Nietzsche claims that language is inherently rhetorical and that all our concepts are really tropes. Take 2-3 tropes from a particular field (in science, the arts, or politics) and describe how these tropes work rhetorically. If you believe these tropes help us understand the field better, say so and justify your claim.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]The request is to summarize chapter one through four of my dissertation. Ii have included the specific outline with the explanation of what each section should reflect. Use a minuium of 50 of the references in Literature Review and other sections in the summary in conjunction with the findings in chapter 4.
SEE BELOW:
Introduction
Summary of the Findings
Discussion of the Findings
Discussion of the Findings in Relation to the Literature
Limitations
Implication of the Findings for Practice
Recommendations for Further Research
Conclusion
Introduction
Prepare an introduction to your Chapter 5 that (a) explains the purpose of the study, (b)
briefly identify the methodology and research design, (c) informs your reader about what
Chapter 5 will do [its purpose], (d) orients your reader to how Chapter 5 is organized, and (de
describes how the chapter fits into the overall dissertation.
Summary of the Findings
In this section clearly, accurately, concisely, and objectively summarize the results [for
quantitative studies] or findings [for qualitative studies]. Be reader-based in developing this key
section. As a general rule of thumb using a “general-to-specific pattern” works well in
summarizing your results so they are easily understood. You can do this by beginning each
paragraph with a general statement of your results followed by the details that support it. For
quantitative studies organize this section by the research questions. For qualitative studies the
section can be organized thematically or by answering the research questions sequentially.
Avoid interpretations in this section, which you can offer in the discussion section that follows.
Discussion of the Findings
In this section interpret the results or findings and qualify your interpretation with the related literature [research and theory]. What do the results or findings mean? What do the
study’s results or findings mean in light the practitioner’s practice problem or theoretical debate
or controversy that drove the need for the study? What do the study’s results or findings mean in light of existing findings in the field? What might the results of findings mean? Where the research questions adequately answered? Why did the study’s results or findings turn out the way they did?
Sometimes a study’s analysis and results fail to support for the hypothesis or the results
only partially answer the research question(s). Provide an explanation of any unanticipated
results. Often when the study’s results are not expected, a researcher will use the literature to
find analogous situations and frame a plausible explanation. Or was it something about the
research design such as a limitation or methodological flaw that accounts for the unanticipated
outcome? Sometimes the researcher must make a best estimate [e.g., one possible explanation
for . . . is . . . ]. When the hypothesis is not supported or only a partial answer is obtained, what
are the implications regarding the value or clarity of the original research question(s)? Should
similar further research not be recommended or should the research questions be modified in
further studies?
Discussion of the Results in Relation to the Literature
Discuss the relationship between the results or findings and the literature. Throughout chapter 5 there should be citations drawing connections between what the results or findings and the work of other scholars.
Relationship between the Results and the Theoretical or Conceptual Framework
One of the critical competencies of conducting research is to advance theory through
testing, extending, refining, evaluating or challenging theory or a conceptual framework. How
did the findings confirm or disconfirm theoretical concepts, assumptions or expectations? If a
conceptual framework was used in place of theory, did the results confirm or disconfirm the
assumptions or expectations of that conceptual framework? What are the theoretical
ramifications resulting from your study’s results or findings?
Relationship between the Results and the Literature Reviewed After connecting the findings to the theoretical or conceptual framework, discuss the relationship between the findings and the literature reviewed? Did the literature reviewed in Chapter 2 align with and support the findings? Why or why not? If new relevant literature was reviewed after Chapter 2 was written and there is a connection or support between the findings and that literature not included in Chapter 2, include a discussion of it here.
Limitations
Having conducted and considered the results or findings, you should be able to see the
study from a new perspective regarding the limitations of the study. In other words you the
should now have additional insight regarding the scope of the study, what it achieved and could
not achieve, and the interpretation and implications of the findings in terms of what the findings
can and cannot provide. Please note also that design limitations are a common cause of
unexpected results. Describe the study’s limitations. Your critical assessment in this section
should lead to improvements that could be applied in future research.
Implication of the Findings for Practice
Identify the implications for practice. Please note though that not all educational studies will have implications or recommendations for practice. Any implications or suggestions or calls for change should be drawn directly from and supported by your study’s results of findings. Also before making a generalization to the population at large from which the sample was drawn, consider the size, corresponding confidence levels and intervals, and representativeness of your sample. When discussing practice implications from the findings from a qualitative study, which lacks the sample size to generalize, use common sense and make recommendations for change judiciously. Ensure those recommendations are drawn directly from the findings.
Recommendations for Further Research
Make recommendations for further research that are needed and that have arisen from but were not incorporated in the study or supported by the data. Recommendations, if applicable, can be made to complete the research cycle or agenda.
