International Pricing Policy of Armani

Basic assumptions: Price policy is most flexible instrument with the greatest direct impact on profit, the greatest direct impact on sales / revenues, the greatest direct impact on competitors and with low investment and costs.

? What are the key factors in the price decision of your brand?
? On what basis would you calculate the appropriate price for your brand?
? Price elasticity is an important factor in the price decision. Regarding price elasticity what do you assume for your brand and what does that mean for the price decision?
? Free trade and ubiquity of products and the overlapping of information in markets causes gray markets. How do you see that for your product and what do you want to do in this situation?
? For your brand in a market of your choice do you choose a penetration (low price) or a skimming (high price) strategy and why?

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

The role of digital marketing in the US firearm industry

The Dissertation Proposal have to have MINIMUM 7 journal articles, 5 web pages and 3 books as references.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

sociology the Heterosexual Imaginary

Provide documentation from the assigned reading. Do not use any external sources for this. Based on your readings and class lectures answer the following questions. PROVIDE EVIDENCE FROM THE READING FOR YOUR ANSWERS.

QUESTION: Compare, contrast, and discuss the theoretical positions of Chrys Ingraham in the Heterosexual Imaginary.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

healthcare ethics

Define the Basic principles of healthcare ethics, Beneficence,maleficence, justice, autonomy and fidelity. Cite at least one healthcare associated example.
Text book LPN to RN transitions by Lara Claywell, second edition.

Your paper has to be at least 2 pages long.

The two pages do not include the cover page, Abstract and reference pages.

Use proper APA guidelines https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/

Use proper APA citation https://www.citationmachine.net/

Remember to use scholarly articles and your text books for references.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Biography on someone of importance to the U.S. before the civil war

Written Assignment Instructions – Each student will be required to write a two or three page paper that will be worth 100 points. Late papers will not be accepted but early papers are encouraged. Papers turned in at any time before the end of the sixth week of class will be graded and allowed to be corrected for full credit. Always turn in assignments via Blackboard.

Students must choose a biography of not less than two hundred pages on a person who is related to the period of American history that we are studying. No novels, autobiographies, comic books, or coffee table books are allowed. Books must be approved by the instructor by the end of the second week of class. There is a sample paper on Blackboard to give you an idea what this paper should consist of. BE WARNED: this assignment is not a typical book report.

The format of the paper MUST be as follows:
?A.?Use a standard 12 point font with a 1 inch margin and double-space your text. DO NOT add extra spaces between paragraphs. The paper must be a minimum of two pages and a maximum of three.
?B.?Use a cover sheet containing the student’s name, title of the book, author of the book, date submitted, course name, and course time slot. Center and double-space.
?C.?The first sentence of the first paragraph MUST read, “The main idea of the book was…” followed by your ONE WORD explanation. The main idea is the thesis, the one idea that holds the book together. It is NOT the same as the purpose of the book or the subject of the book. Be sure you understand the difference. If not, ASK!
?D.?The body of the paper MUST consist of the proof for the main idea. Give and explain three examples or reasons that the author uses to support the main idea. See sample outline below and the sample paper on Blackboard in the documents section.
?E.?The final paragraph MUST be your critique of the book. Summarize your paper. Did you enjoy reading it or not? Explain your decision.
?F.? Helpful hints:
?1.?Do not use contractions.
?2.?Do not use ANY quotations from the book. Use only your own words.
?3.?Write everything in past tense.
?4.?Spell out numbers except dates (day of the month, year of the century, etc.)
?5.?Develop the main idea with specifics, not generalizations.
?6.?The first time you mention a person’s name, use their full name, after that, use only their last name.
?7.?Double check your spelling and grammar.
?8.?Find a book about something you are interested in.
?G.?If you follow the instructions for this assignment you should get an A. Read your book, think carefully, and write clearly. Failure to follow any of these instructions WILL result in a loss of points.
?H.?If you have any questions, ASK! ASK! ASK!

This outline may be used to help form your thoughts. DO NOT turn in an outline. Your paper must resemble the sample paper posted to Blackboard.

