An A3 poster presentation of a case study which highlights the Sex Role Theory by Sutherland and Parsons

An A3 poster presentation of a case study which highlights the Sex Role Theory by Sutherland and Parsons. The layout must be logical. All references must be available correctly Harvard referenced on a separate word document. Use graphs or charts if necessary but make sure they’re referenced. The A3 poster must be done on Powerpoint. Make sure the theory links to case study. Find any GOOD case study.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Choose a behavioral management theory (such as Mary Parker Follett or Hawthorne Studies or Theory X and Theory Y) AND a contemporary viewpoint (such as The Open-Systems View or Contingency Theory)

Assignment question Choose a behavioral management theory (such as Mary Parker Follett or Hawthorne Studies or Theory X and Theory Y) AND a contemporary viewpoint (such as The Open-Systems View or Contingency Theory) in Chapter 2 of the prescribed textbook (see Table 2.3 on page 53) and critically discuss their contributions and limitations in managing employees today.
When writing this essay, you are required to: • use knowledge of Topic 2 of your prescribed textbook • use clear essay structure as outlined below • cite a minimum of 6 journal articles. In addition, you can cite other academic references (such as textbooks, research books and chapters in research books). Some of these can be found in the recommended list below. You may choose other management journal articles or academic references beyond this list. Please see marking rubric for marks awarded for use of number of appropriate resources.
Unit learning outcomes assessed at the completion of this assignment: (ULO1, ULO2 and ULO4. See the Unit Guide) • ULO 1: demonstrate a critical understanding of the historical evolution of management. • ULO 2: critically analyse a range of issues facing managers in contemporary organisations • ULO 4: produce clear written arguments around specific management issues.

Assignment Guidance
1. Essay structure Your essay should have the following sections:
Introduction: should state the aims/purposes of the essay and the outline key sections in the essay (and if you can, tell the reader what line of argument you will present in your essay, but this is not compulsory).
Body of the essay (please don’t use this as a heading): answer the essay question.
Conclusion: summarises your line of argument or your key discussion points presented in the body of the essay to answer the essay question. No new information presented here.
References: list all the references you cited in the essay, using the Harvard referencing style
Note: you don’t have to use headings in this essay but it may be a good idea to have about three to four headings (no more than four headings) as signposts for the readers. (Each section can include several paragraphs.)
Your essay should provide evidence of substantial reading of relevant academic journal articles, academic books or book chapters that supports its main points, not present your own opinions.
2. Formatting requirements for the assignment Your assignment should be presented in a reader-friendly way: • be a MSWord document (a .doc, or .docx format or pdf; NO other format is accepted) • no long paragraphs (approx. 250 words maximum), or no very short paragraphs (one or two short sentences unless it is a connecting sentence between two sections) • 1.5 spaced, 2.5 cm margins • 12pt font size, Times New Roman • have page numbers consecutively in the footer
• include your name and ID in the header • use headings to help make the structure of your assignment clearer.
3

3. Sources and citation requirements a) Within the body of your essay, every source you have drawn upon must be accurately cited using in-text citations (NOT footnotes) following the Deakin Harvard referencing style: www.deakin.edu.au/referencing. • Remember that for all direct quotes you must provide page numbers in addition to the author and year. • See more information on the Harvard referencing style in the ASSIGNMENT RESOURCES subfolder 6.1 Referencing and plagiarism on the unit site in CloudDeakin. b) Full details of all sources referred to in-text must be included in your Reference List, and must be correctly formatted using the Deakin Harvard referencing style. c) You can use other academic references such as book, book chapters or peer reviewed journal articles which are available from Deakin University Library online databases (e.g., Business Source Premier, ABI Inform, Emerald Management Plus, or Science Direct) d) Note that Wikipedia, answers.com, general websites and other personal opinion or social networking websites are NOT accepted. Assignments that cite these websites will be penalised. e) Note that lecture slides are NOT counted as an academic reference so if you want to use the information on slides, you need to track down the original source and reference it properly as all the ideas on the slides come from the readings or citations outlined in the slides.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

International Marketing Management

dear,consider National Bank of Abu Dhabi as the chosen organization,

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Endocrinology and Reproductive Physiology

Endocrinology and Reproductive Physiology

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Equity and Trust

“Secret trusts are scrutinised in every trust law text-book. Numerous scholarly articles have debated their theoretical basis. Yet they remain a conceptual conundrum. Is a fully secret trust testamentary or inter-vivos? Is it express or constructive? Should its apparent failure to comply with the requirements of the Wills Act be disregarded to prevent fraud or because it is dehors (outside the scope of) the will?”
Stewart Manley, ‘Reconceptualising the fully-secret trust’ (2015) 21 Trusts and Trustees 802
Critically discuss.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

movie analysis

The assigned readings are available through ted.ucsd.edu-vis 84-readings. Please follow the instructions strictly in the exam description, and be sure to cite from the readings assigned. Do not copy anything from the Internet or reading without citing them.
For the short essay, utilize readings from the material from week 10.
Note there are two parts on the exam so two essays(one long and one short) need to be completed.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

This exam consists of two parts– a short answer and a long essay question (see prompts and further instructions below).
Please upload both responses as a single Word document or PDF via TurnItIn/Ted.

