Corporate social responsibility Assessment task title: Essay Details of Task: This is an INDIVIDUAL assessment task. An essay on a question which investigates your understanding of CSR. The essay question is listed below so you can think about your response as you do your readings and discuss the ideas in tutorials. The essay question is: “There are many different ‘definitions’ of CSR which reflect different assumptions and approaches to the responsibility of corporations. What is your understanding of CSR and how does it contrast with other understandings?” ESSAY STRUCTURE: Introduction: General statement or orientation to CSR, Brief summary of the main arguments/points made in the essay Body Paragraphs: (each which discuss a specific idea in an attempt to address the essay question), need to work on framing argument within each paragraph. – Give a good examples of critical evaluation. – Tell which parts do you agree with? – The arguments should well formed and clearly articulated with good integration of knowledge from the readings to support writer’s position (Garriga, E., Mele, D. (2004) , Smith, N.C. (2003). , Friedman, M. (1970).) ; There is a clear indication that the students’ understanding of CSR is supported by relevant evidence. – Confidently synthesised, analysed and applied newly gained knowledge from the readings to present a solid and comprehensive understanding of CSR. Conclusion: Summary of the main points made in the body paragraphs. What you think about Friedman(1970) and Smith(2013) which one u agree. and tell your view about CSR. *HINT assessment 1 Although the book discusses “The case for and against CSR” we believe the very nature of this statement to be flawed. Our critical analysis of this idea may suggest: – Perspectives presented in the literature such as Friedman (1970) are NOT ANTI-CSR Rather, There is a group of perspectives, theories, ideas presented in the literature which may be termed the “Narrow view of CSR”. However, they too present legitimate CSR perspectives, which are not necessarily against CSR. We can therefore contest the textbook by suggesting that it does not present a “case for CSR” and a “case against CSR”. Rather, it presents a case for the “narrow view of CSR” and “the wider view of CSR” READING : (JUST USE THIS 3 IN ESSAY Reference List) – Garriga, E., Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory, Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 51-71 – Smith, N.C. (2003). Corporate social responsibility theories: whether or how?, California Management Review 45(4), 52-76 -Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13, 32-33, 122-124. **PLEASE DON’T USE IN-TEXT REFERENCE AT THE BACK OF THE SENTENCE LIKE the corporation could not have a responsibility (Friedman 1970) BUT USE THIS TYPE OF IN-TEXT REFERENCE For example , Friedman (1970) believe that the corporation could not have a responsibility. … Friedman (1970) mentioned that when a manager do the CSR… In Garriga and Mele (2004), the stakeholder will likely to chose the good reputation company In Smith’s (2003) Jounal, he mentioned that CSR keep ….
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]