Category: Essays

Imagine, if you will, that the British government recently submitted a formal proposal to the UN Security Council, with the intent that it will go before the larger General Assembly. The proposal states the following: Given the challenges facing the international community due to greater instability and conflict with regard to the Palestinian-Israeli dispute and the Middle East in general, Her Majesty’s government, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, calls for a reconsideration of the historical borders in the region, which have proven to be incongruous with the realities of the lives of its people. The British, in their proposal, do not explicitly refer to the Sykes-Picot agreement or the creation of the Palestine mandate, but the implication of both is unmistakeable. They are, in effect, acknowledging that the problem is systemic and, if not addressed comprehensively, will result in a continuous serious of conflicts and insurgencies for decades to come, with no end in sight. It is as close to an admission of responsibility as anyone has ever heard from any of the great colonial powers of the early 20th century. Your assignment: In 500 to 1000 words, tell me why the British proposal to “reevaluate” the current borders is an effective or ineffective response to current conditions, including the Arab-Israeli conflict.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

You have a corrections officer who has worked in the county jail for 7 years. He has been described as a dedicated, competent employee, one who is well respected by colleagues and administrators alike. However, personal problems have arisen in his life. His wife is filing for divorce, and his daughter, contrary to his wishes, is involved with a man who has been arrested on several occasions for domestic violence. On this particular day, he reports for work tired and irritable after dealing with problems at home. One 18-year-old inmate quickly begins to get on his nerves. He never stops complaining, with most of his complaints directed at the officer. Finally, after telling the inmate to “shut up or else” several times, the officer lost control and slapped him hard across the face, leaving a mark and a small cut. The confrontation was witnessed by other inmates. This is the first time that this has happened to the officer. His supervisor sends another officer to cover his post, and he reports to the superintendent’s office. He recounts the incident, concluding with “I did it; I hit him hard and deserve to be fired. Or would you let me resign? I am very sorry it happened this way.” During the initial investigation, the superintendent feels confident that the officer has violated several tenets outlined in the code of ethics for public safety personnel, and he forwards his disciplinary recommendation for your review. Assignment Guidelines Research the correctional officer codes of ethics to confirm any potential violations, as outlined by the superintendent. Then, address the following in 750-1,000 words: After completing your review of the case file, explain what you would do under these circumstances. For this task, you should first explain the role of corrections agencies and then research different codes of ethics related to corrections officers, and base your responses on a particular code of ethics. You can choose from codes of ethics promulgated by different professional associations such as the American Correctional Association, or you can use the code of ethics promulgated by a particular state’s department of corrections. •What codes of ethics can you identify and how might they apply to this scenario? Explain. ?Would you fire the corrections officer? Why or why not? ?Would you allow him to resign instead of terminating him? Why or why not? ?Is there another course of action that you would consider taking? If so, explain. •Rationalize the decision you make. ?How much weight, if any, should legitimately be given to his personal problems? Explain. ?To what extent, if any, would your decision be guided by the institution’s subculture? Explain. Achievements

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Post an executive summary of your Comprehensive Project in the body of a post in this discussion (please do not use attachments). Summary should contain the following: The most popular way for international expansion is for a local firm to acquire foreign companies. One of the most benefits for international expansion is global distribution capability that helps expanding the market share. There are different implications of running a company that is within or outside of the European Union. An Executive Summary is a one-page document that outlines the purpose, process, findings, discussion, and findings of a report submitted to management. CEOs often read and assess an Executive Summary before deciding to read the entire report, so this must be high quality narrative that demonstrates the significance of the work undertaken, the objectivity of research and analysis underpinning the report, and the credibility of the resulting conclusions. Please review the Executive Summaries of other students, providing an objective assessment and constructive feedback that will help strengthen the effectiveness of their efforts and the quality of the finished report.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Please use the below References only to complete. Summaries’ the articles and issues of the Tony Abbott and the Japanese Submarines. Ian McPhedran .(2015). Newscom.au https://www.news.com.au/national/retired-admirals-reveal-plan-to-use-australian-submarines-to-defend-japan/news-story/ddf066e9e2acdf2465191460c0300e91 Jesse Johnson. (2015). Japan Times News: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/09/16/national/politics-diplomacy/japan-waits-see-whether-new-australian-leader-will-rock-boat-defense/#.VwG9-HrSn-t Lindsay Murdoch. (2014). The Sydney Morning Herald :https://www.smh.com.au/world/australia-moves-close-to-buying-japanese-submarines-20141113-11lpem.html Reissa Su. (2016). International Business Times: https://www.ibtimes.com.au/japan-give-australia-secret-technical-data-soryu-class-submarines-1446954 The advertiser. (2015).South Australia: https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/japan-may-ditch-bid-to-sell-submarines-to-australia-if-tenders-called-by-federal-government/news-story/28780196e84e17f6753d24c744cd8c29

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Persuasion/Argument – Research Paper Topic: What is an efficient and effective way to provide energy for peaceful purposes that will meet the growing needs of civilization in the 21st century? (Narrow topic : Nuclear Energy) Write a logically-organized, clearly-written 8-10 page paper (one separate page for citations) with an identifiable thesis that is illustrated and supported by details including quotations, paraphrases and summaries of your research (Minimum of 5 sources required).

