Criminal Justice Program Proposal: Juvenile Justice Correctional Facilities, Mortgage Investment Fraud, Rural Law Enforcement Combating Crime Custom Essay

You will be working on the Criminal Justice Program Proposal throughout this course. This is a cumulative assignment, which means that you will complete a portion of the final proposal each week. During Week Six, you will revise and consolidate your individual assignments to submit a final 5,250- to 7,000-word cumulative proposal. Select one of the following problem case studies from the University of Phoenix Material: Program Case Studies: •Juvenile Justice Correctional Facilities •Mortgage Investment Fraud •Rural Law Enforcement Combating Crime •Combating Criminal Narcotics Activity Along the Southern Border •Information Sharing Identify a problem in the case study that requires intervention. Write a 700- to 1,050-word proposal about a problem identified in the case study that requires intervention Include the following in the proposal: •Identify the type of program that would resolve the problem. •Describe the processes used to identify the problem in the case study. •Describe data collection methodologies that can be used to identify the problem. •Identify the data that must be collected to identify the problem. •Identify ways to involve key personnel in collecting and analyzing data. Include related terminology and concepts identified through the assigned readings. Format your proposal consistent with APA guidelines The topic I chose was Juvenile Justice Correctional Facilities.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Article Analysis: Why Should We Give a Bleep about Profanity Custom Essay

For this assignment, write an analysis of one of the following articles: “Why Should We Give a Bleep about Profanity?” by Neil Macdonald: http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/profanity-neil-macdonald-1.3406290 Your essay should be double spaced, in 12-point font and 2.5 – 3 pages (or 625 – 750 words). Consider what the author is arguing and how s/he is making her/his claim. In performing your analysis, note what strikes you as interesting, strange, significant or revealing (see Writing Analytically Chapter 3). Also look for patterns in the text: repetitions, binaries, anomalies (see Writing Analytically Chapter 1). Use your observation to make a claim and formulate a thesis statement about the text’s meaning. Be sure to ask yourself “so what?” about the observations you have highlighted. What does the text mean and how does the author support her/his claim(s)? Warning: Avoid summarizing the plot, simply offering a list of observation or ideas from the text. You need to make claims and arguments about how the text produces meaning. Link the details/evidence you notice in the text to claims you are making about what the text is arguing and how it is arguing. Keep in mind: Do not argue with the author or focus your paper on the topic in the article. The article itself is the subject of your analysis. This assignment is NOT a research assignment. There is no need to use secondary sources. You will be graded on the development and the plausibility of your analysis and interpretation of the text, the structure of your argument and your writing (spelling, grammar and style). course book:Writing Analytically, 2nd Cdn. ed., eds. D. Rosenwasser, J. Stephen, & D. Babington

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Cuases of Inner City Gun Violence Custom Essay

Prompt: I want you to identify a problem that we are facing as a country, or even worldwide. Choose something that really concerns you. For example, the number of people living in poverty has increased significantly in recent years, and many people are concerned about that. Others are alarmed by the widening gap between the wealthiest Americans and the poorest Americans. This problem is called income disparity or income inequality. Bullying in our public schools has received a lot of attention locally and nationally. A lot has been said about the problem of addiction (alcohol, drugs, gambling, food, etc) in the past few decades, and it seems like more and more Americans suffer from addiction. There are plenty of problems facing our country and world today, and your job for this assignment is to select one problem, and then write a research-based essay focusing on the primary causes of the problem you have selected. Focus on the top two or three most-significant causes of the problem. After you have conducted your research, write a rough draft of your essay. Use at least three sources of researched information in your essay. Review the information about the essay components in chapters 2-4 of the textbook as you write and revise your essay. Make sure that you cite your sources in the body of your paper (parenthetical documentation) and at the end of your paper (Works Cited page) according to Modern Language Association (MLA) guidleines. MLA documentation (parenthetical documentation and Works Cited) Use this as 1 of the 3 sources https://www.dropbox.com/s/9wm5ar8hshrqhru/Research%20Gun%20violence%20cuase.docx?dl=0 use the war on drugs issue as stated in the paper and would like to see poverty used as a source and id suggest is the ease of getting an illegal firearm easily but the last one is up to you. This paper should be written in plain English with attention to reduce wordiness use at least 3 different sources to support the arguments of 3 main causes other than that use sources as needed. don’t be strongly anti gun thought. In the lead in lead with a story about a horrendous case of gun violence like worst day for death in an inner city then present some statics on inner city gun violence. only 10% of this paper should be paraphrasing/quoting/summarizing. I Want To See a Rough Draft In 24-48 Hours.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Policy Implementation at National, State, and Local Levels: Homeland Security Custom Essay

