Book Review: Hawke, David Freeman. Nuts and Bolts of the Past: A History of American Technology

Hawke, David Freeman. Nuts and Bolts of the Past: A History of American Technology, 1776-1860. New York: Harper & Row, 1988.

A book review should critically describe, analyze, and evaluate a book on a number of categories including (but not limited to) depth of research, quality of ideas and thinking, support for its thesis, writing ability, and originality. The first paragraph of your review should contain a description of the author’s thesis. That is, explain what the author hoped to accomplish in writing this book. What point is she or he trying to make? Frequently authors make this explicit in the introduction of the book, but sometimes you will have to dig a little deeper to determine what the author hoped to prove. If you cannot determine the author’s thesis, you should probably choose a different book.

Next, you should briefly summarize the book. This summary should not exceed one page in length and should focus on the key issues and events of the book. Do not write a chapter-by-chapter summary of the book! The rest of your review, or at least the majority of it, should be a critical examination of key topics and ideas presented by the author, followed by an analysis of the book as a whole. Key questions to consider are the author’s qualifications, depth of research, use of evidence, indications of bias, and logical presentation. How well does the author present his case? Does she prove her point? Do you agree with the author’s reasoning? If possible, you should compare this book to others that you have read on the same subject. If it contradicts the textbook(s), you should mention that. Your last paragraph (conclusion) should sum up your arguments and make a final recommendation for or against your book. It never hurts to consult other sources or consult published reviews of the book you are reviewing to see what other writers thought of the book. However, do not copy them because that is simply straight out, plain-and-simple plagiarism!

Quite possibly the best source for professionally written book reviews on your particular work is found in JSTOR. If you have this database through your college or university that is good, but if you do not then there is another source you can pursue. Since this is a RODP course you have access to JSTOR through the University of Memphis’ McWherter Library, and if you need help accessing their database please contact your instructor for help. You may want to find journal articles written by your particular author or that discuss the author’s work. Also worth looking at is Contemporary Authors, which will give you some biographical information on the author. You may also be able to find information about the author on the Internet. You must provide a full bibliographic citation for the book you read and for any other sources that you used. The citation for the book you are reviewing should appear as the Title of you review at the top of your paper. You will find an explanation of how to prepare the Title of your Book Review at the bottom of these instructions..

Quick suggestions:
1.) Your paper should be neat, grammatically correct, and well written. It should adhere to the above structural guidelines and contain solid introductory and concluding paragraphs that are in agreement with one another. Papers lacking these will be penalized.
2.) Avoid using too many quotations, and quote only when absolutely necessary. Be sure to mention who you are quoting. Footnotes, endnotes, or MLA style parenthetical citations (author, page #) are all fine. Choose one style, and stick with it. Avoid contractions.

3.) Organize your paper into discrete paragraphs. Remember . . . A change in topic requires that you begin a new paragraph.
4.) Avoid overwriting (i.e., using several sentences when a single sentence will make your point).
5.) Avoid the passive voice and phrases such as “seems to,” “may be,” “appears to,” and similar phrases that weaken your writing. Also, the use of contractions in college-level writing is not permitted (i.e., isn’t, doesn’t, wouldn’t, won’t, ain’t, he’s, her’s, etc.).

8.) Write about the past in the past tense.
9.) In formatting your review:
a.) Do not play games with fonts and margins. The standard font throughout your entire review should be a Times New Roman, New Century Schoolbook, Calibri, Helvetica, Arial, etc., set to the standard 12 point size.
b.) Your document’s margins should be set to 1” all round; top, bottom, left, and right. Do not use headers or footers!
c.) Lastly, for the TITLE and BODY of your Book Review, you should set the line spacing to double-line spacing.
10.) If you are using a word processor that has a spell or grammar checker, then use it. However, be aware that their suggestions are not always correct and you need to check over your work constantly.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Legal Aspects of Oil & Gas

Learning outcomes to be examined in this assessment (please note that this is not the assessment task)
Demonstrate a good understanding of the substantive rules of international law applicable to the oil and gas industry

Evaluate the key principles of contract formation in international commercial transactions and key international law principles and trends in the oil and gas sector

Assess the effectiveness of international law in addressing the environmental impact of oil exploration and exploitation

Demonstrate a critical understanding of the importance of oil and gas law as a distinct subject, studied in a practical and commercial context.

