Category: Essays

You are the solicitor for the Goldstone City Council (a fictional local authority in Queensland). You head the property law division of Council, under the direction of the Head Legal Counsel. Your Head Legal Counsel has asked you to provide a written response to her in respect of the following matter: In 2014, a wealthy local citizen, Mr. Robert Kennedy, died. Clause 5 of his Will provides:- “I GIVE AND BEQUEATH the sum of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($500,000.00) to my trustee, the said James Stewart, to establish a fund for the intercultural education of my grandchildren within the Asia-Pacific region AND I DECLARE that the fund so created shall be utilised towards the costs of travel and accommodation within that region and the costs of the educational process, which process shall include the learning of languages of the said region AND I FURTHER DECLARE that the suitability of such expenditure shall be determined by my said Trustee.” Clause 6 of the Will is a residuary clause which provides that if the bequest in Clause 5 should fail, then it shall be paid to the Goldstone City Council. Robert had one son, Dean who was 60 years old when Robert died and still survives. Dean has no children. You have been asked to advise your Head Legal Counsel how the Council might obtain the funds in clause 5 of the Will, now or in the future. In responding, you must clearly refer to, and apply, statutory provisions supporting your opinion. In writing your answer, you can assume that your Head Counsel is well aware of the laws involving the various Local Government Acts including Town Planning, the Trusts Act and the Succession Act. Your opinion has been sought as an expert in property law only and you should advise only on that basis. Therefore, do not advise on any matter outside this ambit unless absolutely essential to your property law advice. Your Property Law subject Course Content, selected readings, cases, textbooks, and journal articles will guide your answer.

 

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

The essay has 2 parts. and both parts based on Tina Rosenberg’s "Children of Cain. "
Maybe need to mention Chasteen’s "Born in blood and fire" too.
Here is the instructions

Part One
Write a 4-5 page, typed, and double-spaced essay that responds to the following prompt.

Those who have studied Modern Latin America encounter a turbulent and often violent history, especially during the period after World War Two. Once familiar with the narrative, we are compelled to consider the causes and significance of what we encounter. Tina Rosenberg’s Children of Cain, for example, presents case studies of six Latin American countries that experienced extraordinary challenges to the foundations of modern society, be it through the perceptions of the elite classes, the soul crushing poverty of the marginalized, the fear of subversion, the desire for radical change, the weakness of governing institutions, or the influence of external actors. In these instances we gain insights into the precariousness of modernity, especially the importance of constitutional order and the rule of law, but also the everyday practices of civil society that holds the social fabric together in a way that assures we do not descend into the Hobbesian world where life becomes “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”

In writing this essay, you are invited to consider the problem of the causes of the violence, but also the significance of the violence for understanding Modern Latin American history. Your essay is required to explore two of the following parings of countries in Rosenberg’s analysis: Columbia and Peru or Argentina and Salvador. As you engage these parings, you want to discern from them what each tells us about the problem of cause and significance, which should assist you with forming analysis as against a descriptive narration of what happened in each country. As you organize your thoughts, keep in mind that most likely a strong essay will avoid treating the countries in separate sections of the essays. Instead, you will probably have stronger analysis by organizing the essay by themes, using the country parings in an integrated fashion to illustrate how the topic examined contributes to your overall argument. Also keep in mind that it is important to frame your essay’s line of inquiry in the introduction by putting forward a central question, problematic, or puzzle. In considering this line of inquiry you want to focus on the relationship between cause and significance, so that the particular analysis and argument about cause is reaching to a larger line of inquiry about Modern Latin America. This larger line of inquiry can be derived from a combination of themes we have explored during our class sessions, lines of inquiry presented in Rosenberg’s analysis, as well as ideas and arguments put forward in Chasteen’s Born in Fire and Blood.

Grading criteria
· Clarity of writing, including grammar, organization, and presentation of evidence.

· Use of evidence from Rosenberg in constructing your analysis.

· Demonstrated understanding of the country case studies.

· Balance between country case studies selected.

· Clarity and substance of the line of inquiry established.

· Strength of themes selected for analysis.