Use the paper draft that you did for me a few weeks ago to now complete an Table of contents and an Outline Format. Use the completed DRAFT paper that you did for me previously to complete the Table of contents and an Outline Format. Only fill in the Black part (not grey) of the annotated outline format and the black part of the table of contents. This assignment is part 2 of the Final Research paper which will be next. I will attach the completed paper draft as well as the blank Table of contents and an Outline Format for you to complete

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Organizational Theory: How does Morgan’s (1980) view of organizations compare to Astley Custom Essay

How does Morgan’s (1980) view of organizations compare to Astley, W.G. & Van de Ven, A.H. (1983)? What are their similarities? What are their differences? Which view, in your opinion, is best suited to explaining public organizations and why? What, specifically, are Simon’s (1946) concerns about principles of management and how should they be resolved or can they? Discuss and explain. Which specific authors was he referring to in his essay and why? How does Weber (1926) describe the bureaucracy? What are its merits? How can it be efficient and effective? What does the bureaucracy look like? Explain and describe his view and how the bureaucracy is supposed to work, in his opinion. What is scientific management? What are its goals and purposes? Which author(s) discussed scientific management, and in what context. Use dates, descriptions, and methodologies to describe how the author(s) developed what is now known as scientific management. Pfeffer (1993), Van Maanen (1995), and Van de Ven (1999) had a three way discussion of the state of organizational theory. What are each of their main points? What do they agree on? What do they disagree on? How have their views impacted your view of the organizational theory readings we have read – good/bad/indifferent? Give examples of readings and how the arguments of Pfeffer, Van Maanen and Van de Ven shaped your opinion of them, citing both the arguments and the readings. Using Cyert & March (1959) as your guide, what type(s) of coalition(s) do you think will build in response to Flint, MI’s water crisis? What types of side payments will they demand? What types of policy commitments will they demand? What objectives will the coalitions create? How would these coalitions change from pre-April 2014 water changeover to today? What impacted those changes? How will the changes impact future organizations? Public policy? Social justice issues? Why does the giving of orders matter, according to Follett (1926)? What can organizations do to ensure effective and efficient operations in relation to the giving of orders? Explain the difference between personalized and repersonalized orders and working with versus working under someone. Give an example of orders given in your own workplace, and how those orders could be improved by use of Follett (1926)? In the Hawthorne Experiments, what revolutionary concept had the researchers actually found? Why did this matter then? Why does it matter now? What are some present-day examples of this? Is this relatable to Smith’s and Taylor’s research and how? Describe Maslow’s (1943) hierarchy of needs. What does he mean by each level? Consider the concept of cultural specificity and discuss how each level could be changed based on cultural specificity. What does this study have to do with organizations? Discuss and describe Theory X and Theory Y. Compare both with the study of scientific management. Cite authors, findings, and dates to bolster your argument on whether Theory X or Theory Y is more aligned with the concept of scientific management, or whether neither of them aligns with scientific management. What is groupthink and how does it impact policy and political decisions? What are the positives of groupthink? What are the negatives? What should we, as public administrators, do when confronted with groupthink? Blimes and Gould (2009) tackle the age old question: do companies perform better as a result of their investment in human capital, or does a successful company invest more in its workforce? What do the authors say? Why does this question matter? How does it impact human resource studies? How does it impact benefit packages offered in the private sector? The public sector? The NFP sector? What other authors have covered this in our readings? Who are they and how does their work relate to Blimes & Gould? What is the difference between a purely political city government and a bureaucratically structured government according to Tolbert & Zucker (1983)? Why is the change from a political institution to a bureaucratic institution an important change for local governments? How would Kanter (1979) identify sources of power in both the bureaucratically structured and purely political city government? How would the positions of powerlessness change with the change in structure? According to Agranoff, R. & McGuire, M. (2001), what are the “seven basic operating questions related to network management?” Why do they matter? How are these related to an earlier reading and why? What impact did the earlier reading have on their formation? How do Blau & Scott (1962) define a “bureaucratic organization”? What is an “administrative apparatus”? Why is this important? What purpose does it serve? What do Blau & Scott say about all organizations? How does this work relate to LaPalombara’s work and why? What are some of the observed characteristics of Plant F and Plant P, according to Walker and Lorsch (1968)? Why do they matter? How do they impact the work getting done? How do Walker and Lorsch’s (1968) Plant F and Plant P relate to French & Raven’s (1959) discussion of Person P and Person O? What are some of the similarities? What are some of the differences? What are the five basic parts of organizations, according to Mintzberg (1979)? What do you think about this structure? Agree? Disagree? Why? Who are the members of the “Strategic Apex”? Who are members of the “Operating Core”? Who are the members of the “The Middle Line”? Who are members of the “Technostructure”? Who are the members of the “Support Staff”? Why do these players matter, according to Mintzberg? What is “technology as a contingency factor”? What are technology’s effects on: Formalization Centralization Organizational Complexity Configuration Compare and contrast Mintzberg’s 1979 & 1983 articles. How are the diagrams he uses related? How are they different? How does the expansion of the diagram in 1983 address critical issues related to public organizations? Pick a section of the Classics of Organization Theory we have covered in one week’s time. Choose two of the authors in the section and compare their articles, discussing similarities and differences. Tell me how the authors have impacted organizational theory as you see it, and how their work has impacted organizations that you have been a part of in the past or are a part of presently. TEXTBOOKS/READINGS: 1. Shafritz, Jay M; J. Steven ott; Young Suk Jang, eds., 2011. Classics of Organization Theory, seventh edition. Wadsworth Cengage Learning. 2. Bilmes, Linda J.; W. Scott Gould, 2009. People Factor, Strengthening America by Investing in Public Service. Brookings Institute Press. 3. Christensen, Tom; Per Laegreid, Paul G. Roness, and Kjell Arne Rovik, 2007. Organization Theory and the Public Sector. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. (https://www.europe-solidarity.eu/documents/ES_ORGANIZAT_THEORY_2007.pdf)

