Category: Essays

Please do visual analysis+contextual analysis about ‘Seated Guanyin,sculpture’. I went to the MIA(Minneapolis institute of arts) and took picture of it. See this sculpture and write about visual analysis as you went to this museum and write about what you see about this sculpture and contextual analysis.

1.visual analysis( first 3 pages)
Here are a few tips:
1) Address as many of the formal elements of your artwork that you can, using the Visual Analysis Handout as a guide.
Additionally, make sure that you provide very detailed analysis of three elements(must be only 3 elements) that you think are the most significant or outstanding for your work of art. Go into greater depth on these three elements. (The Grading Rubric says you should write a “very detailed analysis of at least six”, but three is ideal.)

2) When you explain how you think the artwork was made, please keep that to one paragraph. This is a speculative process.
For example, if you don’t really know how this sculpture was carved, you need to imagine how it might have been done. Did only one artist work on this piece, or multiple artists? Who selected the stone? How did the carver work on such a heavy block? Was the creation process calm and quiet? What kinds of tools might have been used?

3) Write the paper as if you are describing this artwork to someone who has no idea what it looks like. Pretend I don’t know, and tell me in careful, descriptive language what you are looking at. Remember to give me the overall and the details, and find a way to organize your thoughts so I don’t get lost.

4) Stay away from context (except for naming the title of the artwork and its date, dynasty, and materials in the first paragraph)! For this Visual Analysis part of the paper, you shouldn’t need any outside resources. You shouldn’t have any footnotes or bibliography.

5) The titles of artworks are italicized.

6) Have someone else proofread your paper. They might catch mistakes that you, as the author, won’t notice. And, go to the Writing Center if you need help with your writing of English.

7) This is a formal paper, so please steer clear of casual language.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Answer one of the following 3 questions in a short legibly-written or
preferably typed essay of maximum 500 words:
1. Do you think that all students who major in economics should be required to take a
course in the history of economic thought? Why or why not? Explain.
2. Do you think that knowledge of the history of economic thought is useful to
students who don’t major in economics? Why or why not? Explain.
3. “Ideas are inherently conservative. They yield not to the attack of other ideas but to
the massive onslaught of circumstance with which that cannot contend.” (J.K.
Galbraith). Discuss with respect to either Classical economics, Marxian economics,
Neoclassical economics, Keynesian economics, or the Neoclassical Synthesis.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

All research is conducted within a particular ontological and epistemological paradigm. The production of a PhD, or any other form of social science research, thus necessitates a clear ontological and epistemological framework. Research must also conform to ethical philosophy and standards. This essay requires students to select and apply ontological, epistemological and ethical paradigms to their proposed research and to critically assess the philosophical foundations and ethical implications of their work.

Describe, discuss and critically evaluate your chosen paradigm and demonstrate how you will apply this paradigm to the design of your research. Consider and critically evaluate the ethical dimensions of your research. Equal weight will be given in the marking to the justification of your chosen paradigm and to the ethical dimensions of your research.

Marking Criteria
The essay should demonstrate:
1. A clear and critical understanding of research philosophy.
2. An appreciation of the fundamental differences between various paradigms.
3. Understanding of the link between research paradigms and methodology, and ability to contextualise own research within an appropriate paradigm.
4. Ability to critically evaluate research paradigms.
5. Critical understanding and analysis of the ethical paradigms covered in this module.
6. Ability to consider and critically evaluate the ethical implications of own research.
NB. Failure to engage with the philosophical and ethical paradigms covered in this module will automatically result in a fail.

Learning Outcomes
1. Distinguish and evaluate the philosophical underpinnings and methodological ramifications of different approaches to business and management.
2. Discuss and evaluate the roles that researchers can play and the ethical ramifications of adopting such roles.
3. Specify the philosophical underpinning and methodological ramifications of a research programme and the testing of its findings.
My research title is( Impact of Transformational and Servant Leadership on organisational Innovation: the role of Staff Satisfaction in Banks in Saudi Arabia)
I am going to use Quantitative method.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / ABSTRACT (about 100-150 words)
2. INTRODUCTION – usually 2-3 pages
(a) Background of your research
(b) Statement of the Problem
(c) Purpose of Study
(d) Specific Research Questions
3. BODY OF PAPER
this is the main part of the paper and consists of numerous sub-headings of what you are writing about.
– address what other studies have done on the same or similar problem/subject/topic and
state your specific contribution to the field.?
– support your ideas/arguments with real-life cases, company examples or data.
– use of original figures (e.g. conceptual model or framework) to depict your ideas is highly
encouraged (however, use of figures or tables from other studies is strongly discouraged)

4. MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS
– what valuable practical lessons can managers draw from your study?
5. CONCLUSION

* summary of your findings and suggestions for future research.
6. REFERENCES / BIBLIOGRAPHY / ENDNOTES

