Category: Essays

Before you begin crafting your discussion response for this week, be sure to read required materials and watch Episode Three of the Designing Healthy Communities PBS miniseries. These episodes are designed to work with the readings to give you a broad understanding of the topics that we discuss in class.

In your readings for this week, the case studies focused on cities built on transportation. Oakland is one of the largest seaports in the United States and Detroit certainly has been an important hub of the automobile industry. Like it or not, the culture of the United States is automobile-centric. Many of us live more than a mile from the nearest business of any sort. This means that we do not typically walk to shops, to work, or to school. Some communities have increased bicycle traffic in their communities, while others have created natural spaces where extraneous exercise can occur.

This week, after watching the videos below, evaluate your neighborhood using the checklist at HFW-Walkability-Checklist.pdf. (If you have trouble accessing these videos, email your instructor for an alternative.)
•Public Health, Walking and the Built Environment – Part 1
•Public Health, Walking and the Built Environment – Part 2

Attach your finished checklist.

Now, post a discussion about your community’s walkability, using the following list of questions as a guide.
•How walkable is your neighborhood? Could people in your neighborhood walk to work or to the grocery store, for example? Are there sidewalks, trails, and parks?
•How bike-friendly is your neighborhood? Are there designated paths or lanes? Who is riding bikes?
•How else does your neighborhood encourage walking? (Take into consideration elements such as pedestrian malls, farmers markets, tree lawns, and parks. Don’t be limited by this list!)

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Workplace violence has become a growing concern for security managers over the past two decades. There have always been some problems associated with violence in the workplace, but recent decades have focused additional attention on this serious problem. Whether the violence is a result of a personnel problem such as disciplinary action,salary dispute, or termination, even a domestic dispute, employee’s do bring their problems to work. Far to often the pressure results in some form of violence against fellow employee’s, employers or the work facility.
Many organizations have developed polices and procedures to deal with acts of violence in the workplace. Most are in the form of Violence Intervention and Contingency Teams (VIACT) or Violence Response Teams (VRT).
Please detail your strategy using the VIACT or VRT model to include identifying what members of your organization will make up this model. Your model must include levels of discipline, is it progressive or dealt with case by case?. What impact does years of service or position with the organization have when determining discipline ?.

Book ref:
Contemporary Security Management, Third Edition 3rd Edition
Butterworth-Heinemann; 3 edition (November 22, 2010)

Author John Fay

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Developing a new security program or revising an existing one will be one of the most challenging responsibilities you will have as CSO. Your text makes a strong representation to the importance and utilization of the “three pillars” while developing a system
Do you agree with each sub category each pillar requires?. What about the need of conducting an organizational security assessment while developing a new or re-defining a current program?.
I have attached a very comprehensive check list for your review.

Book ref:
Contemporary Security Management, Third Edition 3rd Edition
Butterworth-Heinemann; 3 edition (November 22, 2010)

Author John Fay

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

REQUIREMENTS
1. Select an adult person to use as your subject for this assignment. Make sure that the person is on at least five (5) or more medications. You will want to consider any as needed (prn) medications that the person may have prescribed, including over-the-counter medications, and complementary alternative medicine.
2. Complete the following table regarding the five chosen medications.
Chamberlain College of Nursing NR292 Pharmacology II
NR292 Pharmacotherapeutic Guidelines.docx Revised 08/26/2014 RC 2
Medication (brand and generic) Dose Route Frequency Safety considerations
3. Gather relevant personal and medical history information from the person.
4. Provide three (3) nursing diagnoses for the person.
5. Describe any specific personal history information that could affect medication administration (age,
gender, ethnicity, culture, genetics, health beliefs, allergies, use of alternative therapies/herbal
supplements, etc.). Provide supporting literature for your analysis.
6. Nursing Implications: Discuss your role as a professional nurse in relation to the medications if you
were the person’s nursing care provider. Be sure to discuss the following.
? Nursing management
? Patient education related to
o assessment;
o drug therapy administration (pharmacokinetics);
o prevention and management of complications (e.g., drug-drug interaction, missed dose);
o signs and symptoms of adverse effects/complications; and
o nutrition, lifestyle choices, and habits.
7. Develop a concept map or poster based on the requirements above.(but I prefer concept map please)
8. List and cite references/resources in correct APA format.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Please answer the question of the state’s jurisdictional Sydney NSW Australia

By using your own state’s jurisdictional civil procedure rules and in approximately 1000 – 1500 words answer the following short answer questions.
Questions
1. Explain which court in your state would an action be brought where the monetary value of the claim was $35,000.00?
2. explain the civil process in your state to commence proceedings as well as all time limitations for the filing and service of all pleadings including the claim/application, notice of intention to defend, defence and/or counterclaim and reply. (All answers must be supported by reference to your state’s legislation and civil procedure rules).
3. Explain the discovery process in your jurisdiction including how documents and information are obtained from both sides?
4. What are the differences between mediation, arbitration and case appraisal in relation to civil procedure and how do the parties enter into these ADR procedures (are they voluntary or court appointed)?
5. Under what circumstances would a matter not be referred to the ADR process?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

1. Read “Fire in the Hole” and watch the film version (Season One, Episode One of Justified) in its entirety.

2. Choose one scene in the film version of “Fire in the Hole” that also appears in the book in some fashion (i.e., the scene in the movie can be a loose translation of a scene from the book). You may also choose to analyze the way the book vs. the film begins or ends, focusing on specific images or dialogue. Using the tools you have learned in Film Studies, and including at least five key terms from Film Studies in bold, write a 500-word (minimum) discussion post answering the following questions:

• What are the notable elements of the scene in the book? In the movie?