· Strength of argument advanced.
Part Two
Select one of the following prompts and write a 4-5 page essay, using both Rosenberg and Chasteen in developing your response. As with the prompt in Part One, you may find best analysis resulting from integrating the case studies as against presenting them as separate paragraphs or sections of your essay.

[1] Considering evidence in the four country case studies we read in Rosenberg’s Children of Cain, write and essay that considers the importance of the United States in shaping the history portrayed. Your essay should make an argument as to the extent we might view the actions of the United States as the primary cause for the violence that transpired in Argentina, Peru, Colombia, and El Salvador.

[2] Argentina, Peru, Colombia, and El Salvador share the common ground of being capitalist societies. For some analysts, the correlation is causation, while for others the fact that they are capitalist has little to do with the violence portrayed in Rosenberg’s Children of Cain. Write an essay that takes a position on the correlation as causation debate for understanding the history portrayed in the four country case studies we read.

Grading criteria
· Strength of line of inquiry presented in the introduction.

· Strength of topics and themes selected.

· Strength of argument advanced.

· Use of evidence from Rosenberg and Chasteen.

· Demonstrated understanding of the topic (role of US or significance of capitalism).

· Demonstrated understanding of the country case studies.

· Clarity of writing, including grammar and organization.

· Balance between country case studies utilized.

 

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

write a journal article (for mock publication) about The use of ‘Reflective Practice’ as a tool for new graduate nurses, and the relevance to Registered Nurses, particularly those beginning their practice. The essay is expected to have a theme (i.e. a ‘point’, a statement or an argument) and then be supported from appropriate and current literature.

The purpose of the essay is to give it a context it is to be considered as an article for a mock Australian journal which is to be published for New Graduates (Beginning Practitioners, new Registered Nurses).

Aims/Pitch/Audience:
1. Essay conventions are expected (introduction/conclusion). An Abstract, if included is NOT part of the work count. It may be a good mechanism though to report to the Community of Practice (optional).
2. The aim is to write current and pertinent information targeted for novice Registered Nurses in the Australian Environment.
3. Although writing ‘to’ this audience – the essay should be in third person and not second (i.e. ‘the nurse’ rather than ‘you’)
4. A high level of scholarship (researching the literature, using the literature and writing the paper) is expected. To these ends, 12 pertinent and current resources is the minimum. Current means in this course 8 years ‘young’ unless a seminal (classic) work. Sometimes secondary citations in a current article will be older (please check in a timely manner with the examiner if in doubt).
5. The essay is to be published as assignment – there are NO marks for spending time ‘publishing’ and formatting it for a journal (with attractive columns, pictures, fonts etc.) This is not a good use of student time as it is the content, writing and referencing skills which are being assessed.

Also could you please use the files I attached to as a reference for the Journal article.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

• The essay is an individual work, and each is required to choose a luxury brand regardless of its size, as long as the information is widely available about it.
• The essay should not be more than 3000 words
• This assignment will be submitted through Turnitin, and will be subjects to assessment for any Plagarism, please familiarise yourself with these procedures.
• Essay Structure
? Title page (not included in the word count): state name, course, unit, essay title, number of words, date submitted, unit leader.
? Abstract (not included in the word count). It should briefly outline the scope of the investigation, the method(s) you used in your analysis, your findings, any important issues raised in the discussion, the conclusion and recommendations.
? Table of contents (not included in the word count). Include also a List of Figures, and list of tables show the figure (table) number, caption and the page number, ordered as they appear in the text.
? Introduction: This includes a brief overview of the brand: its products, and its current position in the luxury industry reflecting the various aspects of its performance in the last 5 years. Included also a short background about the brand. Note: It is NOT required to talk about the history of the company).
? Body
? Appendices (not included in the word count). You need to include the following:
o A list of the financial statements of the company which are usually found in the Annual report of the organization and that can be downloaded from its website.
o Any calculations such as Financial Ratios
o Any figures, graphs, or data about the brand
? References: You should also include a list of References that are used to collect information, all the referencing should be done according to the Harvard referencing system.