Knowledge and understanding: Demonstration of detailed knowledge of the legal framework of oil and gas industry and the implications of national, regional and international law.

Cognitive/intellectual skills: Ability to analyse a range of information and to synthesise ideas, selecting appropriate techniques of evaluation.

Key/Transferable skills: Ability to manage information towards a given purpose and understand the relevance in the analysis of legal problems.

Practical skills: Ability to apply given techniques to the solution of particular problems.

Percentage of marks awarded for module:
This assignment is worth 50% of the total marks for the module

Assessment Task:
An Individual Essay/Report

When it comes to allocating and managing risks in the Oil & Gas Industry, there are several ways in which both the host country and the international oil companies manage this. Discuss the different ways in which this is managed by the parties in a Product Sharing Agreement and comment on whether the status quo is satisfactory.

You must support your answer with relevant and appropriate examples.

Assessment criteria
Explanatory comments on the assessment criteria
Maximum marks for each section

Content, style, relevance and originality
· Relevant, accurate content, demonstrating research, as required by the assessment task.
· Clearly evaluates social media usage by businesses
· Specific to e-commerce companies.
· Great emphasis will be placed on originality – work that is clearly student’s own.
40%

Constructive critical analysis
· Demonstrates the ability to critically analyse and/or evaluate the use of social media by e-commerce companies.
· Demonstrates that you have consulted widely – using appropriate sources and examples to substantiate your arguments.
· Application of relevant academic models should be evident but not necessarily explicit.
· Provides alternative views on the usefulness of social media in online businesses.
30%

Overall structure
· Coherent structure, presented in a report format, utilising headings as appropriate; should include a title page and clear table of content.
10%

Introduction and conclusion
· Clear triangulation of introduction, discussions and conclusion.
· Introduces issue(s) for further exploration.
10%

Referencing style
· Full in-text referencing using the Harvard citation style.
· Structured reference list or bibliography using the Harvard referencing method.
10%

Assignment outline
The task is an individual essay and must be presented in an essay format as per the stated word count above. It is important that your essay or report is properly structured. Also, as this is an academic paper, you should draw on contemporary literature to support your paper. Remember that this individual essay accounts for 50% of your module assessment. Hence, bad performance will have a big impact on this module.

Your essay should include references to the appropriate literature (textbooks, journals and websites). Care should be taken when consulting websites as they are not all equally authoritative (for example Wikipedia is not peer-reviewed; therefore is not considered an academic reference website). A minimum of 5 different academic references must be cited, but a well-researched essay/report is likely to cite many more.

Marking Criteria for Task 1

Indicative Grade
UK% marks
Characteristics.
Distinction
70%+
Very high standard of critical analysis using appropriate conceptual frameworks.
Excellent understanding and exposition of relevant issues.
Clearly structured and logically developed arguments.
Good awareness of nuances and complexities.
Substantial evidence of well-executed independent research.
Excellent evaluation and synthesis of source material.
Relevant data and examples, all properly referenced.
Merit
69-60%
High standard of critical analysis using appropriate conceptual frameworks.
Clear awareness and exposition of relevant issues.
Clearly structured and logically developed argument.
Awareness of nuances and complexities.
Evidence of independent research.
Good evaluation and synthesis of source material.
Relevant data and examples, all properly referenced.
Pass
59-50%
Uses appropriate conceptual frameworks.
Attempts analysis but includes some errors and /or omissions.
Shows awareness of issues but no more than to be expected room attendance at classes.
Arguments reasonably clear but underdeveloped.
Insufficient evidence of independent research.
Insufficient evaluation of source material.
Some good use of relevant data and examples but incompletely referenced.
Pass
49-40%
Adequate understanding of appropriate conceptual frameworks.
Answer too descriptive and or any attempt at analysis is superficial containing errors and omission.
Shows limited awareness of issues but also some confusion.
Arguments not particularly clear.
Limited evidence of independent research and reliance on a superficial repeat of class notes.
Relatively superficial use of relevant data sources and examples and poorly referenced.

