Category: Essays

This project contains two parts. The first part is the 1500-word research written assignment, which is a description of the Healthy People program, and your chosen focus area/topic area:
• Pick one of 28 focus areas from the Healthy People 2010 report, which will also be a focus area on the Healthy People 2020 report.
• Research and describe your chosen focus area. Then, describe your chosen focus area on a national level, as well as on a community level – Houston, Texas.
• What improvements need to be made to ensure that our community – Houston, Texas – will display signs of progression to a healthier community that will reflect in the Healthy People 2020 report? Research and explain.
The research PowerPoint presentation is the second part of the project:
• The PP presentation should be 2 to 3 minutes in length; must include visual and audio.
• Post on Discussion Board for online class to review and respond.

12 font, 1-inch margins, Times New Roman

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-LDoRf2x1xSUkJfUGZIZVVfZDA/view?pli=1

1) Read the “sourcing potato’s for elevation burger Kuwait”
2) Prepare two page report “Use easy vocabulary “
3) Make sure to itemize your response to identify the question you are answering (no need to rewrite the question only add the letter of the questin)
4) List of the question
A. What are the challenges facing TABCo in sourcing potatoes?
B. Is there an ethical dilemma facing Ali Ashkanani in sourcing potatoes for elevation burger? If so, then explain. What do you recommend ali to do?
C. How do you view the approach ali Ashkanani took in solving the potato-sourcing problem? What would you do differently?
D. What do you recommend TABCo to do moving forward? Support your response with figures from the case. You may need to take into account TABCo’s cost of capital and growth rate. Clearly state and justify your assumptions. Use Microsoft excels to conduct a net-a-present-value for the different alternatives.

Please be sure that all the paper is taking to the main company no need for any concept .

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Professional Development Plan – Running Head

1- Introduction to the topic: this is a brief paragraph that provides an overview of the assignment; and A purpose statement: The purpose of the paper is to
2) Education and Professional Background (20 points)
– Brief personal introduction; My personal introduction
– , I am 35 year old , married , mother of 3 kids , working as an RN in critical care unit , I have 15 years of experience in nursing , Graduated in 2000 , completed BSN in 2012 , You can add your ideas and make it good , Live in Dallas , Allen , Working at Texas health resources ,
3) Description of the formal and informal learning experiences that comprise educational background, including individual knowledge, skills, and accomplishments; can adds up points and makes it good ,
have BLS ,ACLS , CCRN AND FCCS , CERTIFICATION , I AM THE RESOURCE PERSONEL IN ICU FOR ,CRRT, AND I AM A IV RESOURCE PERSON , ALSO I am in the team which helps to prevent CLBSI AND CAUTI , I am a super user for Care connect which is the computer charting system in the hospital .

4 ) Professional Goals (15 points)
I am planning to do Master’s Degree in Family nurse practioner ,My Ultimate goal to complete DNP you can add any other 3 goals
-Statement of purpose for completing a graduate program;
5 )Three to four professional goals; and
-Identification of how earning a master’s degree will assist in meeting goals and –carrying out the mission of the University (Walden University)
6) Course Outcomes
-Address, in detail, three to four specific learning goals you accomplished.
7) Address, in detail, one area needing improvement and actions you will take to grow in that area
8) Practicum (15 points)
ii. Identify one possible practicum settings (Presbyterian hospital, my preceptor is Dr .Husain). that match personal, professional, and course learning goals; and
9) Identify one project to potentially develop in your practicum setting or area of interest that addresses a real-world problem.
10) Summary (10 points)

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Readings
Arcangelo, V. P., & Peterson, A. M. (Eds.). (2013). Pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice: A practical approach (3rd ed.). Ambler, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Chapter 19, “Hypertension” (pp. 230–246)

This chapter examines the relationships between the cardiovascular, nervous, and renal systems. It then describes diagnostic criteria for hypertension patients, drugs used to treat hypertension and possible adverse reactions, monitoring patient response, and patient education.
Chapter 20, “Hyperlipidemia” (pp. 247–262)

This chapter explores causes of hyperlipidemia, treatments for hyperlipidemia patients, and methods for monitoring patient response. It also reviews strategies for risk assessment and patient education.
Chapter 21, “Chronic Stable Angina” (pp. 263–277)

