discussing specific examples from the text.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Clear reasons why Human Bocavirus is not a clinically significant human pathogen
well explanation and bachground
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Ethical scenario
You are a specialised social worker at a large tertiary public hospital and you work with women who experience unplanned pregnancies and are considering their options: continuing the pregnancy, terminating the pregnancy or adoption. You provide intake, assessment, counselling, advocacy and support services to women.
You are called by the hospital staff to see a woman, Debbie, lives in regional Victoria, and who is fifteen weeks pregnant and who has been admitted to a hospital ward overnight after she was admitted to hospital after excessive drug and alcohol consumption that has caused her to become very unwell. The hospital staff tells you they have concerns for the health and viability of the foetus due to the drug and alcohol use during pregnancy. They tell you that they have previously worked with Debbie (these notes are in her hospital file) who has a long history of poly-drug and alcohol use, and a complex history of her own childhood abuse as well as having been the victim of domestic violence from multiple partners as an adult. Debbie has four children, none of whom are in her care, and has mentioned the idea of having an abortion but is also stating she will not do this as it is against her belief systems to have an abortion and that ‘every child should have a right to be born’, and also because she believes that Child Protection services are pressuring her to have an abortion. The hospital staff are concerned that if Debbie continues the pregnancy the child will suffer severe medical issues including brain damage from foetal alcohol syndrome and have discussed this with the relevant specialists. The staff ask you for your assessment of ‘what Debbie wants’ as well as discussing the need for urgent ante-natal care for Debbie, and of the need for available abortion services for Debbie as a back-up. They also tell you that Debbie has a history of absconding from the hospital, and failing to turn up to booked appointments.
When you sit with Debbie and being discussing the issues with her as she sees them, she tells you of her history of violence from multiple partners, including the father of this pregnancy. Debbie tells you she has just come out of refuge due to the violence experienced from this partner, however that she would like to ‘have this baby’ and give it to her partner because ‘he’s had a hard life’ and ‘might be a good father’. Debbie discusses in detail her experience of having a previous abortion into which she was forced by a partner, and how this was traumatic for her and that she couldn’t do it again. She tells you that she has had a long relationship with Child Protection and that she ‘hates them’ as they have always punished her for the family violence she has experienced from partners. She tells you she is very angry at the pressure from Child Protection for her to have an abortion and that she ‘might as well have another child’ in this context. Debbie then mentions that she might actually need to have the abortion ‘sooner than later’ as is not sure if her partner, who has a new girlfriend now, will ‘take the baby’ and ‘if he doesn’t, then (I) will probably abort’.
Debbie asks you to hold her abortion appointment for another week so she can consider what to do.
You are aware that the only available public (free) abortion services that exist in the state must see Debbie before another week passes or she would be too late to access an abortion there. You are aware that there are many other women who are also hoping to access the same limited appointments that Debbie wants. They also experience similarly difficult situations to Debbie, including being victim/survivors of violence, homelessness, and mental health issues and that they won’t be all able to get a service.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]For this paper the writer have to watch the youtube videos provided in an attached file. and then write a response to those videos using the reading materials attached and the lecture notes.
I really prefer writer 5550 to work on this paper for me. since this writer wrote my previous paper which had a similar theme and it was great.
My previous paper written by writer 5550 is also attached and notes on how to improve it is also available on it. please use those notes in order to improve this new paper.
Everything needed to write this paper is attached to the order. Please read them carefully before writing the paper – don’t get to wordy and you don’t need to use ALL the professional language talked about in A Short Guide… . Summary: – Thesis – The more videos the better ( they all have to be connected to the thesis – 2 Readings — Use film terms — differentiate between readings, film,.. (in citation) — for lecture citing: (Keeling, Name of the Lecture) — for lecture citing in the appendix: (Keeling, Name of Lecture, AMST 274, USC, Spring —>>> CLOSE ANALYSIS OF SCENES: 1) Introduce the Scene 2) Explain the scene 3) Analysis of the scene —>>> Each film/Reading should match an announced theme and the themes should be connected to each other.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Do Companies Need a HR Department?
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]This literature review aims to describe the learning methods (single loop and double loop learning).
The description for the single loop learning should be 0.5 to 0.75 page and the 2.5-2.25 should be about double-loop learning and the related theories which include theories of action, governing values, action strategies (theory in-use and espoused theories), defensive routines .. etc.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]This assignment is on innovation course, its on reflecting on the 6 sandpits I’m going to list below. I need you to create a summary of the critical aspects and how they link to the concepts of the workshops that I’m going to attach. and then synthesise the view from what have been learnt. I’m going to list all the sandpits and the work shop related to it and then link each one with the concepts in the workshop related please.
SANDPITS:
1-legogame (creation) this is on workshop number 4 that is attached,please link the idea of sandpit to the concept and what have been learnt.
2. To build a family tree(revolution tree of product) that shows how products are started from the scratched like the real history of the product its on worshop number 6, please link the idea of sandpit to the concept and what have been learnt.
3. been given empty toilet rolls and hangers to create something it on workshop number 7,please link the idea of sandpit to the concept and what have been learnt.
4.been given empty boxes and containers to create something useful its on workshop 10,please link the idea of sandpit to the concept and what have been learnt.
5. went to a cafe (pattern recognition) and try to think how improve the cafe the products nd services offered by being innovative and sourcing opportunities and process of innovation. its on workshop number 12, please link the idea of sandpit to the concept and what have been learnt.
6.all students are asked to bring anything and put the stuff all together to create something useful then students started yo create interesting things. its on workshop number 15, please link the idea of sandpit to the concept and what have been learnt.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]