Based on your reading of relevant Vatican documents and other literature, argue your understanding of the purpose of Catholic schools in the context of discussions around Catholic culture and identity in contemporary Australian society.
|
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]| Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to provide students with practice in identifying, reading, and critiquing systematic research reviews related to nursing. A systematic review is defined as “A summary of evidence, typically conducted by an expert or expert panel on a particular topic, that uses a rigorous process (to minimize bias) for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing studies to answer a specific clinical question and draw conclusions about the data gathered (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2011, p. 582). Course Outcomes Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to (CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination the research findings from nursing and related disciplines. (CO 4) Compare and critique quantitative and qualitative designs and methodologies for research studies. (PO 4, 7, 9, 11) Total Points Possible: 175 Points REQUIREMENTS: 1. Describe the relevance of the nursing research problem addressed in a SRR to practice. (CO 3, 6) 2. Critique the levels of evidence of the studies used in the SRR, specifically the designs of the studies included. (CO 6) 3. Critique the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued. (CO 6) 4. Describe the overall findings of the studies, as summarized in the SRR. (CO 3, 6) 5. Critique the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for your current practice and future research. (CO 3, 6) 6. Utilize the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to locate a true SRR for this assignment. 7. Paper length should be between 4-6 pages. PREPARING THE PAPER Consult your faculty member if you are uncertain about whether your article is a true SRR. If it is not, your grade will be affected because you will not be able to address all of the above objectives. Important: Submit a copy of the systematic research review that you are critiquing as a separate document before submitting your paper. This will help Turnitin from returning a high similarity percentage on your written work. Remember to keep Turnitin similarity to 24% or less or you will be deducted points on APA. PLEASE DONT FORGET TO SEND ME A COPY OF THE SRR article you’re working on, I need to submit that too. Also pay close attention to the details of the paper. Thanks. The top ten writer aspect should be free as it says on your home page. Thanks in advance |
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Critically evaluate J. S. Mill’s argument for liberty and toleration. 1000 words
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]-12 pt. font size -Times New Roman -double-spaced Respond to one of the readings from the textbook White By Law 10th Edition by Ian Haney-Lopez: Ch.1 (White Lines) or Ch.2 (Racial Restrictions in the Law of Citizenship). Do not simple summarize the article
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]| Research question: What are the challenges that the Malaysian politics is facing to fits into the Western definition of liberal democracy and in what ways has Malaysia failed? Research thesis: Although Malaysian politics has certain elements of democracy, there are also consist of certain authoritarian features that caused by the ethnic and social conflicts. Please refer to the research question and thesis for this literature review. This is an ARGUMENTATIVE review of the list of articles below. Please use only these articles: 1- Freedom of Speech and Democracy in Malaysia, Mohd Azizuddin Mohd Sani April 2008: 85-104. 2- The Myth of Asian-Style Democracy, Steven J. Hood, Sep 1998: 853-866. 3- Low-quality democracy and varied authoritarianism: elites and regimes in Southeast Asia today, William Case, July 2007: 255-269. 4- A Nation in Distress: Human Rights, Authoritarianism, and Asian Values in Malaysia, Wan A. Manan, 1999: 359-381. 5- The limits of civil society in democratising the state: the malaysian case, Azeem Fazwan Ahmad Farouk, 2011: 91-109. 6- Democratisation and the prospects for participatory regionalism in Southeast Asia, Amitav Acharya, 2003: 375-390. 7- Malaysia: Bogey of Racial Tension, Kalpana Sharma, Dec 19, 1987: 2203-2204. 8- Semi-democracy in Malaysia: Withstanding the pressures for regime change, William Case, Summer 1993: 183-205. 9- Asian Style democracy, Clark D. Neher, Nov 1994: 949-961. 10- The ethnic security dilemma: evidence from malaysia, Alan Collins, Dec 1998, Vol. 20, Issue 3. Referring to these list of articles above, explain in details how these articles fit into the research question and thesis and answer the research question and thesis. Spend ONLY 3-4 sentences on introduction and conclusion. FOCUS ON THE BODY PARAGRAPH. |
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]| Any goods in possession of an insolvent estate that are subject to fixed charges or a proprietary right belong to the legal owner and cannot be used by the liquidator to satisfy company debts. Critically analyse whether the reforms in the Enterprise Act 2002 go far enough in promoting a rescue culture by curtailing the rights of the legal owner to claim their property on the event of insolvency, or is more reform needed? OSCOLA REFRENCE only Please do bibliography properly , seperate the case , books , journals , articles , webs etc. |