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

For this exercise, consider your career after graduation. What kind of “brand” would you like to build for yourself? Answer the following two questions concerning brand strategy to provide some marketing perspectives.
1. Define the 2-3 desirable, deliverable and differentiating points-of-difference you would like to establish for yourself in your business career in the long-run, this should capture your unique brand essence and positioning. In other words, in what ways can you be unique to other top-tier Undergraduates as your career progresses? What are the 1-2 key points-of-parity you will also need to negate any possible weaknesses?
2. What kinds of things will you need to do in the future that you are not doing now to achieve your desired positioning?
Be critical in terms of what this approach to your career does not consider/account for and the limitations of person branding.
Brand elements to consider in writing this assignment include: brand identity, brand image, brand values, how the brand is perceived internally and externally, co-branding potential, etc.
This is a reflexive exercise and can be interpreted in many different ways but make sure you access marketing-specific journals (e.g. Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Marketing Management, Journal of Macromarketing, Journal of Marketing, Journal of Consumer Culture) to provide theoretical support for your suggestions.
Visual analysis in the form of brand position maps or other figures are encouraged. If you wish to, you can write in the first person.
As marking is anonymous please take care not to include your name in the report.
3000 words maximum (+/- 10%), excluding references and appendices. I expect a structured essay with an introduction and conclusion. I also expect to see a title page with the course number and candidate number (not name) and an executive summary, these are not part of the word count. Where material is sourced (journals, websites) please ensure appropriate referencing is undertaken. Assignments should be submitting in Times New Roman, Size 12, with either 1.5 or 2.0 line spacing. Please use 2.54 cm margins and include page numbers.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Your paper should fill out a debate over a controversial ethical issue, developing more than one side and assessing the plausibility of each. Remember that the interest of thinking through such issues is not only to clarify your own judgments, but also to appreciate how people justify their judgments.
More information about how to write a good philosophy paper can be found here:
https://www.jimpryor.net/teaching/guidelines/writing.html
Relativism
Choose a controversial cultural practice and explain how a relativist theory would explain whether it is right or wrong. Then discuss whether Shafer-Landau’s objections to relativism are worrisome problems for a relativistic understanding of the practice you choose to focus on. (Relevant issues might concern moral infallibility, equivalency of moral views, moral progress, moral disagreement, the individuation of culture, and how cultural approval is determined. However, it is better to have a thorough examination of one or two problematic issues rather than cursory examinations of many.)
Do you think a version of ethical relativism is true? How would you articulate the view so that it gets around or responds to the objections we examined in class?
No matter which way you go on the issue of ethical relativism (for or against), please be sure to sympathetically develop the opposite side’s perspective and explain why you are not ultimately persuaded.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Guidelines for Word Study Paper:

10-12 original, data-based paper giving a historical analysis of the word Rascal, with professional literature as background and support. Can be from any period in the history of English and any English dialect, as long as it analyzes a change in meaning/use over time.

Sample Topic Angles:

# The development of the word rascal in contemporary English over Several prior decades.
# A change in the word meaning/use in progress.

The steps to do the paper:

# Use (COHA) Corpus of Historical American English to collect the data.
# The data should be from COHA database.
# Use the online Etymology Dictionary to refer to the origin of the word.
# Use the OED Dictionary to tell when the word starts to be used in each meaning.
# Use any reference you see it as helpful, there is no limitation on the number of references.
# The semantic change in this word is Amelioration, write about amelioration some paragraphs then introduce the word and discuss the data collected from the Corpus of Historical American English.
# Be precise in your analysis.
# Analyze when the different senses developed.
# Are they all being used in the beginning of 1800 and did anything changed over that time.
# The way you figure that is to look at lots of examples, like in 1810 you found 20 examples, you want to see which meaning occurs in those and are they the same one occurred in 1820, 1830, etc… was there a time when a new meaning started.
# We need to learn how the word has been used through time.
# Look at the examples you found and divide them up according to the different meanings of rascal. For example you can say this is the first time in American English that rascal has been used in this meaning not just the other meanings, so you trace it that way.
# Get different meanings from different dates.
# Categorize the meaning for each decade and then look if you see any pattern one decade to the next, or for example, if one meaning is used more in 1910 but less often in 1920 and compare and contrast that way.
# See when does the word changed from the negative meaning to the positive one.
# See if it was used in the past as it is used today.
# See when did the earlier meaning start to drop away.
# If you couldn’t make a long paper with the word rascal, you can supplement it with the word Cad which is another negative word for men; and also collect data for this word from COHA.

# Number all pages.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

I really don’t know where to get the online source. I hope you understand it better than I do.

Choose one of the world’s rivers. Using an online source, find and list its latitude and longitude, length, discharge, its point of origin (source), the elevation of its origin (source), where its mouth is located and the elevation of the mouth. Determine the change in elevation and the gradient. Review the rivers selected by two of your classmates and discuss the key features identified.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Topic I would prefer for this report is (Child care consultancy- Specialist Advise) but if the writer have another suggestion I am flexible but he/she needs to give me suggestion because I would like to choose.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Does Mexican Illegal Immigration EFFECT OR INCREASE Crime In the United States

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]