Category: Essays

Assignment Overview You are to analyze one work of art from the selected list of objects and monuments from the Museum of Modern Art in Manhattan. After close inspection of the works listed below, which must be analyzed in person, develop a response paper that uses formal analysis as a process to arrive at a fuller understanding of historical context and cultural meaning. This is not a research paper, but rather an assignment to make you think and use the basic materials of the course in an integrated fashion. We do not discourage further research – in fact it is fun – but it is not necessary and by no means will a pure research paper earn a good grade for this assignment. You are free to use whatever information the museum provides on their labels or informational signs in the area, but you MUST either quote the material with the source given in parentheses (e.g., museum label), or better, paraphrase their material but also give the museum label credit, in parentheses. However, this assignment is directed to you and your own personal observations rather than to the use of external sources.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Project Management (Discussion Questions) each discussion question response should be 1 page and have between 250 – 275 words. Provide 1 or 2 references/sources per discussion. Discussion: Project Management According to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK), a project is defined as “a temporary endeavor to create a unique product, service or result” (A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 4th Ed. 2008, p.4). Please tell us about a project that you have either managed or served as a team member. It should be something that you have accomplished at work, but you may use one from your personal life as a substitute. What was the “unique product, service, or result”? Describe overall experiences. Was the project well defined at the beginning? Did team members work together cooperatively? Be sure to make a good argument for your position. Support your response with evidence from the readings or other resources, including your personal experiences and observations. It is not necessary to provide formal citations, but you should give the sources of your information. Discussion: Project Planning Project Planning is one of the most important aspects in the success of a project. As the old adage states: “Those who fail to plan, plan to fail.” Tell us about a time when failure to plan caused a project to fail. You may choose a project from your work experience, your personal life, or a project you have read about in the news or an article. Be sure to make a good argument for your position regarding what caused the failure. Support your response with evidence from the readings or other resources. It is not necessary to provide formal citations, but you should give the sources of your information. Discussion: Project Execution Please discuss a project where you felt that the execution was completed successfully. What factors do you think contributed to this success? You may use the same project from SLP1 or use another one – that was successful! Provide the relevant details and be sure to make a good argument for your position. Support your response with evidence from the readings or other resources. It is not necessary to provide formal citations, but you should give the sources of your information. Discussion: Project Control and Closing Lack of control often leads to project failure. Please discuss the methods that your organization uses to control projects. If you are not sure, seek out a project manager at your organization and interview him/her. Be sure to make a good argument for your position. Support your response with evidence from the readings or other resources. It is not necessary to provide formal citations, but you should give the sources of your information.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Only write within a 20 year period within the years 1877-1981 5 contemporary sources- these contemporary sources must be critically evaluated on the basis of their origin, purpose, value and limitation to the enquiry that I have chosen. Combine the skills of cross referencing and evaluation of sources contemporary to the period. 3-4 secondary sources- no need to evaluate secondary sources but examine and integrate them in the process of discussing claims.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Purpose of the Assessment This assignment has been designed to allow students the opportunity to explore the underlying importance of marketing and a marketing philosophy within organisations, and to society as a whole Assessment Task “Most organisations offer more than one product or service…..The advantage here is that the various products – the product portfolio – can be managed so that they are not all in the same phase in their life cycles. Having products evenly spread across life cycles allows for the most efficient use of both cash and human resources.” Good reference: Hollensen, S. (2015) Marketing Management: A relationship approach. 3rd ed. Harlow Pearson p257. By reference to academic literature, explore the concept of the product portfolio and product lifecycle management, using appropriate industry examples to demonstrate your learning and application. Indicate how a company (Abbott Laboratories EPD) could apply the concepts, making generic recommendations. You are required to produce an essay or business report that demonstrates your understanding of key aspects of Strategic Marketing. The report should have: • A sound theoretical and conceptual perspective, containing evidence of critical debate within an appropriate academic literature. A minimum of 6 academic journal articles should be referred to. • An effective practical foundation, which makes generic management recommendations. Tips from Instructor: The work will be submitted in essay format and should be 3000 words, +/- 10%. With Harvard references. Such words scheduled as the following: 1- Introduction: 300 Words 2- Definition and Theories : 800 words (use minimum 2 references) 3- Applying the Knowledge and analysis in Abbott laboratories : 800 words(use minimum 2 references) 4- Answering the Question and Analysing the concepts used and criticizing its validity : 800 words (use minimum 2 references) 5- Conclusion and Summary of findings, listing of untapped angles, recommendations : 300 words Any assignment that exceeds the given word count will be penalised. Assessment criteria Please consult the Assessment Matters section of the Common Academic Framework – Student Guide for information on the general grading criteria. In order to gain a good pass for this assignment at this level students are expected to pay attention to the following: Structure and clarity of expression The fundamental features of well-structured work are expected as the norm at this level with students often involved in developing a suitable conceptual framework in order to evaluate and analyse the issue or question set. There will be proper attention to the type and style of the assignment – in this case academic essay – and the work should remain clearly focused, follow a logical sequence and clear sense of direction even though more complex issues are addressed. Reading/Research and Referencing Reading should extend beyond general marketing texts and encompass specialist texts as well as the extensive use of journal articles, periodicals including professional/industry publications. Students should also demonstrate a more selective approach to their reading in order to improve the quality of their work through varied, appropriate sources to logically develop and support their argument. The proper, accurate presentation of quotations and references is expected and inaccuracies will be penalised, as will the over-reliance on a single source or limited sources of information. Content and understanding Knowledge itself is not necessarily rewarded at this level. While extensive knowledge and understanding is expected, it is how this is used in analysis which is more important. Capable students will demonstrate an awareness of contemporary issues and importance of adopting an organisation wide marketing philosophy to contribute to greater stakeholder engagement, customer satisfaction and value creation. Capable students may realise that a definitive answer to particular concerns posed by the essay question may prove elusive. Analysis/Evaluation Students should demonstrate an ability to identify the key issues which are most relevant to the given area of marketing strategy, philosophy and application – centred on its overall purpose, usage and effectiveness. The ability to appraise and evaluate marketing concepts, theories and frameworks and their application for gaining understanding and insights regarding their chosen example is expected and students should be able to demonstrate skills of critical evaluation of theory during their work. Application to industry Students should demonstrate the ability to integrate theory into practice and increasing abilities to evaluate the embedded marketing philosophy and its resulting outcomes for relevant businesses and organisations. Grading / feedback guidance The table on the following pages serves as a general grading guide to assist you in preparing, structuring, presenting and evaluating your own work. Lecturer feedback will also include specific remarks on strengths and aspects for improvement as well as overall comments on the assignment as a whole. To get A Grade your scoring will be as the following: 1- Structure & clarity of expression (10%): A polished and coherent structure. Thoughts & ideas are expressed clearly and focused on the purpose of the task. Fluent academic style. 2- Reading / research & referencing (15%): Excellent range of relevant sources has been used to inform the report, with clear evidence that the credibility of sources has been considered. Referencing is in accordance with the Harvard format. 3- Content and understanding (20%): Excellent use is made of relevant marketing theory to structure and inform the marketing project. Clear understanding is evident in the way marketing theory is employed. 4- Analysis / evaluation (30%): Highly analytical approach to the marketing report. Excellent use is made of relevant theory to inform and facilitate a robust evaluation of an embedded marketing approach. 5- Application to industry (25%): The theories, findings, and analysis are fully applied to the chosen organisation, with comparisons as appropriate