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]| Read: Preface; correspondence; e-mail; memos; letters. “All writing occurs in a context and involves a number of choices,” writes Margaret Woodworth in her essay on the Rhetorical Precis. The idea behind this assignment is for you become close readers of the assigned entries and to be able to comment in a precise way on the important features of the chapter(s). For each of the five odd numbered weeks, you will write summaries of some of the sections you have read in the book (I will tell you which ones to write on for any given week). These summaries are called precis statements or just precis (pronounced pray-see). Each week’s precis (no matter how many you write that week) are worth a total of 20 points. This week, you have five precis to write, one each for the sections you read (see above). The rhetorical precis form is a highly structured four-sentence paragraph that records the essential rhetorical elements of a unit of spoken or written discourse. To do these well, you must concisely summarize important information, an important skill for a writer. The precis has four sentences, and each sentence has a specific purpose and form. The Rhetorical Precis Form: 1. Name of author, genre and title of the work, date in parenthesis; a rhetorically accurate verb (such as “asserts,” “argues,” “suggests,” “claims,” “implies,” and so on); and a THAT clause containing the major assertion (thesis statement ) of the work. 2. An explanation of how the author develops and/or supports the thesis, usually in chronological order. 3. A statement of the author’s apparent purpose, followed by an “in order” phrase. 4. A description of the intended audience and/or the relationship the author establishes with the audience.The following is an example of a precis statement written about a different work, by a different author. The format, though, of each sentence and the overall precis is accurate, so it gives you a good idea of what a finished precis looks like. Charles S. Peirce’s article, “The Fixation of Belief (1877), asserts that humans have psychological and social mechanisms designed to protect and cement (or “fix”) our beliefs. Peirce backs this claim up with descriptions of four methods of fixing belief, pointing out the effectiveness and potential weaknesses of each method. Peirce’s purpose is to point out the ways that people commonly establish their belief systems in order to jolt the awareness of the reader into considering how their own belief system may the product of such methods and to consider what Peirce calls “the method of science” (4) as a progressive alternative to the other three. Given the technical language used in the article, Peirce is writing to a well-educated audience with some knowledge of philosophy and history and a willingness to other ways of thinking. Because you’re only writing about sections of a book, your own precis will look a little different, perhaps more like this: Gerald J. Alred, Charles T. Brusaw, and Walter E. Oliu, in their textbook Handbook of Technical Writing (11th ed.), argue that e-mail should be treated as seriously as other correspondence because . . . A further requirement for this course is that each precis you write includes at least one quote from the chapter you are summarizing, as was done in the linked example above in the third sentence. I ask this for two reasons: first, to be sure you’re actually reading the book as required; second, to get used to citing information in your writing. If you look at the structure of a precis, you’ll see that it tells who the writer is, who the audience is, and what the relationship is between the two. It explains the what, how and why of the original document. In short, in the shortest possible space, it tells the reader a great deal of information about the summarized document. This is the very essence of good, concise writing: using no more words than necessary while not missing any important details. Length: Although you are writing five precis statements this week (one for the Preface and one each for the four other sections) they should be submitted as one document, one assignment, with five paragraphs, each with four sentences. |
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]| Homework, Paper II: Prison Populations and Inmates With Mental Illnesses Length: Three to five complete pages (not including cover page or reference page) Format: Standard APA format (1 in. margins, 12-point font, double spacing, in-text citations to support your references) References: Minimum of three peer-reviewed outiside academic resources, not including the textbook or web pages Directions: First, research how inmates with mental illnesses are managed in prisons in general, and choose three topics to write about on that subject. You are free to explore any prison mental health topics, such as diagnostics and classification, suicide watches, correctional officer training for supervising inmates with mental illnesses, and so forth. Then for each of these three same topics, research your own state (ohio) and include how your state handles these issues. Compare and contrast your state’s prison mental health system with your research. rubric CRMJ320 Grading Rubric QUALITY OF CONTENT: 70% of points ORGANIZATION AND COHESIVENESS OF WORK: 20% of points PROPER APA CITATION, GRAMMAR, AND SPELLING: 10% of points NOTE: Point deductions beyond the percentages noted above can be made for work that does not meetthe assignment requirements or if uncited material is present. |
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]| W6 Assignment 1 Debate the utility of the knowledge of nursing theories and associated theoretical concepts in the process of assessing patient’s needs and implementing appropriate care. Grading Criteria Maximum Points Discussion Question Responses: Displays an understanding of the course materials and the underlying concept discussed. Includes course materials and additional scholarly resources to support important points. 15 Participation Responses: Displays an understanding of topic under discussion by affirming statements, asking a related question, or making an oppositional statement. Position must be supported with related evidence. Responds to a minimum of two peers per question. 10 Professional Practice Connection: Demonstrates reflective thought pertaining to personal perspectives and professional development. Reflective statements include a theoretical rationale. 10 Quality of Academic Writing: Written responses are free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. Citations and references are included and written in the correct APA Style. 10 Total: 45 |
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]| I would like the work I have so far to be structured and formatted, as well as parts to be added to some of the chapters |
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]