Econometric: international differences in income per capita are best understood using an [economic] growth model

In a popular paper published in 1992 by the Quarterly Journal of
Economics (QJE), Gregory Mankiw, David Romer and David Weil
(MRW) conclude that:
“international differences in income per capita are best understood
using an [economic] growth model [where] output is produced from
physical capital, human capital, and labor, and is used for investment
in physical capital, investment in human capital, and consumption.”
(Mankiw et al. 1992 , p. 432)
Using the Eviews/GRETL dataset attached, carefully explain the
empirical evidence MRW provide in support in of their thesis. In
the light of this econometric analysis, do you share the authors’
conclusion above ?
Answer in about 1500 words (all included).

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

how could you create opportunities to express creativity in classroom?

Creativity in autistic kids
****************************
* As a teacher, how could you create opportunities to express creativity in classroom?
* In What way could teachers foster creativity in autistic children in the classroom?

Some things that I will assess as I read your essays that develop your thinking around an issue or problem of practice that you want to explore further. Your job is to FIND targeted literature using the guidelines of the librarian, READ the material with a critical eye to the validity and usefulness of findings, INTEGRATE this set of literature into your essay to clarify, challenge or critique your own conceptual understandings.
Shows your own thinking about a few key concepts of interest chosen as possible Action Research focus for 6910
Organization integrates your knowledge about the reading into a critical analysis of topic
Meaning and content: the degree of meaty substance; how you described what you culled from your reading in the literature reviewed
Number of articles; quality and relevance of what you reviewed (used library tools)
Writing quality: degree of professional style/register, academic voice appropriate to teacher research; clarity of expression
APA form / uses subheads to organize in a logical way
Provides enough detail to demonstrate a close reading of the materials
Concludes with implications for practice

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Checkpoint Assignment for BUS 180, Principles of Economics

The Critical Assignment of BUS 180, Principles of Economics course is part of a series of assignments designed to enhance students’ knowledge and skills in integration and implementation of a business plan during their four years undergraduate business program.
The specific objective of the Critical Assignment of BUS 180 is to enhance students’ knowledge and skills in evaluating and assessing the market structure for a start up business that they will develop. This exercise will provide the students with the opportunity of integration and implementation of theory to practice and will prepare them in development of a comprehensive business plan during their senior year in the capstone course.

In BUS 180, each student will experience creating a start- up business to produce a specific product (a good or service). A three to five (3-5) page written research paper on the start- up business, the product and the market structure of the industry is required. The paper needs to present sections on the product information, this may be a good (tangible product) or a service (intangible product); and the initial and potential scope of the market in which the product will be supplied.

In addition, the written paper should have sections on the degree of the existing competition and the characteristics of the rival producers/organizations; the characteristics of the buyers and the potential demand for the product; and the strategy of the start- up business for pricing with regards to elasticity, production and maintaining it’s competitive advantage. Finally, a critical analysis of the findings and conclusion and the implications for the start-up business need to be addressed in the paper.

The specific components of the proposed start up business should include:
• Product description
• Scope of the market
• Market Structure
• Degree of competition, availability of substitute and barriers to entry
• Potential demand
• Elasticity
• Industry Trends

The written plan should specifically address the following:
a. Product and the initial and future scope of the market (local, national, international/global) intends to serve.
b. Market structure, degree of competition and the availability of substitutes initially and in the future, locally and globally for the proposed product.
c. Various barriers to entry to the market in which the proposed business will compete.
d. Demand and buyers of the proposed product.
e. Price, income and cross elasticity of demand for the proposed product and their influence on the various pricing and production strategies of the proposed business.
f. Current and future industry trends of the proposed business.

The written paper is to be typed double–spaced, 1’ margins, Times New Roman and 12-point font, with correct spelling and grammar, proper citation, references, with a cover page and organized with headings. The instructor’s approval of the topic is required.

The following Library resources and web-sites could assist students in conducting the research to do the Critical Assignment:

Lynn Library Sources
Academic OneFile
Academic Search Premier
Biography In Context
Business Source Complete
Datamonitor
General Business File ASAP
Hoover’s Company Profiles
LexisNexis
ProQuest (ABI/INFORM )
Reference USA & OneSource

Web-sites
Global Issues in Context
Regional Business News
www.bls.gov
www.makinac.org
www.ftc.gov
www.census.gov
https://wc.wustl.edu

Student learning outcomes
Students will be able to:
a. Specifically identify the product and the initial and future scope of the market (local, national, international/global) intends to serve. (SLO 2.3, SLO 5.12 )
b. Recognize and evaluate the market structure, degree of competition and the availability of substitutes initially and in the future, locally and globally for the proposed product. (SLO 1.4, SLO 5.12)
c. Identify the various barriers to entry to the market in which the proposed business will compete. (SLO 2.1, SLO 1.4, SLO 6.1, SLO 5.12)
d. Evaluate and specify the potential demand and buyers of the proposed product. (SLO 1.4,
SLO 5.5, SLO 2.11)
e. Identify the degree of price, income and cross elasticity of demand for the proposed product and their influence on the various pricing and production strategies of the proposed business.
(SLO 1.4, SLO 5.5, SLO 1.6, SLO 2.11)
f. Specifically evaluate the current and future industry trends of the proposed business. (SLO 2.3)

Rubric for BUS 180 Checkpoint Assignment
Learning Outcomes
4
3
2
1
0

Specifically identify the product and the initial and future scope of the market (local, national, international/
global) intends to serve. (SLO 2.3, SLO 5.12 )

Summary thoroughly describes the product and the initial and future scope of the market (local, national, international/global) intends to serve.
Summary describes the product and the initial and future scope of the market (local, national, international/global) intends to serve.