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Your responses must be typed, but these are not formal research papers. They are informal assignments, asking you only to reflect and write on each of the topics. You need not revise or rewrite your initial responses. ***No sources are needed for this paper*** there wasnt an option for 0 sources when placing the order. answer the following in the paper: Fences, borders, passports, prisons, toll booths, checkpoints, visas, green cards, photo ids. Is there any legitimacy to our attempts to limit the movement of others? Don’t we have what Frederick Douglass called a natural right to locomotion, to movement, to migration?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

MAST 1120 Human Diseases: Term Paper Requirements and Grading Rubric Relating course content to the current health care environment is an integral part of your learning. One (1) term paper is required in this course. This short paper will give you the opportunity to apply your knowledge of the course content you are learning. The body of the paper should be approximately 500 words (2 pages); there should also be a title page and a reference page. Papers that are too brief or too verbose could be subject to large point deductions. The papers should be uploaded into the appropriate Dropbox. Use APA guidelines. APA requires double-spacing, Times New Roman, 12. All sources must be cited in APA format. APA resources are available via the internet. • Sources: Minimum two sources required. You may use the textbook but it does not count towards the minimum two sources, which can be books, articles, journals, newspapers, websites, etc. I strongly discourage the use of encyclopedias. Encyclopedias can prove useful as a place to start for general knowledge but you should search out information that specifically relates to your topic. • On-line sources are fine, but should be used cautiously for original web-based information. Be critical of what you find on-line–ask yourself how reliable the source is and whether it can be trusted as fact rather than fiction. Sites associated with academic institutions, government agencies, and research facilities are generally safe but be wary. Term Paper (Due Date): April 17, 2016 by 11:55 PM • Your first paragraph needs to outline the specific disease you have researched. Write unified paragraphs with topic sentences, support, and transition to the next paragraph. Do not make references to yourself in the paper. You are not the subject of your paper but its author. Avoid the assumption that the reader knows anything about your topic. This helps you keep your information clear, concise, and logical. • Content 50 points • Grammar/spelling 25 points • References/citations 25 points Based on the following criteria: Content 1. The paper fulfills the purpose of the assignment as described in this document (up to 10 points) 2. The introduction leads logically to the main idea or thesis (up to 10 points) 3. Supporting evidence is developed and analyzed sufficiently (up to 10 points) 4. Conclusion provides insightful closure (up to 10 points) 5. The content flows logically and demonstrates an understanding of the topic (up to 10 points) Grammar/Spelling 1. Sentences are grammatically correct (noun/verb agreement, punctuation, sentence structure, etc.) (up to 12.5 points) 2. Spelling is correct (e.g., homonyms used correctly, no misspellings) (up to 12.5 points) References/citations 1. Sources are cited in the body of the paper using APA format (up to 12.5 points) 2. Reference list is included with the paper that lists only sources cited in the document (up to 12.5 points) Points will be awarded for each criterion on the following scale: 5 points = few or no weaknesses found; writer satisfies the criteria with distinction 4 points = strengths outweigh the weaknesses; writer shows sound understanding of criteria 3 points = strengths and weaknesses are about equal; writer shows awareness of criteria 2 points = weaknesses outweighs strengths; writer shows limited understanding of criteria 1 point = weaknesses far outweigh strengths; writer does not show understanding of criteria Five points (5) will be deducted for each the following: No title page included Name is not on title page or in document Insufficient number of sources cited No reference page/Bibliography included Academic Dishonesty: According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, to “plagiarize” means •to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one’s own •to use (another’s production) without crediting the source •to commit literary theft •to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else’s work and lying about it afterward. Plagiarism and cheating are not tolerated and have no excuse. Inaccurate or lack of required documentation or handing in the same or similar assignments (paraphrasing another), is grounds for a zero. Have respect for your abilities, the subject matter, and your instructor by doing your own work. You will submit your paper via Turn-It-In Drop Box. This source checks for plagiarism and references.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Austerity economic policies in the Eurozone: What are the macroeconomic effects