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Reflective Essay: Reflect on the evaluation plan; your KASABs as an Evaluator Custom Essay

Reflect on the evaluation plan; your KASABs as an evaluator; and the impact of your evaluation plan on the system in which you work. Note: The Reflective Essay will not be turned in with the Professional Development Evaluation Plan (narrative form). You will submit a separate document for your Reflective essay along with your Evaluation Plan At-a-Glance as an appendix. You made it! You have worked hard in this course to create an evaluation plan and make important decisions about how to communicate information to various stakeholders. Take a moment to reflect on your learning and your current strengths and areas of need as a professional development evaluator. Then, respond to the following prompts: Consider yourself as an evaluator: What changes in your own KASABs have occurred based on your experiences in this course? In what areas do you still hope to build your expertise as an evaluator of professional development? What actions will you take to make gains in these areas? If you had to identify one area in which you have the strongest understanding of the professional development evaluation process, what phase would it be and why? What more do you want and need to learn as an evaluator? Consider the professional development program you worked on in this course: Based on what you learned in creating an evaluation plan, what modifications will you make to your Logic Model before implementing your program? Which changes in KASABs for stakeholders seem particularly important for the success of your program? Consider the system within which you work: How might your professional development evaluation work help to build a culture of accountability in your school or district?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

How does social learning theory differ from psychoanalytic theory Custom Essay

1. How does social learning theory differ from psychoanalytic theory? Consider the implications of each theoretical model for responding to delinquent youth. 2. How is cultural transmission theory related to the concentric zone hypothesis? Chapter 4 3. What are the four delinquency intervention program? What is their relative successfulness in reducing delinquency? 4. What are your views on the death penalty? What are your views on the death penalty for juvenile offenders? Should age of the offender mitigate the use of the death penalty?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Working with Involuntary: What Works in Corrections Research Paper

Active Learning 2 My assignment is to read the below: • Working with Involuntary, Chapters 2 & 3. • What Works in Corrections, Chapters 2 & 3. Text Book: MacKenzie, D.L. (2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 978-0-521-00120-5 Trotter, C. (2015). Working with involuntary clients: A guide to practice (3rd ed.) Los Angeles, CA: Corwin Press. 978-0-414-7-2 (paperback) or 978-1-315-88058-7 (e-book). Answer the following: • No less than 500 words . 1 Answer the following: 1. What is Evidence-Based Practice in Corrections? 2. In addition, describe some approaches that work in dealing with the involuntary client. Your remarks can be opinion and based on your experience and/or prior learning, but must be supported with research

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Science in the Mass Media Custom Essay

