This is a research paper for a cross cultural human resource management course, the topic is international negotiation in the oil and gas industry. instructions will be uploaded as a microsoft word file. Please follow the instructions it is very important to have that format for the paper
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]BlueBook Citation
Citations: any legitimate source (refrain from Wiki)
30 pages – or 15,000 words
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Write a 2000 word report which presents the proposed market research to be undertaken for the individual business start-up idea, running as a sole trader. The report must include a critical evaluation of the methods and approaches chosen for the market research and why it is important to undertake market research before setting up the business. You have include questionnaires in your report.
The following should be covered:
1 presentation of report
• All relevant sections clearly used and in a logical order
• Formatted appropriately using headings and subheadings
• Used appropriate academic language and key terms
• Appropriate use of the Harvard Referencing System
2 Content of the report:
• Is there a clear, well structured introduction to the report?
• Incorporated only relevant information to the chosen topic
• Has the student written in paragraphs that have a purpose and link with previous information
3 Critical analysis and academic supporting evidence
• Has critical analysis been used throughout the report?
• Has a suitable range of appropriate supporting academic evidence been used and engaged with?
4 Summary and Recommendations
• Has a clear summary of the information and findings been presented?
• Have recommendations been provided
• Has a brief rationale for the recommendations been provided
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Context:
Evaluate several films from the list I upload that deal with the issue of slavery. These films have attempted to dramatize various aspects of slavery. It becomes apparent when observing these films for their (historical and cinematic accuracy).
Requirements:
A strong argument needs to be made that discusses the various aspects of a good film on slavery. What are the features that a good reviewer would be looking for? Be sure to thoroughly explain what a film is supposed to do and how it is supposed to do it? This should be a four to five page analysis.
Next, pick three films to watch from the list I upload. Rewrite the film to make it fit into an accurate historical narrative of slavery. In rewriting it, critique the original and talk about how you would have changed the characters, plot, story, setting, and costuming of the original film. Explain how your rewrite would fix the problems associated with the original?
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]This coursework requires me to build a simulation model to identify the best configurations for the National Cranberry Coorperative case study(can be found online).
The key part to this assignment is the simulation model built using Excel, the report is only to explain the approach and recommendation to the company for improvements. Therefore, no reference needed. Thank you very much for the Excel model I am really struggling with it.
If you don’t mind could you also explain in details in other attachment explaining the how to build the Excel model so I can learn from it?
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]Here is the prompt: Almost 100 years later, is the Great Gatsby still relevant and if so, why? Refer back to text- think of this as somewhat of a comparison and contrast essay.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]the paper should be based on a questionnaire that captures the general view of business factors, specifically four (of your choice),
Each one of those four business factors can be explained using 4 sources (minimum 3) which is equivalent to 3-4 paragraphs a factor.
You may use any statistics you want in the survey, in order to formulate the research paper.
Please contact me about the factors you choose and regarding any questions.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator](A) USING ONE SPECIFIC MULTINATIONAL COMPANY (MNC) THAT IS HEADQUARTER IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING COUNTRIES- BRAZIL, RUSSIA,INDIA OR SOUTH AFRICA, MEXICO, NIGERIA OR TURKEY- IDENTIFY AND CRITICALLY EVALUATE THE STRATEGIES USED BY THE COMPANY TO INTERNATIONALIZE.
GUIDE LENGTH 1800-2000 WORDS. LEARNING OUTCOMES 1,2,3,4 & 5
(B) WHAT RECOMMENDATIONS i.e FUTURE STRATEGIC DIRECTION, WOULD YOU MAKE FOR THE MNC TO SUSTAIN ITS COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE ? GUIDE LENGTH 1000 WORDS, LEARNING OUTCOMES 4&5
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator] rebuttal on key changes in both foreign and domestic policy over the past 50 years to convince this Third World country to join with the Americans as allies in the Cold War
Imagine you are an American diplomat in 1970. You are part of a team sent to a strategic Third World country in hopes of making an alliance. Soviet diplomats have been there before you and have suggested to the leaders of this Third World country that the United States should not be trusted as a partner because of how Americans treat their own minority populations. You have been asked to provide a formal, written rebuttal to the Soviet claims.
After giving the matter some thought, you have decided to base your rebuttal on key changes in both foreign and domestic policy over the past 50 years to convince this Third World country to join with the Americans as allies in the Cold War. You realize that you cannot simply “sugarcoat” things and be believable, therefore you plan to provide a thoughtful response that does admit inequities in American society in addition to discussing ongoing changes and positive policies.
Note 1: Successful responses will consider a broad range of evidence in support of arguments. Take a few moments to consider how you would respond by making a list of both “good” and “bad” aspects of American society and policy. When looking at the “good,” ask yourself why they are good for the purposes of this rebuttal, how would non-Americans perceive things? When looking at the “bad” (which is what the Soviets used against us in the Cold War, as well as the Nazis in WWII, as propaganda), consider change over time. Are there groups working toward ameliorating the bad? Are public policy changes taking place, even if at a slow pace? Or is nothing being done? Admitting injustices while discussing efforts at reform may be enough to sway someone to your side.