Conclusion
In this section provide a final summary of the answers to the research question and
provide closure to the dissertation as a whole.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Read the Rubic and previously submitted paper before starting this essay.
You have already developed a thesis statement and developed an outline in which you explored two (2) real-life international incidentsfrom the past five (5) years involving the United States as they received an elevated status as a world power. Now you will develop the final paper in which you explore your main points in detail.
Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:
Introduce your paper with your previously crafted thesis statement.
Identify two to three (2-3) international events from the past five years that can be traced back to a foreign policy created after the Civil War.
Discuss three (3) aspects of US history since 1865 that has led to the US’s rise as a world super power policeman.
Identify three to five (3-5) international incidents since World War II where America has taken on a policing role.
Determine three to five (3-5) driving forces that fueled international policy decisions involving the international incidents you outlined previously. (Consider treaties, exit strategies, elections, wars, etc.)
Use at least three (3) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not quality as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Analyze the rise of the United States to a world “superpower” and how that status has shaped its internal developments in recent decades.
Recognize the major turning points in American history since the Civil War.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in contemporary U.S. history.
Write clearly and concisely about contemporary U.S. history using proper writing mechanics.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]All papers must be typed in Times New Roman 12 point font with 1” margins and page numbers. You must include proper citations in Chicago Manual Style, a bibliography, and reproduction(s) of discussed work(s).
Drawing from one major figure or movement presented during the survey students are asked to write a research paper discussing key themes of the readings and connecting them to a specific example of art production.
A research paper is one, which is engaged with the discussions and materials presented in class in a way that is critical and informed. Students are asked to establish examples, relations, tensions and critical annotations to the readings and concepts discussed. Your research should involve a set of artistic artifacts and a set of specific themes relevant to the social history of Latin America. Successful papers will present an engagement with the polemics and open questions visited during the survey and demonstrate a formal interpretation and analysis of the art objects. 7-9 pages.
Choose one of the following examples of art production presented in lecture and/or discussed in the readings: (these examples can be expanded to other cases presented in readings and class if the student demonstrates knowledge and research of the chosen artist and art objects). You can choose to extend your previous short paper into a research paper, or you can choose one of the following themes:
Estridentismo
The Mexican School of Mural Painting
Diego Rivera
Wifredo Lam
The “Surrealist” in Latin America: Rufino Tamayo, Manuel Alvarez Bravo, Carlos Merida, Frida Kahlo, Maria Izquierdo, Hector Hyppolite, Roberto Matta, Leonora Carrington, Remedios Varo, Maya Deren.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Education. Literature review: To what extent are novice teachers equipped to manage high level classroom behaviour in Australian High Schools
The focus of this proposal is on novice teachers and high level of behaviour.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Overview
For this assignment, you will write an essay within 1,500 words in which you discuss the causal theory and the results of multivariate linear regression analysis based on one of the case cross-section observational study of multivariate linear regression analysis provided.
Construct a causal theory that explains the dependent variable used in the case with one independent variable as the main causal variable of your theory.
Then assume that this case study is the result of your empirical study, and write an essay, which reports and discusses your theory and the result of your empirical analysis.
The goal of this assignment is to deepen your understanding on linear regression analysis through interpreting and discussing a linear regression result as an empirical test of your causal theory.
Requirements
The requirements are as follows:
1. Within 1,500 words.
2. Write the case study number of the case you have chosen (e.g., “Case Study A1”) at the beginning of your essay (e.g. next to the title or your name).
3. In addition to concise yet informative introduction and conclusion, your essay should have the following three distinguishable parts: i) Theory, ii) Empirical Analysis, and iii)
Discussion.
4. In the Theory part of your essay, you should address the followings:
(a) An elaboration of your causal theory with a focus on a single independent variable and its causal mechanism.
(b) A clear causal hypothesis based on your theory to be tested by a linear regression model.
5. In the Empirical Analysis part of your essay, you should address the followings:
(1) A discussion on control variables — independent variables included in the analysis other than the main causal variable for your theory — in particular, why it is appropriate to include these variables as controls.
(2) A presentation and interpretation of the results of a multivariate linear regression analysis — in particular, the relationship between the dependent and the independent variables (both your main causal variable and control variables).
6. In the Discussion part of your essay, you should address the followings:
(1) The question of reverse causality/simultaneity.
(2) The potential problem of omitted confounding variables.
(3) How the results of your empirical research should be interpreted (e.g., Is a causal conclusion sufficiently drawn? Is there any reservation in interpreting the results?).
7. In this essay assignment, a linear regression analysis is used as a tool of descriptive statistics — the method to examine the data at hand. It is not used as a tool of statistical inference — the method to estimate the relationship among variables in the population. You are not expected to apply the knowledge of statistical inference in this essay.
8. A table of the linear regression result should be included in your essay. You may edit the table given in the case studies.
