This is a Literature Review; However this is not a dissertation literature review. YOU MUST FIND A GAP. Please follow instructions to the tee. Do not use too many big vocabulary. I’m a good writer, but I’m not the best, but I do want something that will reflect well that I did my research, and found my gap. Please read the instructions below. CI Instructions and grading criteria The structure of your article should conform to the following generic academic article guidelines: The title you choose must illustrate the content of the article. A structured abstract (see Appendix 2) will help to set the context of your academic article. This should provide a background and rationale for the article with a clear main aim and objectives (i.e. where the article is going and why it is important). The introduction and rationale of your article should provide a brief background that will provide the reader with the context of your study, introduce the thematic area and explain why this topic is important to the hospitality/events/tourism industry. You can refer to key researchers and their work; and identify the ‘gap’ that your work is aiming to fill. The introduction should also explain the structure of your The critical literature review and analysis is the central section of your academic article. Here you should critically review published work in the area using extensive and multiple referencing to explore your topic in depth. The aim is to draw themes and concepts together in a coherent way, which addresses your research issue and argument. In doing this you must consider opposing views and relate to current thinking and practice in the industry. You are explaining to the reader the different conceptual perspectives of your topic by analysing different authors’ arguments. An academic article focuses on a small number of themes linked to your topic, and explores each of the In the discussion, you provide examples of hospitality/events/tourism industry practice which illustrate key constructs in your thematic area. The sources for these examples need to be properly cited – and can be researched using printed or online academic articles, company sources, industry/organisational media, and Internet sources. You need to try and synthesise theory and practice to provide a potential answer to the ‘gap’ you identified in the introduction. The conclusion should explain how the article has achieved its main aim and include a clear statement of the article’s implications for hospitality, event and tourism managers. This section should also include possible areas for further research and an acknowledgement of the limitations of This section should demonstrate extensive and relevant reading from a wide range of academic, trade, professional and electronic sources. Each source that you have used and made reference to in your article must be listed in accordance with the Business School’s Harvard reference system. Any information you have used from the Internet must also be correctly listed. The word count for the assignment is 2,500 words, not including the front page, structure abstract 1.) Is the article sufficiently novel and interesting to warrant publication? 2.) Title, Abstract & Introduction: Does the title clearly describe the article? Is the abstract structured? Does it reflect the content of the article? Does the introduction & rationale describe what the author hoped to achieve accurately, and clearly state the problem being 3.) Literature Review: Does the article sufficiently build on the academic literature in the topic area? Is any significant work ignored? Is the evidence cited reliable and accurate? 4.) Discussion and Synthesis from the Industry perspective: Has the author effectively used the factual and academic evidence to support their opinions in a logical, objective argument? Does the author evaluate theories within the context of evidence in their chosen industry 5.) Conclusion: Does the conclusion explain how the research has moved the body of knowledge forward? Does the article identify clearly any implications for practice and/or future research? Does the author consider possible limitations in the study? 6.) Quality of Communication: Is the article of the correct length (2,500 words, not including the front page, structured abstract and list of references) and does it conform to the presentation standards? Is the article well written (free of major spelling and grammatical errors; and uses appropriate vocabulary)? 7.) Referencing: Are all sources (printed and electronic) used in the article listed in accordance with the Business School’s Harvard System conventions? Does the list of references demonstrate breadth and depth in academic and practitioner research?
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]