Summary demonstrated some insight into the product and the initial and future scope of the market (local, national, international/global) intends to serve.
Summary demonstrates minimal description of the product and the initial and future scope of the market (local, national, international/global) intends to serve.
Summary does not demonstrate description of product and the initial and future scope of the market (local, national, international/global) intends to serve.
Recognize and evaluate the market structure, degree of competition and the availability of substitutes initially and in the future, locally and globally for the proposed product.
(SLO 1.4, SLO 5.12)
Summary thoroughly describes the market structure, degree of competition and the availability of substitutes initially and in the future, locally and globally for the proposed product.
Summary describes the market structure, degree of competition and the availability of substitutes initially and in the future, locally and globally for the proposed product
Summary demonstrated some insight into the market structure, degree of competition and the availability of substitutes initially and in the future, locally and globally for the proposed product.
Summary demonstrates minimal description of the market structure, degree of competition and the availability of substitutes initially and in the future, locally and globally for the proposed product.
Summary does not demonstrate minimal description of the market structure, degree of competition and the availability of substitutes initially and in the future, locally and globally for the proposed product.
Identify the various barriers to entry to the market structure in which the proposed business will compete.
(SLO 2.1, SLO 1.4, SLO 6.1, SLO 5.12)
Summary demonstrates significant insight into the various barriers to entry to the market structure in which the proposed business will compete.
Summary demonstrates insight into the various barriers to entry to the market structure in which the proposed business will compete.
Summary demonstrates some insight into the various barriers to entry to the market structure in which the proposed business will compete.
Summary demonstrates minimal insight into the various barriers to entry to the market structure in which the proposed business will compete.
Summary does not demonstrate the various barriers to entry to the market structure in which the proposed business will compete.
Evaluate and specify the potential demand and buyers of the proposed product.
(SLO 1.4, SLO
5.5, SLO 2.11)

Evaluation and specification of potential demand and buyers of the proposed product demonstrates significant insight.

Evaluation and specification of potential demand and buyers of the proposed product demonstrates insight.

Evaluation and specification of potential demand and buyers of the proposed product demonstrates some insight.
Evaluation and specification of potential demand and buyers of the proposed product demonstrates minimal insight.
Evaluation and specification of potential demand and buyers of the proposed product does not demonstrate any insight.
Identify the degree of price, income and cross elasticity of demand for the proposed product and their influence on the various pricing and production strategies of the proposed business.
(SLO 1.4, SLO 5.5, SLO 1.6, SLO 2.11)

Summary represents comprehensive information on the degree of price, income and cross elasticity of demand for the proposed product and their influence on the various pricing and production strategies of the proposed business.

Summary represents information on the degree of price, income and cross elasticity of demand for the proposed product and their influence on the various pricing and production strategies of the proposed business.

Summary represents some information on the degree of price, income and cross elasticity of demand for the proposed product and their influence on the various pricing and production strategies of the proposed business is adequate.
Demonstration of knowledge of the degree of price, income and cross elasticity of demand for the proposed product and their influence on the various pricing and production strategies of the proposed business is inadequate.
Summary does not represent information on the degree of price, income and cross elasticity of demand for the proposed product and their influence on the various pricing and production strategies of the proposed business.
Specifically evaluate the current and future industry trend for the proposed business. (SLO 2.3)

Evaluation of the current and future industry trend for the proposed business demonstrates significant insight.

Evaluation of the current and future industry trend for the proposed business demonstrates insight.

Evaluation of the current and future industry trend for the proposed business is adequate.
Evaluation of the current and future industry trend for the proposed business is minimal.
Evaluation of the current and future industry trend for the proposed business is inadequate.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

write a brief critical review of John McWhorter’s new book The Language Hoax: Why the World Looks the Same in Any Language

Book Review
All students are required to write a brief critical review of John McWhorter’s new book The Language Hoax: Why the World Looks the Same in Any Language.

REVIEW PARAMETERS:

Recommended length: 5–6 pages

Format: typed, double-spaced, title and section headings, 1-inch margins, 12-point text, 10-point footnotes. Make sure pages are numbered and don’t forget to include your name!

Style: Since this is not a writing course, you are free to choose your own preferred style for expository writing, but be consistent. (A standard manual for the social sciences is The Chicago Manual of Style and for the humanities is MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers.) Regardless, the review should be carefully structured and citations should be properly acknowledged. English should be literate. The more you proofread and edit, the better it will be get. Be precise, concise, clear, and persuasive!

