Management of Health Systems

Thinking about the organisations that deliver healthcare in your locality, construct or identify organisational charts for

at least 2 of them. These do not need to be detailed. Based on your knowledge of public health and health systems,

speculate as to the underlying causes of any similarities or differences between the two organisations.
Note the following strictly:
• Use Harvard format for all In-text citations and references.
• All sources must be scholarly and fully referenced, indicate the URL of sources where available.
• Please check for plagiarism.
• Use real life examples where applicable.
• The instructions for this assignment must be strictly adhered to.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

analysis of two episodes or passages from the documents about the 1741 New York slave/conspiracy trials using the concepts of space and place

Your goal in this assignment is to write an analysis of two episodes or passages from the documents about the 1741 New York slave/conspiracy trials using the concepts of space and place. To do this, begin by reviewing this document. Find two episodes or passages that you think you can analyze using the concepts of space and place. You should have one episode or

passage for each concept. Then: Analyze each of the passages making use of the appropriate concept. You should both do a

close reading of the passage and relate the passage to some of the larger course themes, drawing on you (now extensive)

knowledge of colonial society, culture and politics. Be sure to explicitly use the idea of place or space as a tool of

analysis. For each passage or episode, make a brief argument for how you think applying the concept as you have defined it

to this passage helped you better understand the source. Questions you might consider (though you do not need to answer all

or indeed any of them): Does applying the concept to this source reveal something that is not otherwise obvious? Does it

help us integrate the source into other discussions we have had in the course? In other terms: what is the value added of

using this concept to think about this passage? –no need citation, just need to paraphrase the sentences and label the

page number at the end of the sentences. (not too much quotations, better paraphrase them.) Well Explaining the concept of

place and space historically in the first 2 paragraph.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

HOW TO BE AN EFFECTIVE LEADER AND ITS MANAGEMENT

This assignment is more like a thesis where we need to develop individual project.
I have chosen the topic “HOW TO BE AN EFFECTIVE LEADER AND ITS MANAGEMENT”.
So please write a project about this topic and please follow all the instructions and marking scheme as written in the

instructions file I uploaded.

The project has two parts: progress report and final report.
The progress report is more like an abstract of the final report.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Analysis of Anheuser Busch InBev Merger

The full report (approx 15 pages) consists of three parts, please cover the first half, that is from part 1a. to part 2d

and focus on the AB InBev merger.

Part 1. Before the acquisition
a. What is the corporate strategy of the acquirer?
b. What is the corporate strategy of the target?

The answers to these questions will cover:
– What businesses are they active in?
– What’s the role of the corporate parent?
– What organizational linkages exist between business units, if any?
– In your opinion, does corporate advantage exist, i.e. is the sum worth more than the individual parts?

Part 2: During the acquisition
a. What are the potential synergies, if any?
b. What were the capital market’s estimates (i.e. based on share price movements) of total synergies and whether these were

captured by the acquirer?
c.Suppose that you were a member of the acquirer’s Board of Directors, what questions would you have asked during the

Board’s evaluation of the acquisition before voting for approval (or not)?
d. In your opinion, is this a good deal for the acquirer.

For you information, the second part which does NOT have to be written at the moment.

e. In your opinion, is this a good deal for the target?
f. Could this deal have been structured as a strategic alliance instead?
g. What other targets could the acquirer have considered if doing the deal today?

Part 3: After the Acquisition
a. Given the information available at the time of the acquisition, how would you have integrated the companies?
b. How did the companies plan to integrate (i.e. upon announcement)?
c. How did they actually integrate?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Between 1980 and 1987, Craig Hanson borrowed funds from Great Lakes Higher Education Corp. to finance his education

Prepare a 2–3 page, double-spaced paper explaining the three key chapters of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (7, 11, and 13), and how each chapter operates in our bankruptcy court system. Do individuals/corporations filing for bankruptcy progress through more than one of these chapters? A question you must cover in your paper concerns the effect that both petitioners’ student loans have in their bankruptcy filing. Research the Internet, and gather statistics on the number of students being forced into personal bankruptcy as a result of federal student loans.

25-9
Between 1980 and 1987, Craig Hanson borrowed funds from Great Lakes Higher Education Corp. to finance his education. Hanson defaulted on the debt in 1989, and Great Lakes obtained a judgment against him for $31,583.77. Three years later, Hanson filed a bankruptcy petition under Chapter 13. Great Lakes timely filed a proof of claim in the amount of $35,531.08. Hanson’s repayment plan proposed to pay $135 monthly to Great Lakes over 60 months, which in total was only 19 percent of the claim, but said nothing about discharging the remaining balance. The plan was confirmed without objection. After Hanson completed the payments under the plan, without any additional proof or argument being offered, the court granted discharge of his student loans. In 2003, Educational Credit Management Corp. (ECMC), which had taken over Great Lakes’ interest in the loans, filed a motion for relief from the discharge. What is the requirement for the discharge of a student loan obligation in bankruptcy? Did Hanson meet this requirement? Should the court grant ECMC’s motion? Discuss. In re Hanson, 397 F.3d (7th Cir. 2005).
25-10
Between 1988 and 1992, Lorna Nys took out student loans, totaling about $30,000, to finance an associate of arts degree in drafting from the College of the Redwoods and a bachelor of arts degree from Humboldt State University (HSU) in California. In 1996, Nys began working at HSU as a drafting technician. As a “Drafter II,” the highest-paying drafting position at HSU, Nys’s gross income in 2002 was $40,244. She was 51 years old, her net monthly income was $2,299.33, and she had $2,295.05 in monthly expenses, including saving $140 for her retirement, which she planned for age 65. When Educational Credit Management Corp. (ECMC) began to collect payments on Nys’s student loans, she filed a Chapter 7 petition in a federal bankruptcy court, seeking a discharge of the loans. ECMC argued that Nys did not show any “additional circumstances” that would impede her ability to repay. What is the standard for the discharge of student loans under Chapter 7? Does Nys meet that standard? Explain. In re Nys, 446 F.3d 938 (9th Cir. 2006).

