Please make an outline for pre research paper which is an out line discussing the internet regulation . This paper is about brain storming ideas and make sure you contain 3 contralling ideas ,also use the square format to organize the essay . Make sure your ideas match the reaserch paper as the out line .
Note as well no quoting. I am posting the reaserch paper . Please read it carfully . Best regards..
?The debate regarding whether the government should regulate the accessibility of information over the internet to its citizen has been raging in the recent past. On one hand, a section of individuals and organizations hold the opinion that the government should regulate the internet due to the increasing risk of online breaches. On the other hand, the other set of individuals and organizations feel that the government regulation of the internet will impede their rights to privacy and access to information. However, both factions believe that the government has a responsibility of protecting its citizens from harmful activities. The main point of departure from the two parties is the extent to which the government should go in regulating the access of information. This paper discusses whether there is need for the government to regulation the information accessed by the citizens through the internet.
Government Regulation of Internet Information Access
?The objective of creating internet was to enable efficient sharing information from one computer network to the other. Therefore, any form of regulating access to the information is a deviation from this objective. The internet is a product of the United States army aimed at ensuring that information was not lost in case of an attack (Lips and Koops 120). The computers were interconnected in a way that enabled efficient flow of information. The same concept was evident in the 1990s when the internet was made available to the public (Lips and Koops 121). As a result, internet has enabled people from contrasting backgrounds to connect and share information. This has facilitated positive exchange of cultures and information. As a result, the world more connected than ever before. Regulating the sharing of information between the various individuals and organizations across the internet can sever these relationships and make it difficult to achieve significant interactions both socially and economically.
Regulation of information accessibility violates the right to privacy. To identify the type of information that different individuals will have access to or to be restricted from, the government would have to go through each bit of information conveyed through the internet which includes personal information (Mullen 584). In addition, the government would also have to monitor private information and conversations of its citizens in the various platforms of the internet. This might also pave way to other activities such as gathering and storing of private information that can be used to develop identity profiles. In case such information falls in the wrongs hands or is diverted to malicious individuals or organization the consequences can be very catastrophic (Mullen 586). Individuals handling the information might also be tempted to use information for other motives such as blackmail, extortion and monetary gain, activities that is totally unethical and criminal.
Most recently, allegations have surfaced in the recent past when the National Security Agency was believed to be conducting data surveillance and gathering of American citizen (Alexander 73). Carrying out such actions, compromises the citizens’ right to privacy, which the government should be protecting. It illustrates the government’s failure in its duty ensure that the citizens’ right to privacy which is enshrined in the constitution. Instead, the government should strive in identifying ways and mechanisms, which can help in ensuring that the online privacy of the citizen is safeguarded as world continues to interconnect rapidly. As a result, the internet users would feel safer while browsing the internet as opposed to fear of someone monitoring their activity.
Certain malicious or criminal individuals and organizations continue to use the internet to carry actions of espionage, cyber-terrorism and other activities that threaten the security of the country. The government has identified attacks that target key government utilities and institutions (Ahamad et al. 5). Most these attacks has led to denial of vital services and weakening of the public infrastructure. Malicious individuals and criminal gangs perpetrate some of the attacks while young individual in their pursuit of adventure carries others (Alexander 75). However, attacks carried out by external parties are mainly malicious or targeted at collecting critical information. Therefore, some of this factors warrant the government to control access to information to impede any potential attacks.
In the name of free speech, the social media has been used to carry out political activism, which has led to overthrow of the government such as the overthrow of the Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak from power (Frisch 181). Although the public has a democratic right to decide their leaders, appropriate channels that exist in the constitution must be followed. For that reason, the government should enact legislations to describe what constitutes free speech and what constitutes incitement or treason. However, the existing government should not exploit this alternative to gain advantage over the opposition or to scuttle its political rivals.
The government has an obligation to protect its citizenry. In the recent past, the internet has been synonymous with several breaches of personal information propagated by a surge in cybercriminals. Minors who access the internet are exposed to such criminals and huge volumes of content that inappropriate for their age (Economides and Tåg 92). In addition, incidences of cyberbullying have on the increase, which have threatened the security of the citizens as well as the national security. Therefore, in the best interest of its citizen’s security, the government has to respond. These include arresting and prosecuting these criminals to ensure that they do not continue to carry out further criminal activities. To achieve this, the government has to enact policies and regulations top govern the use of the internet. In addition, the government may be required to access personal or monitor the internet activities of the suspects to gather sufficient evident for the prosecution.
Conclusion
?The internet has resulted to major progress in the society, which was previously unimaginable. During that time, the internet experienced minimal or no regulation by the government, information shared freely and easily. The government’s move to regulate the flow of information would undermine the remarkable achieved so far. In the process, the privacy of internet users might be breached or exposed to greater risk such as certain individuals or organizations who may use the information to carry out ulterior motives. The government is usually faced with a tricky alternative of protective its citizen from harmful online activities and simultaneously upholding the civil liberties guaranteed by the federal constitution. While it is necessary to ensure that the public is safe and not affected by fraudulent or deviant activities, the government should not impede on the citizens right to information access and privacy. Therefore, the government should only intervene only in instances where the public faces imminent danger.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]