Here is some info on writing a review:
http://www.indiana.edu/~wts/pamphlets/book_reviews.shtml
However, I expect something far more substantive than the exemplar provided.
Here are some of my own thoughts about possible content:
Present what you see as the most important conclusions of the book. Begin by stating the questions being addressed. Explain the author’s arguments and any new contributions being made. Lastly, discuss what conceptual or empirical problems the author might face.
A good review will consist of two parts. The first part of the review should summarize the main points of the work under review, and the second part should evaluate the work.
Reviews should answer the following kinds of questions:
What is the book about? What are the basic issues addressed?
What is the perspective of the author? What assumptions are being made and what exactly is being argued?
What previous interpretations and analyses of the phenomenon at hand are presented?
What evidence does the book provide to support or change some aspects of previous discussions?
What is the primary contribution of the book?
How well is it argued?
What are the strongest positive aspects of the book? What does they reveal about the nature of the phenomena under investigation?
What are the weakest aspects of the book? What, if anything, could be done to strengthen them?
What further questions does the book lead to? What is left unresolved?

GRADING:
15 points content:
your coverage of the issues in the book
your ability to connect them to other ideas and the course material
the strength of your argumentation

5 points form:
overall organization (how well you structure those ideas into a coherent whole)
clarity of presentation (how easily your critical review reads)
style (how carefully you craft that whole into a polished review)

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Article Summary: Leader Social Cognitions (Mccormick & Martinko, 2004)

2.2 Article Summary: Leader Social Cognitions (Mccormick & Martinko, 2004)

Read and summarize the Mccormick and Martinko (2004) on leader social cognitions. The summary should be written in the following format:

Begin the summary with the article reference.

Mccormick, M. J., & Martinko, M. J. (2004). Identifying leader social cognitions: Integrating the causal reasoning perspective into social cognitive theory. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(4), 2-11.

Summary

The article should be summarized (in your own words) in 2-3 paragraphs, focusing on the author’s main points. What was the purpose of the study? Describe the theoretical model or framework used in the article. (Review the book chapter and video on “The Language of Science: A Lens for Understanding the Organizational Sciences Literature” from Week 1 for help with this part of the summary.) Define terms and concepts. Describe the methodology. Was the study conducted using qualitative or qualitative methods? Who participated in the study? Were there any significant findings?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Panopticon as a parent

Personal experience as a way of investigating, or understanding Michel Foucault’s Panopticism. The essay will engage in critical questioning to move beyond personal narrative and display consciousness on the page.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

complete sentences, paragraph form

Read each question carefully, be sure to answer all parts of the question, and offer a focused, thorough, supported, and fully developed answer to each part of the question. Write in essay format: complete sentences, paragraph form, correct spelling, and grammatically correct. Any borrowed or quoted material must be appropriately documented.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Boss, I Think we Have a Problem” Central Steel Door Corporation has been in business

Boss, I Think we Have a Problem” Central Steel Door Corporation has been in business for about 20 years, successfully selling a line of steel industrial- grade doors. 137 The company had gradually increased its presence from the New York City area, first into New England and then down the Atlantic Coast, then through the Midwest and West, and finally into Canada. The com-pany’s basic expansion strategy was always the same: Choose an area, open a distribution center, hire a regional sales manager, and then let that regional sales manager help staff the distribution center and hire local sales reps. Unfortunately, the company’s traditional success in finding sales help did not extend to its overseas operations, when Mel Fisher, president of Central Steel Door, decided to expand his company into Europe. He tried for 3 weeks to find a sales manager by advertising in the Interna-tional New York Times, which is read by businesspeople in Europe and by American expatriates living and working in Europe. Although the ads placed in the Times also ran for about a month on the Times’s website, Mr. Fisher so far has received only five applications. One came from a possibly viable candidate, whereas four came from candidates who Mr. Fisher refers to as “ lost souls”— people who seem to have spent most of their time traveling aimlessly from country to country, sipping espresso in sidewalk cafés. When asked what he had done for the last 3 years, one told Mr. Fisher he’d been on a “ walkabout.”

Other aspects of his international HR activities have been equally problematic. Fisher alienated two of his U. S. sales managers by sending them to Europe to temporarily run the European operations, but neglect-ing to work out a compensation package that would cover their relatively high living expenses in Germany and Belgium. One ended up staying the better part of the year, and Mr. Fisher was rudely surprised to be informed by the Belgian government that his sales manager owed thousands of dollars in local taxes. The two managers had hired about 10 local people to staff each of the two distribution centers. However, the level of sales was disappointing, so Fisher decided to fire about half the distribution center employees. That’s when he got an emergency phone call from his temporary sales manager in Germany: “ I’ve just been told that all these employees should have had written employment agreements and that in any case we can’t fire anyone without at least 1 year’s notice, and the local authorities here are really up in arms. Boss, I think we have a problem.”

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

The self: questioning its identity and freedom/ being defined by gender

Opening statements in philosophy papers follow the general guideline of: “The aim of my paper is to show…” or “I will use the philosophy of X to analyze…”
Base on “The Edible Woman” by Margaret Atwood plus need 3 more sources.
Write about how a novel or film or any work of art elucidates philosophical theme of Identity (total 4 sources.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]