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

When a crisis occurs, it can have an impact at every systems level. Some crises, such as a sexual assault, happen to an individual and therefore occur at the micro level. It might also have an impact at the mezzo and macro level. Other crises, such as the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, are global events that occur at the mezzo level yet impact the micro and the macro systems level. Regardless of the type or level of the crisis, social workers can use crisis theory to provide support and assistance to individuals, groups, organizations, and communities.Directions:For this Application Assignment , view the media piece, A Day in the Life of a Social Worker, and use crisis theory to analyze the crisis at various systems levels (micro, mezzo, and macro). QUESTION:Using crisis theory as a framework, analyze the crisis in the media piece(see attachment) and determine the interventions used at each systems level (micro, mezzo, and macro) to resolve the crisis. Explain at least one other intervention (not mentioned in the video) at any systems level that you might use to resolve the crisis. Justify your response based on the literature on crisis theory. Support your Application Assignment with specific references to the Learning Resources used in its preparation. You are asked to provide a reference list only for those resources not included in the Learning Resources for this course. Article: Knox, K. S., & Roberts, A. R. (2005). Crisis intervention and crisis team models in schools. Children & Schools, 27(2), 93-100. Copyright 2005 by NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS. Reprinted by permission of NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS via the Copyright Clearance Center. Article: Lewis, I., & Bolzan, N. (2007). Social work with a twist: Interweaving practice knowledge, student experience, and academic theory. Australian Social Work, 60(2), 136-1 46. Article: Morton, J. (2009). Crisis resolution: A service response to mental distress. Practice: Social work in Action, 21(3), 143-158.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Essay title: “Implementing High Commitment HRM practices within the NHS will improve the organisation’s performance through enhancing employees’ well-being”. Critically evaluate this statement. Lectures and extra reading is added. Lecture 3 has slides on Human Resource Management (HRM) and performance along with extra reading for these lectures which has content that can be included in the essay. Lecture 4 has slides on Worker satisfaction and well-being and also has extra reading content that can be included in the essay. Include a high level of critical analysis and less description. The marking scheme is provided and these are the criteria: All-levels – Outstanding answer, well written, highly structured & informed, showing striking personal insight and originality. Understanding – Comprehensive understanding of the areas of HRM and Leadership covered. Critical evaluation of the theoretical positions considered or concrete explanations reviewed. Comprehensive understanding of the conceptual and/ or empirical issues covered. Understanding developed through critical reflection on competing perspectives on HRM and Leadership discussed in the module. Highly relevant examples used to support arguments. Depth of Knowledge – Accurate and clear exposition of the theoretical positions reviewed. Extensive range of sources in healthcare used appropriately and selected specifically to address the chosen topic or to support the reflections made. Insightful, original and critical discussion of these sources and topic generally. Details presented reveal evidence of the use of, and knowledge about, several perspectives discussed in the module. Structure – Excellently structured, tightly focused, well written essay/reflective journal. Compelling arguments made.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Older Peer Mentoring Among Gifted African American Male High School Students: A Qualitative Case Study
It also must include a review of at least 30 current peer-reviewed (journal) sources. “Current” means that the study was conducted within the last 3-5 (perhaps stretching to 7) years. Anything older than that should be a recognized classic in the field or replaced with an updated source. Both your Committee Member and I mentioned this during our last review. The remainder of the issues (some of which were also mentioned in the previous review), such as the format of the References, are much quicker fixes. Please read carefully and resubmit when the issues have been addressed.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]