 

 
Assignment details:
You work as a consultants a global consultancy company based in the City of London and you were asked to research a luxury company and assess its approach to generate profits (since the 2008 financial crisis until now). The essay should cover the following areas:
1- Assess the previous and current strategies followed by the brand to generate profits, and what luxury management approaches / strategies the brand has been following. The assessment should be backed up with evidence from the company financial figures, performance, and secondary research data including industry reports, academic journals, and other reliable data sources.
2- It is vital that you critically refer to the academic literature for any theories or models on managing luxury brand profitability, and other aspects related to luxury brand management.
3- You need also to strength and weaknesses of such strategies (e.g managing its brand in the downturn)
4- The overall conclusion of the paper is an evaluation of the organization’s approach towards managing its brand.
5- You need to summarize the major issues that emerged from your analysis of the brand and present a short list of recommendations that could strengthen the company’s ability to improve its profitability and consequently manage its brand efficiently

Assessment Objectives/Rationale:
– To critically appraise the concept of luxury and critically analyse the unique characteristics of the global luxury goods market with emphasis on the financial performance of luxury organisations

– To assess different managerial approaches, expansion plans and growth strategies suitable for mature and/or emerging luxury goods markets, by engaging with academic literature.

– To critically evaluate the key success factors in building luxury market offerings, from conception to development, communication, distribution and retail and recommend an appropriate course of action in response to a given brief

– To select and utilise a range of theories to effectively communicate findings, present solutions

 

Assessment Criteria:
All 4 learning outcomes will be assessed through the work specified above. Marks will be awarded according to the following criteria:

• Knowledge and understanding of theories, frameworks, approaches and processes relevant to the management of luxury goods, services and organisations and depth of critical analysis of the financial performance of a luxury business
• Ability to critically relate a variety of approaches, expansion plans and growth strategies suitable for luxury goods markets
• Depth of critical analysis and evaluation of different strategies and tactics formulated and implemented by luxury companies and ability to recommend an appropriate course of action in response to a given brief
• Appropriateness and feasibility of the proposed solutions and recommendations, and relevance of selection of theories applied

 