• How are the two scenes (book vs. movie version) similar? How are they different?

• Which version of the scene (book vs. movie version) is more successful, and why? What would you have changed if you were directing the film?

• Do both scenes (book vs. movie version) carry the same meanings and messages? The same primary focus?

• How does Justified engage with (or distance itself from) the themes and politics of coal mining?

• What is the final message (if any) about coal mining in “Fire in the Hole” and/or Justified

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

This paper asks you to provide answers to specific questions on EU studies material which requires that you conduct your own research. You will need to use academic sources for this just as if it were an essay. However, the answers you are required to provide to each question are far shorter than a normal essay; this is an exercise in conducting targeted research and condensing the knowledge you gain.
The questions focus on the issues covered in Term 1 of this module. Please answer five questions from the ten set out below, in no more than 500 words each (bibliographies should not be included in the word count). Sample answers, which provide an idea of the kind of answer required, are included after the list of questions. The questions do not necessarily ask you to provide a ‘right’ answer; rather, they ask you to provide a reasoned response based on the distillation of your research.
You will be marked based on the following criteria: 1) ability to answer the question, 2) command of the facts, 3) use of appropriate academic literature, 4) ability to reference that literature, 5) level of English.
You must cite the sources for your answers after each response and show that you have read widely. You should reference at least 3-4 academic sources in each answer. Credit will be given for the telling use of high-quality sources, especially if you have identified these yourselves rather than simply using those on the reading list. You can use textbooks but should also make use of some more advanced literature such as journal articles or monographs.
Wikipedia and other similar web-sites are not acceptable sources of information for this purpose. You must reference all your sources clearly using either the Harvard referencing system or footnotes, not a combination of both. Direct quotes must be identified as such. Failure to reference all your sources properly amounts to plagiarism, which is a serious academic offence that will not be tolerated.

Question:

Was Andrew Moravcsik right to claim that constructivist accounts of European integration are ‘indeterminate’? Why is indeterminacy problematic in a theory of European integration?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

An anthropologist studying first-year students at a university in the United States writes that friendly phrases like “How are you?,” “Nice to meet you,” and “Let’s get in touch” communicate politeness [BME1] rather than literal intent[BME2] . What, if anything, is the value or function of such polite speech?

In a well-written essay, develop your position on the value or function of polite speech in a culture or community with which you are familiar. Use appropriate evidence from your reading, experience, or observations to support your argument.
Pick either value or function.
3rd perosn, present time.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Question: To what extend did the Single European Act favour ‘negative integration’ over ‘positive integration’?

500 words no more with sources ** 4-8 Sources

For this question follow these rules:

This paper asks you to provide answers to specific questions on EU studies material which requires that you conduct your own research. You will need to use academic sources for this just as if it were an essay. However, the answers you are required to provide to each question are far shorter than a normal essay; this is an exercise in conducting targeted research and condensing the knowledge you gain.
The questions focus on the issues covered in Term 1 of this module. Please answer five questions from the ten set out below, in no more than 500 words each (bibliographies should not be included in the word count). Sample answers, which provide an idea of the kind of answer required, are included after the list of questions. The questions do not necessarily ask you to provide a ‘right’ answer; rather, they ask you to provide a reasoned response based on the distillation of your research.
You will be marked based on the following criteria: 1) ability to answer the question, 2) command of the facts, 3) use of appropriate academic literature, 4) ability to reference that literature, 5) level of English.
You must cite the sources for your answers after each response and show that you have read widely. You should reference at least 3-4 academic sources in each answer. Credit will be given for the telling use of high-quality sources, especially if you have identified these yourselves rather than simply using those on the reading list. You can use textbooks but should also make use of some more advanced literature such as journal articles or monographs.
Wikipedia and other similar web-sites are not acceptable sources of information for this purpose. You must reference all your sources clearly using either the Harvard referencing system or footnotes, not a combination of both. Direct quotes must be identified as such. Failure to reference all your sources properly amounts to plagiarism, which is a serious academic offence that will not be tolerated.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Go to https://www.appalshop.org/ami/ami-video-gallery/#/id0 and choose and watch one Appalachian film that appeals to you (most are about 15 minutes). Next, write a clear and cohesive script that details the following succinctly (remember that approximately 1,300 words equals close to 15 minutes of speaking):

Which movies did you choose to watch this week and why? (Note: please don’t discuss Coal Miner’s Daughter; instead, focus only on the movies you chose.)
What is the primary hillbilly figure found in each of your chosen movies? In your chosen Appalshop documentary?
Which overall picture of Appalachia do you find the most compelling, the most appropriate and/or the most successful, and why?
Which movie is quite simply the best and why? Why do recommend that we watch it? Critique at least two aspects of your other movie, the one you didn’t choose as your favorite, using at least three key terms from Film Studies.
Introduce us briefly to the movie you chose as your favorite. Why is it important and what message can we take away from it?
Now you are going to film yourself reading your script. Consider your background and your lighting, the time of day, and your setting. Consider your “costume” and appearance, and any props if necessary. You can film yourself using either a smart phone or tablet or a webcam using a program like Screencast-o-Matic (which has an option to record a webcam, or your computer screen and a webcam if you want to create slides to go along with your acting). Act out your script—as in, speak clearly, with great enthusiasm and energy. Command the attention of your audience. Make sure your film is no longer than 15 minutes.

*Of course I will do the video, but need helping typing the 15 minutes or so of dialog for the video. An essay type is fine. I will make the video work no problem as long as I have the dialog to speak to. Around 1,100 words will be plenty. The “movies” I chose to watch were Season 1 of the show Justfied (though I have seen it all now) and National Geographic’s documentary on the Appalachian Trail.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]