This chapter begins by exploring factors that contribute to chronic stable angina, types of drugs used in treatment, and diagnostic criteria for initiating drug therapy. It also examines methods for monitoring patient response to treatment and educating patients on self-care.
Chapter 22, “Heart Failure” (pp. 278–297)

This chapter examines the process of prescribing drugs to treat heart failure and explores effects of prescribed drugs, proper dosages, and possible adverse reactions.
Chapter 49, “Anticoagulation Disturbances” (pp. 764–803)

This chapter covers drug therapy options for three disorders requiring anticoagulants: venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation, and ischemic stroke. It also explains the process of initiating and managing drug therapy for patients with these disorders.
Drugs.com. (2012). Retrieved from https://www.drugs.com/
================================================================================================================
Consider the following case studies:
Case Study 1:
Patient AO has a history of obesity and has recently gained 9 pounds. The patient has been diagnosed with hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Drugs currently prescribed include the following:
Atenolol 12.5 mg daily
Doxazosin 8 mg daily
Hydralazine 10 mg qid
Sertraline 25 mg daily
Simvastatin 80 mg daily
Case Study 2:
Patient HM has a history of atrial fibrillation and a transient ischemic attack (TIA). The patient has been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and ischemic heart disease. Drugs currently prescribed include the following:
Warfarin 5 mg daily MWF and 2.5 mg daily T, TH, Sat, Sun
Aspirin 81 mg daily
Metformin 1000 mg po bid
Glyburide 10 mg bid
Atenolol 100 mg po daily
Motrin 200 mg 1–3 tablets every 6 hours as needed for pain
Case Study 3:
Patient CB has a history of strokes. The patient has been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Drugs currently prescribed include the following:
Glipizide 10 mg po daily
HCTZ 25 mg daily
Atenolol 25 mg po daily
Hydralazine 25 mg qid
Simvastatin 80 mg daily
Verapamil 180 mg CD daily
================================================================================================================
To prepare:
1))Review Chapters 19 and 20 of the Arcangelo and Peterson text.
2))Select one of the three case studies, as well as one the following factors: genetics, gender, ethnicity, age, or behavior factors.
3))Reflect on how the factor you selected might influence the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.
4))Consider how changes in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy.
5))Think about how you might improve the patient’s drug therapy plan based on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes. Reflect on whether you would modify the current drug treatment or provide an alternative treatment option for the patient.
================================================================================================================
Post an explanation of how the factor you selected might influence the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in the patient from the case study you selected. Then, describe how changes in the processes might impact the patient’s recommended drug therapy. Finally, explain how you might improve the patient’s drug therapy plan.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

You have been asked by the MD to provide a report on how the company can ensure it is operating ethically. You will need to evaluate the company’s systems and processes and look at how an ethical culture can be established.
1. Evaluate the conceptual underpinning of ethical leadership and how the concepts can be used in decision making [25%]
2. Critically consider approaches to developing the systems and culture of ethical business [25%]
3. Propose, develop and provide an appropriate justification for an intervention which will make a difference to an organisation’s ethical behaviours specifically considering the leadership role utilising appropriate referencing conventions [50%]

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

TASK 1

Reflective blog / Learning journal – section
Generate 100 ideas for a business
Record your 100 ideas and initial thoughts about the process
Evaluating your 100 ideas; Consider the relevance of Kanter critical reflection to your process.
Develope one business idea
-Draft your Business Model Canvas (BMC) hypotheses for a business Idea; Consider the relevance of Sarasvathy critical reflection to your process
Test your hypothesis / pivot ; Consider if the prototype has helped you to change your idea
Evidence of ‘talking-to-people’ and incremental reflection on what this input has meant in terms of testing your hypotheses.
Walk in the customers shoes
Observe customers
Talk to people
Run a survey
Design a ‘near-real’ experiment
– Talk to 10 customer; Record details of your customer interactions; consider the ‘Think / Act / Do cycle’
Design for viability
– Develop an operational plan; Talk to 10 customers; Record details of your customer interactions; are your hypotheses changing? How does this relate to Sarasvathy?
Design for viability
– Develop a team plan and job descriptions; Talk to 5 suppliers; Record details of your customer interactions; what academic theory is most relevant to you at this stage?
– Develop a cash-flow statement from start-up to breakeven / viability; Reflect on the iterative process of development
Design for growth
-Work through the RBV framework; Consider if you are now an effectuator or causator
Thinking about the future
– competitive strategy; Explore the process of planning versus experimentation
Design for growth
– Work through alternative future scenarios (5 year worst-case and best case); Consider the resource implications of success / failure
Work on your BMC for viability and BMC for growth; Record your process and analyse accordingly
Continue to test your hypotheses / refine; Record your process and analyse accordingly