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Task: This editorial has just appeared in the Mergbonia Courier:
EDITORIAL – CANCER SERVICE NOT VERY CARING
"For the third month in a row this newspaper has received many letters of complaint from our readers
concerning their bad experiences with the cancer service at Mergbonia Hospital. Our readers have
complained of dirty bedrooms and bathrooms, long waiting times for radiotherapy treatment and
disinterested staff in the chemotherapy unit. We’ve heard stories of surgical treatment being
cancelled, even after people have travelled by car for 500 kilometres. There have also been three
horrific stories of elderly patients sustaining broken arms after falling whilst attempting to reach the
bathroom following the administration of chemotherapy because staff were either not available or
refused to help them. There have also been reports of patients catching golden staph infections
following surgery for breast cancer. How many more other issues don’t we know about? We’ve also
been made aware of plans to remove the limited radiotherapy services, forcing our community to
travel to the bigger hospital 250 kilometres away to have their treatment.
This newspaper has been a long term supporter of the cancer service over the years and worked
with the community to raise money for the purchase of medical equipment, the establishment of a
McGrath Breast Care Nurse and coffee and tea making facilities in the patient lounge area. We were
told that things would be better once after the health reform initiatives, as decision making would be
in the hands of a local board. This has not happened at all. What has this new hospital board been
doing? It is time for an urgent examination of the hospital cancer services and some answers to the
way people in this community are treated if they have cancer. This newspaper will also be seriously
considering its continued fund raising support for the hospital."
You are the manager of all disciplines in this cancer service at Mergbonia Hospital, a small country
public hospital providing mostly generalist services. You have only been in the position for a month,
having worked as a registered nurse in the chemotherapy unit at Mergbonia Hospital for the last eight
years. You completed a postgraduate masters level course in 2012 and this is your first management
role.
The local newspaper has been consistently publishing negative stories over the past few months
about the hospital but mostly about the cancer service – ever since the owner’s mother died in
Mergbonia Hospital many months after having surgery for colon cancer. There was no suggestion of
any misadventure.
The general manager is furious, as there is an annual town fete scheduled for June this year, and he
was hoping that the newspaper would be able to raise a significant amount of funds. He was of the
belief that any funds raised would be donated to the cancer service, and he was planning to use
these funds to replace old equipment that the hospital cannot replace with existing limited funds.
He is also concerned about his future at Mergbonia Hospital, as his annual performance appraisal
with the Chief Executive Officer is due in six weeks, and this last editorial will almost certainly be
highlighted in this meeting. Additionally, the hospital is due for their organisation-wide accreditation
survey (EQuIPNational Standards 1 to 15) in three weeks.
You are summoned to the general manager’s office, whereby he begins to yell at the top of his voice
about the incompetence of the cancer service and your lack of management skills. He is astounded
that you have allowed these events to occur and continues to berate you for your lack of standard
setting in the service. He gives you no opportunity to justify any opinions about the validity of the
information contained in the editorial. His voice is so loud that any staff walking past are aware that
he is referring to you and the cancer service.
He informs you that this is totally your responsibility as these issues have occurred in your service
and that you have a fortnight to resolve them. Finally, he conveys that he knew you weren’t up for the
job of manager and did not support the decision but was overruled by the other two members of the
interview panel. He is going to be watching you very carefully from now on, and any further evidence
of poor performance will be conveyed directly to the Director of Clinical Services. He orders you out
of his office and tells you that he hopes the next time he sees you will be in the office of the Director
of Clinical Services during your termination of services conversation.
Editorial Issues
1. Construct a one-page briefing (according to the briefing template) for the hospital board which
addresses the issue of this latest editorial and provides recommendations to deescalate the issues
identified and provides advice on how the board should respond. (~300 words)
2. Develop a background paper on the importance and significance of the issues and the rationale
behind your chosen recommendations utilising contemporary literature. (~800 words)
Relationship with General Manager
3. Propose potential reasons for the behaviour of the general manager towards you, utilising
contemporary literature. (~ 600 words)
4. Recommend relevant strategies to improve the working relationship between the general manager
and yourself, utilising contemporary management theories. (800 words)
Criteria: 20% Analyses and reframes the issues demonstrating a depth of knowledge about management
theories
20% Considers relevant management and leadership theories to guide the response to the board and
the general manager
35% Recommends relevant strategies for the response to the board and the general manager that
demonstrates a depth of knowledge associated with managing staff
5% Formulates a clear and logical approach within a professional report structure
10% Validates perspectives through correct interpretation of relevant and current literature (> year
2003)
10% Produces correct grammar, spelling, formatting, style (report – green paper), and referencing

This is should be written in a report style

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Watch Nosferatu at [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KO5mMVeFZEQ ] from 17:44-24:00 and write an analysis on how the director acheives suspense through aesthetic choices. Focus on how the director uses specific filmic elements (shot composition, lighting, camera angles/height/movement, editing, etc) to emphasize suspense within the narrative. Use visual evidence from the shot sequence (cite using time code [ex; 17:44]) and precise film terminology to support your thesis. Approach the scene as a whole; do not focus on one portion of the scene.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Subject Area: Real Estate
You are a Planning Officer employed by Westminster City Council. You will be preparing a planning report to the local planning committee on a proposal by Kydonia Holdings to build a mixed housing, commercial and retail development on a site in Moxon Street, Westminster.

The 0.33 hectare site is owned by Westminster Council, and is currently used as a public car park and temporary farmers market.

Your report will need to include an appraisal of the site and its surroundings, an analysis of the legal and planning issues arising from the proposal, and a recommendation as to whether the scheme should be approved or refused.

You will be provided with a copy of the planning application, a site plan, drawings of the proposed scheme, and letters received following consultation.