Citations and Formatting

You must submit original work and identify your sources. Improper or unattributed sources for content or language will not be tolerated. Your source material should be coming directly from the assigned readings, and not from online or print bibliographic sources unless I have provided them. If you are unsure at any moment about whether a source is permissible, please feel free to consult with me via email. When in doubt, please also consult the UCSD Academic Integrity Policy: https://students.ucsd.edu/academics/academic-integrity/index.html

All responses must be set in 12-point font and should strictly follow the required lengths. If possible, please use a font with serifs (like the one on this page), as they are easier to read. Outline format will not be accepted as a response.

Absolutely proofread and edit your submissions. These texts must be submitted as polished as possible; exams will be graded down for grammatical errors and misspellings. Please use your word processing program’s spellcheck functions.

PLEASE ANSWER BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS

(1)

SHORT ANSWER QUESTION:

Please discuss three films shown in lecture or section (Weeks 1-9, not Week 10) that changed your view of cinema or the history of cinema, and explain why it changed your view, and exactly how the filmmaker accomplished this (subject matter, formal innovations, rejection of cinematic conventions, narrative approaches). Be as specific as possible with your answers (if formal innovations or narrative approaches, for example, which ones?), and refer to relevant readings. Homework films cannot be addressed in this question.

SHORT ANSWER Instructions:

Length: 600-700 words, simple citations. For the Short Answer portion of the exam, it will be sufficient for you to identify direct quotations and indirect statements from the readings assigned to the course by identifying the page number, and naming the author and the title of their text within the sentence.

Short Answer responses will be graded primarily with regard to breadth of knowledge; ability to concisely synthesize content from disparate moments in film history; and engagement with the reading and the content discussed in lecture. Your answer should contain at least 3-4 different references to the assigned course readings. Whenever possible, you must identify and refer to specific filmmakers and films addressed in lecture or section.

(2)

LONG ESSAY QUESTION:

In 1989, Ayatollah Khomeini of Iran decreed a fatwa of death against Mumbai-born, British author Salman Rushdie for The Satanic Verses (1988), a novel of “magical realism,” which controversially drew from aspects of the Muslim faith. Upon interviewing Rushdie in 1995—while the author was still under police protection due to ongoing assassination attempts—Canadian filmmaker David Cronenberg thought about the possibility of another kind of decree against a designer of virtual-reality games. His resulting 1999 film, eXistenZ, explores the multi-dimensionality of virtual worlds and considers the political, sexual, and spiritual implications of this radical, and potentially questionable, reimagining of reality. Cronenberg, who is fascinated by the relationship between technology and the body, offers a number of hypotheses in eXistenZ of how the human/computer interface might take shape in the near future, and a few of these ideas are amazingly prescient for the late-1990s, from the naming, style, and use of various devices in the film. Please develop an essay, which considers Cronenberg’s address of virtual reality in as many inventive ways as you can, and discuss it in relation to the apparatus theory of cinema (cinematographic apparatus) and the phantasmagoria, defining these concepts and assessing their compatibility to the idea of virtual reality and gaming. Additionally, please address in what way eXistenZ differs from Andrei Tarkovsky’s 1972 film Solaris in its handling of the relationship between reality and illusion. Potential themes you may also want to address (to a lesser extent) in eXistenZ are constructions of race and gender; sexuality; automatism; (inter)subjectivity; spectatorship; media; and time. Please note, in order to fully meet the evaluation criteria for the exam, you must include at least three close readings of shots and/or sequences of the film (devoting at least 2 paragraphs each) that demonstrate your understanding of the relevant film terms and substantiate your interpretive points. This may require taking notes and re-watching the film (or sections of it) several times.

LONG ESSAY Instructions:

Length: minimum 6-7 pages long, double-spaced, full bibliographic citations. Apply a standard system of citation, either MLA or Chicago to the Long Essay portion of the exam. If you have trouble adopting either of these systems, please feel free to consult with me. To learn more about the UCSD Academic Integrity Policy, please visit: https://students.ucsd.edu/academics/academic-integrity/index.html

This essay should clearly demonstrate a sustained engagement with eXistenZ, which will begin streaming on Geisel Media Reserves (UCSD IP addresses or via UCSD VPN) on Thursday, Dec 3rd and is also already available on Netflix. Your essay should have a central thesis supported by a discussion of the film’s specific formal elements, as well as 3-4 different references to the assigned course readings on the syllabus with full bibliographic citations. You will be evaluated on the originality of your ideas; the clarity of verbal expression; the development of a coherent central argument; as well as your engagement with the assigned readings from the entire quarter. The essay should be informed by the film’s formal details and development of narrative. Be sure to focalize at least three times (across a couple paragraphs each) to particular elements or sequences of the film, in which you closely describe and analyze the filmmaker’s use of cinematic conventions (framing, recording speeds, sound, editing, etc.) and consider what their significance might be. In reference to other films shown in class, please draw comparisons that will convince your reader of the larger argument you wish to make about the film.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