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Summarize Case Brief 25-5 Safeco Insurance Co.v. Burr in a form known as a case brief

Summarize Case Brief 25-5 Safeco Insurance Co.v. Burr in a form known as a case brief.
For a sample of a case brief, see the (Martha Stewart Case Brief attached)

CASE Brief 25-5
Safeco Insurance Co. v. Burr
United States Supreme Court
127 S. Ct. 2201 (2007)
Safeco Insurance Company and GEICO General Insurance Company issued automobile insurance policies to three applicants without telling them that the companies had obtained credit reports on the applicants. One applicant filed a lawsuit against Safeco and two applicants sued GEICO under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Justice Souter
The Fair Credit Reporting Act requires notice to any consumer subjected to “adverse action based in whole or in part on any information contained in a consumer credit report.” Anyone who “willfully fails” to provide notice is civilly liable to the consumer. The questions in these consolidated cases are whether willful failure covers a violation committed in reckless disregard of the notice violation, and, if so, whether petitioners Safeco and GEICO committed reckless violations. We hold that reckless action is covered, that GEICO did not violate the statute, and that while Safeco might have, it did not act recklessly.
Congress enacted the Act in 1970 to ensure fair and accurate credit reporting, promote efficiency in the banking system, and protect consumer privacy. The Act requires, among other things, that “any person who takes any adverse action with respect to any consumer that is based in whole or in part on any information contained in a consumer report” must notify the affected consumer. The notice must point out the adverse action, explain how to reach the agency that reported on the consumer’s credit, and tell the consumer that he can get a free copy of the report and dispute its accuracy with the agency. As it applies to an insurance company, “adverse action” is “a denial or cancellation of, an increase in any charge for, or a reduction or other adverse or unfavorable change in the terms of coverage or amount of any insurance, existing or applied for.”
In GEICO’s case, the initial rate offered to Edo [one of the applicants] was the one he would have received if his credit score had not been taken into account, and GEICO owed him no adverse action notice under the Act.
Safeco did not give Burr and Massey (the other applicants) any notice because it thought the Act did not apply to an initial application, a mistake that left the company in violation of the statute if Burr and Massey received higher rates “based in whole or in part” on their credit reports; if they did, Safeco would be liable to them on a showing of reckless conduct (or worse). The first issue we can forget, however, for although the record does not reliably indicate what rights they would have obtained if their credit reports had not been considered, it is clear enough that if Safeco did violate the statute, the company was not reckless in falling down in its duty.
There being no indication that Congress had something different in mind, we have no reason to deviate from the common law understanding in applying the statute. Thus, a company subject to the Act does not act in reckless disregard of it unless the action is not only a violation under a reasonable reading of the statute’s terms, but shows that the company ran a risk of violating the law substantially greater than the risk associated with a reading that was merely careless. Here, there is no need to pinpoint the negligence/recklessness line, for Safeco’s reading of the statute, albeit erroneous, was not objectively unreasonable.
Reversed, in favor of defendant and remanded.
The Court of Appeals correctly held that reckless disregard of a requirement of the Act would qualify as a willful violation within the meaning of the Act. But there was no need for that court to remand the cases for factual development. GEICO’s decision to issue no adverse action notice to Edo was not a violation of the Act, and Safeco’s misreading of the statute was not reckless. The judgments of the Court of Appeals are therefore reversed in both cases, which are remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
CRITICAL THINKING ABOUT THE LAW
Very early in our lives, most of us are told that “ignorance of the law is no excuse.” Are Safeco and GEICO being permitted to violate the law on the ground that they were unaware of the meaning of the law?
• 1. Express the legal rule in this case in a manner that addresses the Court’s apparent understanding of reckless disregard of a statute.
• Clue: Does Justice Souter believe that reckless disregard constitutes violation of a statute? When would disregard become reckless?

• 2. What facts would have made this case go in favor of the plaintiffs?
o Clue: Construct a set of facts under which each insurance company would have violated the statute.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Effective disciplinary strategies and methods

Effective disciplinary strategies and method.
research an article from an professional or online journal. APA style 6th edition

first paragraph is a summary of the article
second paragraph is an analysis of what the article the article is about
and third paragraph is your application or how it can be used, or how this information can be used, or how important it is.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Mode-Based Vulnerability Analysis

In this activity, you will review a specific critical infrastructure (Level 1) for risk using the MBVA model.