You will need to examine and apply any relevant national, regional or local planning policies in completing the report and making your recommendation.
The Development site is bounded by Moxon Street, Cramer Street, Aybrook Street and St. Vincent?s Street. It is a 10 minute walk from the Marylebone Campus.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Description and Purpose
The research paper is a documented, argumentative essay seven to ten pages in
length. Its purpose is not only to report facts, but to pursuade as well. You, the
writer, will defend an assertion (your thesis) by presenting your ideas, supported by
outside sources. Your aim is to convince the reader to accept your assertion and
perhaps even act on it. The research paper is not merely a report. It is not a group
of quotations strung together with an occasional “next” or “consequently.” It is not
an essay consisting of unsupported personal opinions and sweeping generalities. It
is not a rehash of old, set arguments or stale topics.
This paper is a bit of investigative reporting followed by editorial writing. The
project goes beyond simply gathering information on a topic and reporting on it.
That is an important first step, but you will then analyze and evaluate that
information in order to use it in an essay that presents a reasoned argument.
Overall, approach this paper as your attempt to increase your awareness of
whatever topic you have chosen.
You will be working on a controversial topic. The controversy might center on
causes, effects, or solutions. Sometimes even the existence of the problem is
controversial. You must realize as you do your research that all sources are in some
ways biased and that all sources include one or more opinions as well as the actual
topic. Do not assume that everything you read in a printed or electronic source is
true or even objective! Learn to bring a “scholar’s skepticism” to your reading or
controversial topic. When you present your own findings and opinions, do so
responsibly, carefully, and logically.
Pretend for a moment that your topic is the “three strikes” law. You will need to
read widely in order to decide how you stand on the various issues included in this
topic. You will discover very quickly that there are several versions of the “truth.”
Perceived causes may turn out to be effects of larger causes, and proposed
solutions often threaten to cause further problems. Don’t be alarmed! This
complexity is actually good news, indicating that you are researching a
controversial and complex topic. Do not follow the examples of news anchors or
politicians; do not oversimplify your topic. Avoid concluding your paper with a
vague “we must do everything we can.” If in the process of researching your
controversial topic or problem you found it to be inextricably linked to several
other problems, say so.
Specifications
The research paper will include the following:
• properly headed first page
• seven to ten page argumentative essay with MLA parenthetical
documentation of sources
• works cited page
Steps in the Process
1. Select a general topic. Many students find this first step a bit overwhelming;
however, careful thought and prewriting usually leads to a good topic. One good
way of becoming aware of current, argumentative topics is through reading
newspapers. Many times, writers will present their topics in the opinion section of
the newspaper and days later, readers will submit responses to the topic. If you
have a topic in mind, look for discussion in print media, and “Google search” it as
well. If you are not sure what your subject might be, consult print media as well.
Something may be printed that inspires you to investigate it further. Select a topic
as early as possible and stick with it! Changing your topic will only lead to long
nights and consequently, a bad research paper.
2. Organize your ideas and guide your research by formulating research questions
about your topic. Determine in your own mind what you need to find out about
your topic. For example, if the topic is the feasibility of the “three strikes” law, you
might formulate the following questions:
–What do the various three strikes proposals call for?
–Who supports the proposals and why?
–Have they been tried and with what results?
–How much would implementation cost?
–What would be the benefits of implememtation?
–Is any one version of the three strikes concept superior than others?
Some of these questions may have overlapping answers; some may be combined
later. Some may be major points and some minor. However, developing research
questions is an important step toward guiding your research and eventually to
organizing your essay. By using your research questions as a guide, you avoid
wasting your time reading materials that have nothing to do with your topic.
3. Doing the research. During this phase of the project, your mission is to seek out
as many sources as you feel are necessary to support, defend, and explain your
thesis. This project requires that you find at least twenty different sources and keep
track of them using the prescribed MLA notecard format. Obviously, you probably
won’t cite all twenty sources in your paper, but by finding these sources, you will
have done substantial research on the subject.
The notecard format is straightforward. First, you will need to purchase a package
of 4×6, ruled notecards. On the front of the notecard, develop a works cited entry
for the source following specific MLA guidelines. Also, be sure to state where you
found the source in the upper left hand corner of the card (this may be the call
number of a book, information about a magazine, or the URL from an online
source). On the back of the card, provide a brief summary of the source. What does
it say? How is it important to your topic? The summary is for you! Provide just
enough information so that you remember exactly what the source says and how it
influences your topic. Keep your notecards in alphabetical order as they will be
required in your final packet.
4. Formulate a clear thesis statement. In most cases, your thesis statement will
undergo some sort of revision throughout the course of your research. A clear, well
defined thesis statement is crucial to the success of your paper.
5. Prepare an annoted bibliography. Creating an annotated bibliography calls for
the application of a variety of intellectual skills: concise exposition, succinct
analysis, and informed library research. In essence, what you’re doing here is
choosing five sources you definitely plan on using in the paper
First, locate and record citations to books, periodicals, documents, or online
sources that may contain useful information and ideas on your topic. Briefly
examine and review the actual items. Then choose those works that provide a
variety of perspectives on your topic.
Cite the book, article, or document using MLA format.
Write a concise annotation that summarizes the central theme and scope of the
book or article. Include one or more sentences that (a) evaluate the authority or
background of the author, (b) comment on the intended audience, (c) compare or
contrast this work with another you have cited, or (d) explain how this work
illuminates your bibliography topic. I’ve included a sample annotated bibliography
in this handout.
6. Prepare an outline for the entire paper. Decide which of your research questions
are major points and which are minor. Organize them into a coherent plan. Begin
this outline with your thesis statement. Again, this will undergo revision as time
goes along.
7. Organize, write, and revise the first draft of your paper, carefully documenting
every idea or piece of information that came from a source. Remember that there is
no law stating that research papers must be dull and humorless. Also remember
that you are writing an argumentative paper here. Do not avoid controversy or
confusion. If these topics offered easy solutions, they would not be controversial.
8. Seek help when needed. Do not fear Mr. Senior! Come to me when problems or
questions arise. Set up appointments if you can’t make my office hours. I know this
project requires a great deal of work, but I am here to help.
9. Assemble your research paper. Obviously, more than any other paper you’ve
done this semester, this one requires substantial and careful proofreading. If your
computer equipment at home is unreliable, print your final draft on campus or at
Kinko’s.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Use the guidelines below to assist you in exploring, creating and presenting your personal literacy journey in any way you would like, e.g., through a poster, collage, scrapbook, traditional narrative, poem, song or using any media that you use to capture one or more aspects of your literacy development. The ideas below are intended to help you collect information about yourself rather than as particular components of your presentation (although they certainly could make up the elements of your presentation). Ultimately, you will need to decide what aspect of your literacy development you wish to focus on and how you will present it to others. Suggestions for getting started follow:

