Using the information found in the attached website articles discuss at least two potential issues associated with online collaboration and what solutions could be used in order to resolve those issues.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Let’s make a Marketing plan on Mobile device gaming design. Please take a look of my works I did during the course and
will add-on from my work. I will up lode those files.
Semester project: Create a fictitious company. For the company, create a comprehensive marketing plan that highlights a
customer-centric approach to marketing.
At least 10 sources that explain decisions that have been made by similar organizations/companies to that one your are
proposing.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Part I: The Organizational Structure on American Diabetes Association (last week attached )
Complete an environmental scan for the health care organization you chose in Week Two. Use the SWOT Analysis table.
Address the following items:
•Assess the organization’s internal strengths and weaknesses.
•Analyze the industry for opportunities and threats.
•Perform a SWOT analysis. A SWOT analysis helps determine performance gaps. It includes the following components:
?Strengths
?Weaknesses
?Opportunities
?Threats
•Describe the organization’s present and prospective customers.
•Evaluate the impact of the following factors:
?Consumer and social
?Competitive
?Technological
?Economic
?Legal and regulatory
Submit the SWOT analysis as a Microsoft® Excel® attachment.
PLEASE READ ALL THE ATTACHMENTS AND FOLLOW THESE STEPS
•Evaluate the significance and implications of an external environmental analysis in the development of a strategic plan.
For your evaluation:
?Explain the purpose of environmental analysis.
?Describe possible implications of environmental analysis in the creation of your strategic plan.
?Analyze evolving external issues that can have an impact on the strategic plan.
?Evaluate benefits of competitive analysis as part of the strategic planning process.
•Based on your SWOT analysis, provide an assessment of your chosen organization in which you:
?Evaluate the organization’s ability to accomplish its mission, goals, and objectives as set in previous strategic plans.
?Evaluate the organization’s ability to respond to internal and external changes and challenges.
•Incorporate your SWOT analysis findings into clearly stated goals and objectives for a 3- to 5-year period, focusing on
your strategic plan areas.
?You will have two to three goals for each year, with two to three measurable objectives for each goal.
?Goals may span several years.
?Outline your goals and objectives clearly and provide a narrative explanation for each of them.
Cite at least 5 peer-reviewed, scholarly, or similar resources to support your information.
U can use the resources in part one but add at least 3 new ones
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]How it started and how far cloning in general has came. Not just human cloning but cloning in general, body parts. etc.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Objectives (Includes Goals and Research Questions or Hypotheses)
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]The United States is the leading consumer of illegal drugs like marijuana and cocaine. Some foreign policy experts argue that the U.S. consumer demand for illegal drugs is a primary cause of the drug violence and gang warfare in Mexico and Central America. Is the U.S. consumption of illegal drugs a major factor in the drug violence in Mexico and Central America? Why is America so attractive to foreign drug traffickers?
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]To allow students to explore an additional topic or two of interest to them, we will ask you to listen to one or more of the smorgasbord talks. Each lecture has a lecture time associated with it. You will be asked to listen to the lectures of YOUR choice within that menu and accumulate at least 120 minutes of lecture. [Please show the “math”, i.e., give the official time for each presentation viewed.]
We will then have you write a brief review of what you have watched: For each 20 minutes, write a point along the lines of what were the most IMPORTANT points of the talk? What question does the talk raise? What would improve the presentation? Are there other topics that this talk suggested that you might like to hear? A total of at least 6 points should be covered for the exercise. (A talk of 75 minutes can have 3 or 4 points – they do NOT need to be from the 1st 10 minutes, the 2nd 10 minutes etc. – just 3 or 4 appropriate points.) If the other talk is 55 minutes, you need 2 or 3 points to make your 6! PLEASE CLEARLY NUMBER YOUR SIX (6) POINTS. The actual discussion board postings can be very similar to those you use for the on-line lectures and in-class lecture discussion postings.
Note: The Passover lectures for Cornell students are included in the regular course requirements and, therefore, cannot be used for the Smorgasbord requirement.