One way to organize would be along the lines of first discussing domestic socio-economic issues, followed by domestic political issues, and finally foreign policies in the era under discussion. Remember that each of these elements of the overall argument would have its own paragraph and thesis (the rule of three)
THE “RULE OF THREE”
.
You will need to use an analytical writing style in this class. The basic form of analytical writing utilizes the “Rule of Three.” Simply, there should be at least three key points/pieces of evidence in a piece of writing introduced by a strong clear thesis.
This is a 2-3 page essay length assignment. Your paper should begin with an Introduction which sets the prompt in the historical context, the LAST sentence of the intro paragraph is the thesis statement which lists the (minimum of) three points (X,Y,Z) that will be more fully developed in the paper. The first paragraph of the body (paragraph 2) would discuss key point X (this paragraph would have its own thesis as the first sentence, followed by three pieces of evidence/analysis in support), then a paragraph on Y, and finally one on Z. An essay ends with a conclusion paragraph – which sums up the argument you made and ties X, Y, and Z together. The conclusion is NOT the place to introduce new arguments or evidence.
Another way of thinking about it is that an essay is comprised of three paragraphs in the body of similar composition to the one paragraph you wrote in the Reaction 1 exercise.
So Rule of Three means three key points in a thesis, a body with three paragraphs (one for each of your key points), each paragraph has a thesis supported by three key pieces of evidence. Followed by a conclusion
Note 2: This is a real-life situation, there was a fight for the hearts and minds of the world. The Cold War is an ideological (and sometimes hot) battle over two socio-economic/political systems and 1970 is in the heart of the Cold War. Who will be the victor was not yet clear. Most of the Third World nations courted by the United States were not European, therefore how the US treated minorities would be a cause for concern. But these nations would also have very real geopolitical considerations beyond American domestic policy to consider. The Soviet propaganda was meant as a wedge. Also remember that no nation or society is perfect, that is not what you are arguing here. In your persona as a diplomat from 1970, you are giving an honest assessment of the US, warts and all, in hopes of gaining an ally.
Secondary sources:
These are the sources that can be used: 1. John Broesamle,Anthony Arthur: Clashes of Will…Chapters 6,7,8,9,10
2. Jacqueline Jones,Thomas Borstelmann,Vick L. Ruiz. Created Equal: A History of the United States. Volume 2,Since 1865
Primary sources:
3. Jo Ann E. Argersinger. The Triangle Fire: A Brief History with Documents.
4. https://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html
5. https://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/hss/SSA_SHARED_MEDIA_1/history/MHL/US/documents/Voting_Literacy_Test_1965.html
6.https://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/hss/SSA_SHARED_MEDIA_1/history/MHL/WW/documents/Women_Statement_of_Purpose_1966.html
7. https://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/hss/SSA_SHARED_MEDIA_1/history/MHL/US/documents/Chavez_He_Showed_Us_Way_1978.html
8.https://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/hss/SSA_SHARED_MEDIA_1/history/MHL/US/documents/House_Judici_Concl_Impeach_1974.html
9.https://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/hss/SSA_SHARED_MEDIA_1/history/MHL/US/documents/Roe_v_Wade_January_22_1973.html
10.https://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/hss/SSA_SHARED_MEDIA_1/history/MHL/US/documents/Carter_Wall_Racial_Segregation.html
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]At the end of Week 7, your Signature Term Paper is due. Because Week 7 is the last week of the semester, and grades are due a short time after the end of the semester (which is Monday December 15 at 12:01 am), you MUST submit your paper via the dropbox by Sunday, December 14th at 11:59 pm CT.
Here are the instructions for the final paper (they are also available on the Week 7 Written Assignment page):
To demonstrate your ability to apply the Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Modules, along with core concepts and evidence based treatment approaches covered in this overall course, you will apply a framework incorporating an understanding of both individual and system factors to the case of Susan (download the case study from the Week 7 assignment page).
.Provide a trauma-informed assessment of your client. Be sure to highlight developmental and cultural factors that are salient to the assessment, and conceptualizing the etiology (cause) of Susan’s issues presented in the case study.
Identify the most immediate treatment issues for your client.
Describe efforts you have made to develop a treatment plan in collaboration with other systems involved in the child’s life.
Summarize the trauma focused treatment approach with the client. Be sure to address the following in your discussion:
Engagement & Stabilization
Advocacy
Building emotional regulation skills
Building cognitive process skills
Building meaning-making skills
5. What do you think are Susan’s specific psychological disorders? Discuss any co-morbidity issues.
6. What would possibly be your emotional response (countertransference reaction) to this case.
Important: In your paper, please number your answers per the corresponding questions above. The expected length is 6 (minimum) – 8 pages (maximum), excluding cover page and references (no abstract required). APA style format, citations and references must be used.
The rubrics for this paper and the actual case study (you can download it) are on the Assignment page for Week 7—the paper is worth a maximum of 100 points. Please know that, because this is a Signature assignment, I will be grading these papers very stringently according to the rubric (I have been a bit more relaxed on the smaller papers). I encourage you to get your papers in early, so I can grade early and give you time to ask about your graded papers and allow for time for advocacy of points earned.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.
[order_calculator]