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Resources Attached: Lewis v. St. Cloud University 693 N.W.2d 466 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005) Nova Southeastern University, Inc. v. Gross 758 So. 2d 86 (Fla. 2000) Write a 850-1050-word paper in which you address all of the following questions for the cases: Lewis v. St. Cloud University 1. The court cites the seminal case of Mazart v. State of New York, which is discussed on pp. 702-7-3 of the Student Version. How does the court’s analysis in Lewis compare with Mazart? 2. Given the outcome in Lewis, how would you recommend that colleges and universities structure their relationship, if any, with the student newspaper? Would the fact that a student newspaper has a faculty advisor be more likely to suggest that the institution has some control, and thus potential liability, for the acts of student editors and journalists? Nova Southeastern University, Inc. v. Gross 1. What is the institution’s legal duty with respect to a student for whom it arranges an off-campus internship or practicum? 2. If the institution required the student to arrange her own internship or practicum, what would the institution’s legal duty be? 3. Is there any other way, in addition to warning students about any known dangers, that the institution could protect itself from liability (for example, having the student sign a waiver)? 4. If the internship were a noncredit activity that was recommended but not required by the institution, would this change the legal standard of duty? 5. Change the facts and assume that the plaintiff is a nonstudent who was injured by the actions of a student working in a required internship (for example, a student injured by the actions of a student teacher). What institutional liability, if any, might attach? For a thoughtful analysis of the “special relationship” doctrine, see Webb v. the University of Utah, 125 P.3d 906 (Utah 2005), in which the court rejected the plaintiff’s assertion that being required during a field trip to walk on an icy sidewalk by a faculty member, with an ensuing fall and injury, created a “special relationship” such that the institution was liable for his injury. The court concluded: It is certainly possible that a directive inducing detrimental reliance may be one that creates an unreasonable risk of harm to the people expected to follow it. Viewed objectively, we conclude that the directive to occupy and traverse the condominium sidewalk does not meet this standard. We reach this conclusion for several reasons. First, the directive given Mr. Webb’s class did not relate directly to the academic enterprise of the class. By this we mean that it is not reasonable to believe that any student would understand that his academic success, measured either by the degree of knowledge acquired or by the positive impression made on the instructor, turned on whether they abandoned all internal signals of peril to take a particular potentially hazardous route to view fault lines. . . . [T]he directive’s tangential relationship to the field trip’s academic mission leaves us with the firm conviction that it would not be reasonable for a student to rely on it. The instructor did not, therefore, exert the control which might be present in an academic setting to create a special relationship. 125 P.3d at 913. 2 cases study’s are attached. Writer will need to obtain Webb v. the University of Utah, 125 P.3d 906 (Utah 2005) You may use the Case Brief Analysis Template attached as a guide to analyze the cases.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

All answers to the Review Questions must be a minimum of 5 sentences in length. Provide fact and personal insight in your responses. ? Use a professional writing tone. Avoid using “I” in your responses. Avoid writing as if this is a personal journal entry. Avoid writing as if you’re speaking to a buddy. Use proper sentence structure. Use scholarly, business-level writing. ? Write the question number. You may write down the actual question if want. Writing the question does not count toward the minimum sentence requirement.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Please follow the instructions on the uploaded files. Also below I have provided some chapters where you can refer to and use them as sources. Chapters: 1.The Construction of Religion as an Anthropological Category – Week 1 2. An anthropological Excursion (page 30-48). – Week 1 3.Religion and Globalization Chapter 1. – Week 1 4. Just a Piece of Cloth? The European Debate on “the Islamic Headscarf” as a Case Study and Paradigm for an Emergent Intercultural Ethics Jan M. Jams – week 3 5.Is our God listening ? Exclusivism Inclusivism Pluralism – week 3 6.Muslim Transnationalism – brotherhood, networks, diasporas – Week 3 7. Pentecostalism A major Narrative of Modernity – Week 3 8. The many faces of Judaism: Sacred and Secular – week 4 9. Organized Hinduism: From Vedic Truth to Hindu Nation – week 4 10. Globalization and the Common Good – week 5 11. The two theories of modernity Tyler – week 5

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

This is a continuation of the previous order that was completed as I need to submit the second draft. Below I will be attaching a file of the essay that was completed and I would like for you to only expand on the essay provided within the attachment. Please follow the instructions below that I have also submitted previously when ordering the paper and expand with crucial information that is needed within the paper. The following instructions are: This is an assignment about the mistreatment of workers in certain industries. The industry I have chosen for this paper would be Journalism. In this paper, I would like for you to cover the issues of how these journalists are mistreated and to bring up an example of one company in a specific country that is known for mistreating their journalists through sending them to no-go zone countries such as Syria, Iraq, part of Lebanon, Yemen, Egypt, Mexico and so on with no protection for instance, and to compare it to other publishing companies around the world who may treat their journalists differently. (Please provide proof for Journalists being mistreated such as the number of deaths and imprisoned journalists in some areas that may be increasing as a result of no protection) In addition to this, the paper should include THREE different issues within the Journalism industry that reporters often face such as Freedom of speech, whether reporters rights protected by law and so forth. Also, I would like you to come up with what may be the possible strategies publishing companies should come up with in order to protect their workers from being harmed. This assignment should have official sources used such as through Google scholar or EBSCO. Below I have provided the way I would like this essay to be structured: Cross-Industrial Examination of Worker Treatment: 1. Introduction: General Issues Within the Industry 2. Section 1: Issue #1 – Introduction: – Body Paragraph 1: Background/Ethics/Legislation – Body Paragraph 2: Companies that fail to meet ethical standards of workers – Body Paragraph 3: Companies that meet ethical standards 3. Section 2: Issue #2 4. Section 3: Issue #3 5. Conclusion (What needs to be done with these issues)

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Six paragraphs required. Argument is logical, well thought-out presentations of ideas claim about an issue & supports. Focus on narrow issue. State specific in a thesis. Topic should be controversial or a problem. Reasons should be supported by facts, statistics, examples, personal experience, or expert testimony. Need quotations and citations, when paraphrasing and summarizing.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]