The following background articles on David Cronenberg maybe of interest to you after having watched the film; however, your essay will be evaluated on your ability to tie your analysis of the film to at least 3-4 course readings from the syllabus, not from this list:

Richard von Busack, “Pod Man Out,” Metro (April 22-28, 1999): [online resource]
https://www.metroactive.com/papers/metro/04.22.99/existenz-9916.html

Steve Burgess, “David Cronenberg,” Salon.com (Nov 30, 1999): [online resource]
https://www.salon.com/1999/11/30/cronenberg_2/

Cronenberg’s interview with Rushdie
David Cronenberg, “The Enemy of the People and the Media” [Interview with Salman Rushdie], Shift 3.4 (June-July 1995): [online resource]
https://www.davidcronenberg.de/cr_rushd.htm

Joshua Rothkopf, “Ready Player One: Why “eXistenZ” Is a Gamer-Movie Masterpiece,” RollingStone.com (May 28, 2015): [online resource]
https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/features/ready-player-one-why-existenz-is-a-game-culture-masterpiece-20150528

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Laboratory Exercises

Jackson, S. L. (2014). Research methods: A modular approach (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning. ISBN-13: 9781285750491

Details:

Complete the even-numbered problems for the designated chapter(s) in the textbook. Students are highly encouraged to complete all problems in each chapter, as odd-numbered problems increase understanding of even-numbered problems (answers to odd numbered problems are located in appendix A at the back of the text.

Chapter 1, module 1, exercises 2 and 4
Chapter 1, module 2, exercises 2 and 4

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

biocon

1. Would you start a pharmaceutical firm in India during the time frame the case is discussing? Why? Why not? What analysis led you to your conclusion?
2. Is the Indian CRO market attractive? Using Porters ‘Five Forces’ framework explain your answer.
3. Does Biocon have a competitive advantage in the Indian market? Can it have one on a global scale? Can it climb the industry value curve consistently? Would you change its strategic approach? If so how?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Comparing and contrasting the careers of Andrew Carnegie and Sam Walton. Among the topics: social background of each man, key moments in his business career, management style,

Write a five page paper comparing and contrasting the careers of Andrew Carnegie and Sam Walton. Among the topics: social background of each man, key moments in his business career, management style, role in “creative destruction” of older business methods, companies, and technologies, attitude toward labor, social and political ideology, philanthropic program, impact of the company he built on society and economy. You do not have to choose all of these topics. Just focus on one or a few or construct your own categories of analysis suitable for comparing the careers of these men and the institution they created.

When ever possible avoid merely quoting the historian authors of each book to make a point. Instead offer examples, stories, anecdotes, or other information found in each book that advances your argument. Be concrete and not vacuous; offer facts and events rather than abstract generalizations. Feel free, of course, to quote Carnegie, Walton, or their associates to drive home a point.

The first paragraph in your essay should explain the argument or thesis you will develop in the rest of the paper. This paragraph should always be thoroughly revised once you have finished writing your five pages. And make sure your paragraphs are not too long: one idea or even per paragraph is the best policy.

Footnote or endnote your paper, and not just in terms of actual quotations, but when referencing an idea, event, or story.

Please use the following Texts Book as sources:
Jefferson Cowie, Capital Moves: RCA’s 70-Year Quest for Cheap Labor
Colin Gordon, New Deals: Business, Labor, and Politics in America, 1920-1935
Nelson Lichtenstein, The Retail Revolution: How Wal-Mart Created a Brave New World
Harold Livesay, Andrew Carnegie and the Rise of Big Business
Articles listed in the syllabus can be found on JSTOR via Library, Article Indexes & Research

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Business Law Discussion

John is the sole proprietor of a business that designs web pages. He leases an office and buys computer equipment. He has an idea or a new software product, however, on which he works whenever he has time and which he hopes will be more profitable than designing Web pages. After six months, Mary and Paul come to work in the business to help develop John’s idea. John continues to pay the rent and other expenses, including salaries for Mary and Paul. John does not expect to make a profit at least until the software is developed, which could be months, and there may be very little profit if the product is not marketed successfully. John believes that if the product is successful, however, the company will be able to follow up with other products. John would like to retain overall control of the business, but needs to find a way to tie the salaries of Mary and Paul to the success of the business; and needs to raise capital to implement his business plan. He also wants to limit his personal liability if the business fails.

Post ONE important consideration in choosing a form of business organization for this firm that will best allow it to meet John’s objectives. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this option? Suggest a written document that John should developed to reduce future liability and problems of the new business. Provide sound reasoning for your stance and back it up with references, if possible. Your logic should be factual, not emotional. Then, reply to two or more of your classmates’ postings (three additional postings are needed for an “Exemplary” grade). See the Discussion Rubric for additional information and grading criteria.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]