9. No additional research or readings are required for this assignment. However, you will need to give appropriate citations and references, if you cite a passage, use ideas, or base your argument on ideas from other sources.
Some of these requirements are further elaborated below.
Requirement 4. The variables included in a linear regression in the case studies are observables— variables that have been already operationalized. So the theory that you will propose should be stated in general concepts corresponding to the operationalized variables used in the case study.
Requirement 5 – (1). You should discuss if these control variables are confounding variables for your theory. If you argue that they are, you need to elaborate why they should be considered confounding variables. If they are not confounding variables, you need to argue that they are other important causal variables to explain the dependent variables. You need to discuss appropriate causal mechanisms for these variables.
Requirement 5 – (2). You should interpret the coefficient for each independent variable, and then discuss the substantive significance of the main independent variable of your causal theory. When discussing the substantive significance, you need to make an argument rather than merely reporting the computation results.
Findings
The null finding in which your causal theory is not supported by the empirical analysis is acceptable for this essay assignment. Even when the finding is contradictory to your causal theory, you may still write the essay to report that finding. In this case, you should discuss a possible reason why you have found a contradictory result and what it means to the future research on the causal theory that you have proposed. What matters is whether you provide a reasonable, convincing, clear and logical argument based on your theory and empirical analysis.
Format
– Your essay should be within the word count specified above. Footnotes, references or
bibliography, and titles and notes of your graphs and figures are not included in this word
count.
– Your essay should have a concise yet informative introduction and conclusion.
– Sectioning and sub-sectioning are recommended to effectively organize your essay and
communicate your argument to readers. How you effectively organize your essay will be part of the evaluation.
– Your essay should use standard fonts, such as Times New Roman in 12-point font, and be double-spaced.
– Figures and tables should be placed where they are discussed. If your discussion refers to the same figure or table multiple times, you don’t need to insert it every time it’s referred. Placing it where it is mentioned for the first time is sufficient.
– Number your figures and tables and give an informative title, such as “Figure 1. Title of the Figure” and “Table 1. Title of the Table.” You should use their numbers, such as Figure 1 and Table 1, when you refer to them in your discussion.
– Use footnotes rather than endnotes, if you have something that should be stated but is not appropriate to be included in the body of your essay.
– You need to give appropriate citations and references, if you cite a passage, use ideas, or base your argument on ideas from other sources.
– You may use any citation format as long as it is consistently applied throughout the paper.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Please choose one of the following prompts and write a short response.
Your response should be typed (12 point font) and should be one page long. Please use Arial or Times New Roman font. Assignment is to express yourself cogently with little to no grammatical and spelling mistakes.
1. Orientalism and its effects on both Western and Eastern societies are a key theme in the Season of Migration to the North and Only in London. Pick a character from either text and explain how he or she relies on Western stereotypes of the Near East to interact with West in London. Students may link their analysis of a character and draw upon how Orientalism affects the post-colonial world whether drawing upon films, news, or appearances of Orientalism within their own personal experiences.
2.Setting is a very important in Midaq Alley and we can in fact learn a
lot about this novel’s characters through the attitudes they have about
living in Midaq Alley. Please choose at least two characters and compare
the attitudes they have about Midaq Alley. What does this reveal about
these characters?
3.While setting is very important and in many ways distinct in Midaq
Alley, the film Callejon de los Milagros show us how “midaq alleys” may
exist elsewhere in the world. What characteristics of Midaq Alley may be
applied universally and how is this shown in Callejon de los Milagros?
4.Existentialist themes are prevalent in the London-centered texts of Season of Migration to the North and Only in London. Pick a character from either text and explain how the individual grapples his or her development through acts of their own will.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]For this research paper, it would be better to begin with some statements by the book “The Happiness Advantage”. We need at least 6 outside sources that pertain to the topic “Happiness and Money”. Also I have some specific basic requirement in the following document. Thanks for reading.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]The point you’re trying to use as your argument is far too general, and as a result, your body paragraphs deliver facts with little analysis and no clear explanation of how they connect or how they’re relevant to the main idea of the essay. This is going to require substantial revision for the portfolio to incorporate a stronger argumentative and analytical framework. You should start by narrowing your focus to help you argue something more specific, then you should move on to trying to give more specific and more well-developed support and make sure you follow it up with analysis.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]In the expression, “The end justifies the means,” the end is the outcome or result and the means is what one does to achieve the outcome or result. If the end is something that is good or right, then does that end justify any means you might use to get there? With respect to working conditions, for example, some might say that the hazards present in the meatpacking industry are justified by the cost-effective production that results. Google “meat packing industry problems” for some background information on this issue.
Who are the stakeholders in this question?
Are the hazardous working conditions in this industry justified? Or not?
Explain your position.
Cite Reference in text. Place reference in APA format on separate page.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]