You should go to blackboard for cornell university this is the link:
https://blackboard.cornell.edu/webapps/login/
enter the cornell net ID : sa746
password : QAsh1357
Then go to the course FDSC 2500
Then on the left side click on Smorgasbord.
Then choose any lecture with its power point presentation and write an essay following all the instructions above about that lecture and presentation.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Tony’s Chips has recently been sold to a new independent company. The new company has hired you to manage a project that will move the old Website from an externally hosted solution to an internal one. The company’s leadership is very concerned about redundancy for their site, insisting that a back-up site be available as a failover in case the main site goes down. In addition, they want the site redesigned to allow customers to order products online.
As part of your job, you must complete a 10-to-15 page paper that follows this project through the system development life cycle (SDLC). This assignment will require you to do the following:
Discuss what it will take to build a Web architecture, move an existing Website with minimal downtime, and provide a disaster recovery solution to ensure the site is always available.
The Web architecture should describe and justify operating system choices (i.e., Linux, Apache, MYSQL, PHP, Windows, IIS, SQL, etc.).
Evaluate alternatives to the company self-hosting the site.
Build a Gantt chart using Microsoft Project or equivalent software, showing all tasks associated with implementing the Website.
The chart should include a minimum of five (5) tasks, each with three (3) sub-tasks.
Explain and justify the system architecture you have selected.
Illustrate the system architecture using Visio or equivalent software.
Create a use case that documents the event of a customer ordering a bag of chips from the new Website.
The use case should include a graphical representation using Visio or equivalent software and a text description of the
events.
Discuss the support operations that the internally hosted Website will require after implementation.
Explain how you will evaluate the performance of the new site and the success of your project.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]1. Using MS Word, type a one-page response to the scenario with the following content with 11 font size:
A. Across the top, title your paper “CHEN 4520 Ethics HW”. Below the title give your name and the date.
B. Describe in a brief paragraph the decision you would make, i.e. the course of action you would take given the scenario.
B. In a second brief paragraph, offer a rationale for your decision, i.e. a reasoned explanation for your decision.
C. Lastly, comment on whether the AIChE Code of Ethics or the two ethical theories, or both, offered any guidance for your decision, and if so how.
The line spacing, font size, and margins should be similar to this document.
((Heart transplant scenario))
This scenario is taken from McGraw-Hill General and Human Biology Bioethics Case Studies. While this specific scenario is not necessarily one that practicing engineers would encounter, the larger ethical issues are pertinent.
The hospital ethics committee was discussing an important and urgent case. A donor heart had become available, but an extremely rare thing had happened. Two heart-transplant candidates in the hospital were both matches for the donor heart. One patient was known to the committee as Mr. X, the other as Ms. Y.
For someone with heart failure, Mr. X had been on the transplant waiting list a long time. He had been waiting one year and was near death. Ms. Y had just been placed on the list and could be sustained with medication for quite some time, possibly until another heart became available. The answer seemed obvious-give the heart to Mr. X.
A number of the members of the committee did not agree with this answer. They argued that time on the transplant list should be only one factor considered. They saw a problem in Mr. X’s medical record.
Mr. X was 64 years old and had suffered from a heart condition for years. He had had two angioplasties and two bypass operations to correct a blockage of the heart’s blood vessels. The problem seen by some committee members was that Mr. X still smoked, ate fatty foods, and was very overweight. After each procedure, doctors had warned Mr. X that he must change his life-style, and that if he didn’t, his condition would worsen. He never stopped smoking, however, and never changed his diet. He said it was too hard.
Research has proven that smoking and high cholesterol are risk factors for heart problems. Blockage of the coronary arteries is directly attributed to these two factors. Treatments such as angioplasty (opening the blood vessels by passing a tube into the arteries) and bypass surgery (connecting new blood vessels that go around the clogged ones) can correct the problem, but they are not a total cure. To avoid further problems, patients must control their diet, stop smoking, and alleviate stress. This, of course, is not easy. Mr. X appeared not even to try.