PASS MARK=40%

E
39-30%
Weak understanding of appropriate conceptual frameworks. Weak analysis and several errors and omissions.
Establishes a few relevant points but superficial and confused exposition of issues.
No evidence of independent research and poor understanding of class notes or no use of relevant data, sources and examples and no references.

It is recommended that you review the requirements of the assignment before submitting your work.

Students should conform to the conventions of the above assessment format in the preparation of their assignments. The relevant assessment criteria have been stated to enable and guide students in the preparation of their work. Achievement of the learning outcomes and the application of relevant theories to the assessment task should be demonstrated.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Ethics for the information age

There are three parts, Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3. You have to write a short essay for each part and the final paper needs to be at least 1-2 pages, single spaced. Sources must be cited in APA format. I will also attach a couple documents to help with the assignment. The “Assignment” document will list the instructions for the assignment in detail. The “Format Requirements” document explains all of the requirements for the document. Please DO NOT add page numbers or running headers to the document, they are NOT necessary. Also, if you are interested in my course textbook, it is Quinn, M. J. (2011). Ethics for the information age (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Addison Wesley.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Is ‘state capitalism’ a contradiction or a paradox? Why?

Please use credible academic sources of references. Please include a complete bibliography and footnote e.g. page number etc.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Discuss three symbolic images and/or events in Native Son and how they add meaning to the novel

This is an open-book exam. It is due on Tuesday the 24th to be handed in (or emailed) by class time (6pm).
Please choose 4 of the following 6 �mini essay� questions. Your answers should be carefully explained, between 300 and 400 words, and include examples from the text to support your points. You do not need to structure your answers in essay form: a single long paragraph or two is fine.

1. Discuss three symbolic images and/or events in Native Son and how they add meaning to the novel.
2.Compare and contrast the mirror scenes in Black Like Me in terms of how Griffin sees himself and feels about himself in each instance.
3. Compare and contrast Griffin�s and Bigger�s experiences with white men as portrayed in their texts.
4. Discuss three techniques Richard Wright uses to create his distinct literary style.
5. Discuss blindness as a theme in both Native Son and Black Like Me.
6. Define systemic injustice in detail and provide an example from Native Son and Black Like Me to demonstrate its meaning.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Addressing Poverty through a Global NGO

1, Only 1000 words are required. 2, I will upload you three instructions, stick on them please! (1) File ‘Business_case_examples’ is a example which shows the format, content and structure of the paper, do not answer questions separately but write it as an integrated paper. (2) PDF ‘Case 3 NGO Jakarta’ is the case you need to analyse. (3) File ‘ULMS152 Case Study 3 Student Notes’ is the questions. 3, I have no time to revise the essay, write it according to the instructions strictly please! 4, No reference is needed. 5, Write an essay but not just answer questions

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Summarizing caracteristics of learners

Student with Behavior Disorders.
One or more areas of eligibility, level of intellect, academic achievement (readiness), and executive functioning. A case study based on correct information is presented and includes learning style and interest.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Identity the issue you are dealing with

I. Introduction
– identity the issue you are dealing with
-what makes issue so significant
(Cite facts, statistics, ETC. In order to emphasize importance.)
II. Historical overview
III. Current state on the issue
-key opposing arguments
-critical facts
-Statistics
-Current laws
-Significant cases/examples
IV. Possible solutions
-What have people tried to do
-what do experts believe
-what are the activists groups
-future legislation
V. Conclusion
-present your own views

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]