Select a specific Level 1 critical infrastructure used in this module (water in Norfolk, Virginia) and review it for risk using the MBVA model. You may want to focus on a specific sector in your hometown or one that you deem in need of analysis. Use the steps outlined in module 4 to assess the risk. Upon completion of the risk analysis scoring, propose actions or activities that will reduce the risk/vulnerability of the infrastructure. The final paper should show all calculations in the MBVA risk model and include an introduction, summary of your findings, and conclusion where you suggest actions or activities to reduce the risk.
1. Take Inventory: What assets do you have to consider within the scope of the analysis?
2. Perform Network Analysis: Is the network scale-free? Small world? Which are the critical nodes?
3. Construct Fault Tree: Identify vulnerabilities, model the sector using logic gates, and assign probabilities (none, low, medium, high, certain).
4. Derive the Event Tree: Combine all combinations of events and compute probabilities of possible outcomes.
5. Compute Allocation Strategy: Using budgets, cost estimates, and damage estimates.

MBVA is a four stage process:
• The first stage is the network model. We’ve already seen that we can model sectors or parts of sectors as networks of nodes and links. In order to do this, you have to understand how the sector works so you can correctly identify what the nodes and links should be. These are the assets of the sector. The outputs from this stage are the node histogram and the critical nodes or hubs in the network.
• The second stage is the fault analysis. The inputs here are the vulnerabilities, the logic that connects the assets in the sector together, and the probabilities of faults for each vulnerability. Here, we build the fault tree. This is the stage where it is most critical that you understand how the sector works. If you don’t understand how the different parts of a sector operate, you’re almost certain to build a poor fault tree.
• Next, in the third stage, we create the event tree from the fault tree. From this stage we obtain an identification of the threat combinations that we care about the most and the probabilities associated with these (Lewis, 2006).
• Finally, the fourth stage is where we reduce fault or risk to reveal a resource allocation strategy. During this stage, we need to identify what our working budget is, what the costs are if any vulnerability were to be exploited, and lastly, what the damage costs would be to repair that asset if it were successfully attacked (Lewis, 2006).

The final stage of the MBVA process is step five – computing the allocation strategy. Here, the cost and damage estimates are taken to produce an investment strategy for reducing vulnerability or risk. There are eight analytical tools used to complete the MBVA process. The following summary illustrates these eight tools:
1. MBVA Step 5: This final step defines how best to allocate a given budget.
2. Network-Wide Investment: The components of a critical infrastructure network are nodes and links. Asks the question, “What is the best way to allocate funding to nodes and links such that the risk to the entire sector is minimized?”
3. Ranked Allocation: The most common strategy used by practitioners. It funds the highest-ranking components first, the second-highest next, and so on, until funding no longer remains.
4. Apportioned Allocation: A method of allocating limited funds to protect the infrastructure by reducing the likelihood that faults occur across the entire fault tree.
5. Optimal Allocation: The overall fault tree; it may or may not be the same as the other strategies.
6. Manual Allocation: Computes the vulnerability or risk that results when allocation is performed by hand.
7. Network Analysis: Demonstrates that the best allocation strategy for a network is to fund the highest-degreed and highest-valued nodes, and diminish funding of links to zero.
8. FTplus: The FTplus program calculates how much of the budget to allocate to each vulnerability given in the form of a fault tree. It computes the event tree outcomes, applies one of four allocation strategies, and produces an allocation.
In critical infrastructure protection, there is no clear-cut solution as to how to best protect critical sectors. For that reason, the final step of the MBVA process allows for various strategies that may be applied to specific sector scenarios. Basically, this final step requires the derivation of an investment strategy that removes or diminishes the likelihood of faults occurring. Knowing how much money to spend on each threat to minimize the probability of faults occurring is the closest we can get to risk reduction. In the end, it is a policy decision. As Lewis (2006) states, “all of these policy decisions come with a price tag”.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Article review: Identifying the risks towards critical information and communications technology infrastructure

Write the full citation of the journal article.
Summarize the key points and findings in the article.
Discuss the relationship of the article to course material, and if applicable, how it relates to criminal justice components.
Analyze the article from your own viewpoint.
What are your thoughts and opinions?
How can you support your views with course material as well as outside material?
What questions does the article raise that you would like to explore further?
Use the APA style (6th edition) for writing, editing, and citing your assignment. Make sure that all in text citation include the correct page numbers.

Lewis, T. G. (2006). Critical infrastructure protection in homeland security: Defending a networked nation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Tudose, M. (2012). Identifying the risks towards critical information and communications technology infrastructure. Buletin Stiintific, 17(1), 77-85. Retrieved from https://eds.b.ebscohost.com.vlib.excelsior.edu/eds/detail?vid=2&sid=78114685-480d-479b-a62a-b8df58eda5ef%40sessionmgr114&hid=106&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#db=a9h&AN=77695104

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]