Marking criteria. (2000 words or more)
Critical use of appropriate entrepreneurial theory (40%)
-You need to use your reflective evidence from within each of the identified sections (identified below) to critique identified theory from within the field of entrepreneurship. Harvard referencing must be used

Journal and reflection on ideation (15%)
-This period maps the creative time where you develop the initial idea. Evidence should be given of the evaluation of the 100 business ideas

Journal and reflection on business design for viability (15%)
-This period maps the initial design phase where you developed the business model and functional areas through an iterative process of design, customer interaction and experimentation

Journal and reflection on business design for growth (15%)
-This period maps the final design phase where you developed the business model and functional areas through a process of forecasting and strategic planning

Consideration for development / action plan (15%)
– Following your weekly reflection and critical review you should present an action plan based on your analysis of how you will do things differently in future for each phase e.g. ideation, business design for viability, business design for growth.

TASK 2

Develop a business plan
Business plan section
The business model / plan should not exceed 2000 words, excluding appendices.
Marking criteria

Success / Business model (10%)
– Overview of your business model; This could include a vision, and should articulate your story of business.

Viability summary (5%)
-The plan explains how the business model will reach viability, being the point at which the business reaches breakeven and is economically sustainable.

Components of Business Model Canvas (10%)
-The plan uses the components of the BMC to describe the business model required to reach this level of viability.

Hypotheses (15%)
-The hypothetical linkages between the components of your business model are identified with an explanation of how robust / believable they are e.g. number of customers / suppliers / consulted; observations made; surveys completed.

Growth summary (5%)
-The plan communicates how the business will grow from initial viability to a more ambitious implementation over an extended timeframe (for example 5 or 10 years).

Components of Business Model Canvas (10%)
-The plan uses the components of the BMC that need to change in order for the business model to grow over the identified extended timeframe.

Hypotheses (15%)
-The hypothetical linkages between the components of your business model are identified with an explanation of how robust / believable they are i.e supported through scenario planning, sensitivity analysis, Cost, data-forecasts (Budget, break even analysis)

Evidence base (20%)
-The business model has been developed with evidence of: robust primary research, customer interaction and consultation with experts; diligent use of relevant analytical tools such as scenario planning, etc. Evidence of these must be provided within the appendix

Communication of plan (10%)
-The plan is clearly and consistently communicated, with appropriate grammar and relevant referencing where necessary. Visual techniques are used as appropriate to simplify and reinforce delivery.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Select three pieces of varied evidence relating to your chosen issue. Explain what they are, giving the rationale for your selection, and commenting on their strengths and limitations. (60% of the marks)
Reflect on the process of data search, selection and appraisal, indicating your search methods and what you see as key issues or dilemmas that emerged in this process. (40% of the marks)
Answer both parts of the question.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Pick one Mondrian’s painting or artwork and analysis his art and him with art theory.
‘Theory, Logical collection, Idea beauty
You have to use these books for sources/references.
‘Theories of Modern Art: A Source Book by Artists and Critics by Herschel B. Chipp’ and ‘Art in theory 1900 to 2000 an anthology of changing ideas’
Also you can use sources/references from ‘Plastic art and pure plastic art 1937 and other essays, 1941-1943 by Mondrian, Piet’ and Paul Klee, “Creative Credo” (1920), some internet, other books…

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

You are required to submit two summaries representing two different ‘themes’ from delivered sessions. You will be required to provide a summary of the actual session and to demonstrate further learning / investigation into the subject area ie including further reading and critical thinking.
Each summary should be no more than a 500 words and must include a reference list (not included in the 500 word limit).
Marking Criteria

For part (A):
• Accuracy
• Clarity
• Critical thinking
• Effective use of books, journals and articles
• A reference list using the Harvard system.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

An evaluation of MRI as compared to ultrasound in detecting knee meniscus tear for football players

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]