In this assignment you will look at how a scientific controversy was portrayed in the mass media, what impressions a general reader would have gained (about the controversy and about science in general) and how the controversy played out over time. In order to do this, you will take advantage of the back issues of newspapers and magazines which are available (and fully searchable) on the Web. Look at the way the story was presented over time. What sources were quoted? What message was given to the public? How did the message change over time (if at all)? Were there any key moments in which coverage of the story changed significantly (tipping points)? What conclusions can you draw not only from how the science was presented, but from the public reaction? Paper Structure: Start out with a brief (one paragraph) summary of the conflict. You should do some basic research to familiarize yourself with the con troversy before you start. Go back and look at the scientific paper(s) that prompted the stories and explain what they actually said. Your next paragraph should briefly explain your methodology. Explain exactly what sources you used, what search terms you employed, and the time frame you looked at. Once you have that out of the way, present your results. Generally speaking, a chronological approach will be best. Start out with the earliest references to the conflict you can find, move through the heart of the conflict and finally to its resolution, continually referencing the stories you found. Try to be aware of any changes in the way the story is being treated, whether in the tone of the stories or in the nature of the experts being quoted. Finally, a closing paragraph should bring together all your conclusions and summarize your findings about the way in which the story was covered, what message was given to the public, and what (if any) impact there might have been on the broader view of science. The final paper should be 1000 – 1250 words (4-5 pages, double-spaced) (not counting references) Hints: Rather than simply analyzing what the Globe and Mail had to say, you might find it instructive to compare several newspapers from different countries, or two different newspapers from the same country, to see how/if the story was being covered differently. If you do see any differences, can you explain why? (Remember: science doesn’t take place in a vacuum, so the social considerations always affect how science is done and understood.) You might also compare how a mass- market source like a newspaper or magazine covered the story compared with the approach of a more specialist source of information like a science magazine or journal. Look for how the story was covered by the stakeholders (those actually affected by the controversy) as well as by the larger media. If you are dealing with a longer-term controversy (the controversy over CFCs, for example) look at how the story was treated over a longer period of time, looking for any significant changes in tone or approach. And always keep an eye out for anyone who might have ulterior motives. The Controversies (choose one): The Dover Intelligent Design Trial of 2005 The Ozone Hole Debate (and the broader debate over banning CFCs) The Acid Rain Debate The first test-tube baby Scientists try to build artificial organs using stem cells and 3D printers (February 2013) Cold Fusion The Vaccination-Autism Debate The Demotion of Pluto Scientists create a hybrid, air-transmitted bird flu (May, 2013)

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

That could be used by a virtual team in a company (Ford Motor Company) to communicate with their worldwide divisions Custom Essay

(e.g. Facebook, Twitter, Ideascale, Redbox, etc.) that could be used by a virtual team in a company (Ford Motor Company) to communicate with their worldwide divisions. This would be a tool they could use in all parts of their operations. Your group must use your readings to research and create a “grading platform” to create criteria to “grade” each platform (this is a team rubric you are creating together). For example, you could create a matrix that has ease of communication as one measuring item (your team will need to think of additional measuring items). Individual Work After your group has “graded” these platforms, each person in your group will then write their own 5 to 7 page paper to recommend whether or not Ford should use these platforms by using your grading matrix and your readings to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each platform. In the end, your paper should recommend one platform that would best meet Ford’s needs based on your analysis. Your paper should include an ADDITIONAL one page “Executive Letter” addressed to the CEO of Ford Motor Company that summarizes your findings. Remember to use your readings and outside sources (at least 4-5 additional sources) as per the grading matrix. You will be observed for your level of engagement with your peers on this project (part 1). I would recommend you working with your peers in the first part of the week to complete your grading platform. That will give you and your team time to complete writing their paper. Please submit your paper to Turnitin prior to final submission. You will submit your graded platform, executive letter and 5-7 page paper individually for this assignment. However, your team should be working together for the first part of the activity. Your instructor will create a Discussion Board Area (or your team can utilize another tool) to work together. Please write your paper in 3rd person format. The executive letter should be professionally written. HERE ISTHE GRADING MATRIX WITH THE PLATFORMS Facebook Cost – 1 Ease of use – 1 Number of functions – 2 Availability of tech support – 3 Ease of geographical Communication – 1 Privacy setup – 3 Kaltura Cost – 2 Ease of use – 1 Number of functions – 3 Availability of tech support – 2 Ease of geographical communication – 1 Privacy function – 2 TIBBR Grade Notes Allows users to connect with each other via social networking platform on computer or via app that leverages various other systems, such as email, SharePoint, DropBox, etc. Cost 2 $12/user per month – decreases with more people Ease of use 1 Looks and is used like facebook Number of functions 1 Chat, newsfeed with @ function, groups, selective sharing, video streaming, mobile app & connections to file sharing apps, online meeting apps, numerous other apps, including personal social networking sites. Availability of tech support 3 Clear “contact us” bar, but minimal info in their support portal, no online chat tech support, and no phone number in sight. Only availability is via email YAMMER Allows users to connect with each other via social networking platform on computer or via app Cost 1 Basic free option, $3/user per month – additional security, data analytics, support, etc. $2.50 – $20/user per month for other options, including Cloud suite and resources for schools. Ease of use 1 Looks and is used like Facebook. Minimal features, so the interface is very simple and easy to navigate Number of functions 3 Chat, newsfeed, groups, mobile app, linked to a few Microsoft apps Availability of tech support 1 Giant icons to click for various issues and app support, support site has extensive info presented in reader-friendly way, chat, phone, email, and user forum support all available and easy to locate.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]