a. Think about three or four living members of your family, friends or colleagues who know something about your literacy development.
Make a phone call or email asking them if they would be willing to talk to you about your literacy development.
b. Think about the book you brought to class that impacted your life as a reader and also how writing has been involved in your literacy life.
c. Think of others outside your family who may have influenced your literacy development.
Make a list of questions you might want to ask them.
Record what they say and how they answered your questions. Get as many details as possible, including names, dates, and places.
d. Create a graphic organizer for how you will present your history.
e. As you construct your literacy history, look for themes and connections that you see running throughout your life that would lead to where you are as a student, as a reader, and as a teacher as well as a code breaker/meaning maker/ text user/text analyzer. (See Anstey and Bull for a description of these terms or use other paradigms to help you organize your thinking.)

In addition, you may choose any or all of the following to recount, describe, and analyze:

• Early family background
• Early schooling, elementary, middle school or junior high
• Secondary school and college years
• Professional induction years
• Graduate school
• Professional maturity
• Reflections on your professional life
• Reflections on your personal life
• Thoughts for the future
• Think of your identity as a reader and writer
• How you are a code breaker, meaning maker, text user, and text analyst

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

choose "Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?" and "The curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time."
explain what the source is (a very brief summary, no more than one sentence,is sufficient) and, more importantly , explain what its relevance is to your work. (each annotation should about 100-150 words.) my work is to analysis how monster hide their flaws. it should be looks like the sample i uploaded.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]