The heart was about to be airlifted to the hospital. The committee had to make their decision very soon.
What should the committee do?
(AlchE Code of Ethics)
Taken from HYPERLINK “https://www.aiche.com” www.aiche.com, the AIChE Code of Ethics:
Members of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers shall uphold and advance the integrity, honor and dignity of the engineering profession by:
Being honest and impartial and serving with fidelity their employers, their clients, and the public;
Striving to increase the competence and prestige of the engineering profession;
Using their knowledge and skill for the enhancement of human welfare.
To Achieve these Goals, Members shall:
Hold paramount the safety, health and welfare of the public and protect the environment in performance of their professional duties.
Formally advise their employers or clients (and consider further disclosure, if warranted) if they perceive that a consequence of their duties will adversely affect the present or future health or safety of their colleagues or the public.
Accept responsibility for their actions, seek and heed critical review of their work and offer objective criticism of the work of others.
Issue statements or present information only in an objective and truthful manner.
Act in professional matters for each employer or client as faithful agents or trustees, avoiding conflicts of interest and never breaching confidentiality.
Treat fairly and respectfully all colleagues and co-workers, recognizing their unique contributions and capabilities.
Perform professional services only in areas of their competence.
Build their professional reputations on the merits of their services.
Continue their professional development throughout their careers, and provide opportunities for the professional development of those under their supervision.
Never tolerate harassment.
Conduct themselves in a fair, honorable and respectful manner.
(Basics of utilitarian and deontological ethics)
Below are capsule descriptions of two major ethical theories taken from Encyclopedia Britannica:
UTILITARIANISM: a philosophy in which an action is right if it tends to promote happiness and wrong if it tends to produce the reverse of happiness—not just the happiness of the performer of the action but also that of everyone affected by it. Such a theory is in opposition to egoism, the view that a person should pursue his own self-interest, even at the expense of others, and to any ethical theory that regards some acts or types of acts as right or wrong independently of their consequences (see deontological ethics). Utilitarianism also differs from ethical theories that make the rightness or wrongness of an act dependent upon the motive of the agent, for, according to the utilitarian, it is possible for the right thing to be done from a bad motive. (In short, a follower of utilitarianism acts in a way that he/she believes will lead to the greatest overall good.)
DEONTOLOGY (DUTY ETHICS): places special emphasis on the relationship between duty and the morality of human actions. In deontological ethics an action is considered morally good because of some characteristic of the action itself, not because the product of the action is good. Deontological ethics holds that at least some acts are morally obligatory regardless of their consequences for human welfare. Descriptive of such ethics are such expressions as “Duty for duty’s sake,” “Virtue is its own reward,” and “Let justice be done though the heavens fall.” (In short, a follower of deontology will act in a way that follows their understanding of an absolute code of morally right behavior, even if harm comes to themselves or others. Deontologists have moral absolutes.)
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]“Advertising works most effectively when its in line with what people are already trying to do. And people are trying to
communicate in a certain way on Facebook – they share information with their friends, they learn about what their friends
are doing – so theres really a whole new opportunity for a new type of advertising model within that” Mark Zuckerberg.
Using relevant models and theory you are required to critically analyse the approaches taken by organisations in the B2C
sector in building and maintaining relationships with consumers in the digital environment, and the consumers role in this
process.
Answers should include the topic of engagement and should consider theory relating to consumer behaviour, promotion policy
and media and the consumers role in these areas, reaching logical conclusions. You should focus on academically credible
sources of information, rather than hearsay and hype.
1. Document should not exceed 10 typed pages (3,000 words) of text excluding title page, contents page and executive
summary.
2. Must be supported by 5 pages of supporting appendices which should include an annotated bibliography and content list.
3. Should be presented in an appropriate format.
4. Should be fully referenced using the Harvard system of citation.
5. Report must also include an annotated bibliography which identifies your top 10 sources of information , with the
reasons why and Harvard referencing should be used throughout. The criteria you should use to evaluate your sources should
be credibility, reliability and merits of the preferred sources.
Must use UK English format.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]