Introduction
1.?The main idea of the book was ______________.
?a.?Reason 1
?b.?Reason 2
?c.?Reason 3
2.?Conclude introduction

Body
I.?Reason 1
?A.?Support for reason 1
?B.?Support for reason 1
?C.?Support for reason 1
?D.?Conclude reason 1

II.?Reason 2
?A.?Support for reason 2
?B.?Support for reason 2
?C.?Support for reason 2
?D.?Conclude reason 2

III.?Reason 3
?A.?Support for reason 3
?B.?Support for reason 3
?C.?Support for reason 3
?D.?Conclude reason 3

Conclusion
1.?Summarize introductory paragraph in one or two sentences
2.?Discuss whether or not you liked the book in two or three sentences

THE PAPER IS ON THE **THEME OF THE BOOK** ex
The main idea of the book was obsession. It was an obsession that spanned many lives and many decades, and wore many names. In South Dakota, it was Doane Robinson, an historian and avid promoter of the state’s many virtues, along with Peter Norbeck, a native of the state who rose through the ranks of state government to the United States Senate, who wanted to bring the bountiful fruits of the tourism industry home. Then, there was the general obsession by the American people, or at least the wealthy and influential ones, to memorialize every great person or important event in American history. Finally, there was Gutzon Borglum himself, the sculptor of Mount Rushmore. His was a life of obsession from beginning to end.
South Dakota was a beautiful place, but out of the way. It also had a seriously flagging economy. Robinson and Norbeck felt that by exploiting the natural beauty and history of South Dakota they could draw tourists from all over the country, and perhaps the world, into their backyard thus breathing new life into the economy. The problem was getting them there. They concluded that the Black Hills should be the centerpiece of their plan, with some sort of monument to the important figures of the region such as General George Custer, killed at Little Big Horn, along with Sioux heroes such as Sitting Bull or Crazy Horse. As the automobile began to weave itself into the fabric of American culture, roads began to criss-cross the countryside. Robinson and Norbeck wanted some of those roads to lead into South Dakota.
On a national scale, the politicians and those that backed them became interested in building memorials and monuments to the great deeds that had been done in America. Many Civil War monuments were built during this period; shrines to Abraham Lincoln in the North, Robert E. Lee in the South. Washington D.C. had been left largely unfinished and now it was time to finish it as the originators had intended. Many great works were commissioned, with architecture and sculpture being predominant. Monuments were made to George Washington,
Thomas Jefferson, Lincoln and many others. Federal buildings were ornate and often reminiscent of ancient Greek structures. Cities across America wanted to memorialize something; battles, important historical figures, even contemporary heroes who still lived. Thousands upon thousands of dollars were appropriated by the government or spent by wealthy patrons every year to make these memorials possible, many of which Borglum was a part of.
Now we must look at Borglum himself. He was obsessed with greatness, particularly the greatness of art. Borglum never let little things like money (or a lack thereof), friendship, propriety, or common sense get in the way of his art. He often spent his own money on his projects and actually lost money on some of his best work. He constantly railed against (and ultimately alienated) the art establishment as being inferior. Borglum was also obsessed with great men, and wanted to be one himself. He was fascinated by Lincoln in particular, but had a deep appreciation for the Founding Fathers as well. He was a personal friend and fervent supporter of Theodore Roosevelt, and throughout his life he campaigned for many different political candidates and causes, even becoming associated with the Ku Klux Klan for a time.
One must put all of these factors together with the national sentiment toward monuments and the invitation by Norbeck to carve a monument in the Black Hills in order to fully appreciate Mount Rushmore. The author put it best describing this colossal monument as “Great Men carved by a Great Man”. It had never been done before, and nothing like it will ever be done again. Only Borglum could have conceived it, and only he could have finished it.
I thoroughly enjoyed this book. Mount Rushmore is a marvel of art, engineering, and perseverance. The book also tells the many streams of history that converge there: the Sioux, the bikers of Sturgis, Custer, Washington, Jefferson, Roosevelt and Lincoln, simple miners, Rodin, and the millions of tourists who visit each year. Definitely a must read.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

International Law

Do not use long quotes. Cite the materials you use fully and completely in the test, including page numbers, providing full citation in footnotes. Incorporate multiple sources into your answers.
Answer both questions!5 pages each.
Question 1:
One of the fundamental principles of international law governing international relations is the principle of non-use of force in dispute settlement in the international arena. With this in mind:
A) Discuss the use/non-use of force in international law from the standpoint of both customary and conventional law. Your discussion should address all of the following points: (a) the evolution of thinking on the use of force in dispute settlement, particularly from circa the first world war; (b) the conceptualization and codification of customs on the use of force in modern international legal instruments such as the Charter of the United Nations and the Declaration on Principles of International Law and Concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
(B-1) Discuss the use/non-use of force in the Case concerning military and paramilitary activities in Nicaragua(Nicaragua v. US). How did the Court justify its jurisdiction in spite of the US opposition? Was the US justified in its position in the Nicaragua case? Why or why not? Was the International Court of Justice correct in ruling against the United Stares and in its determination of the principles of international law it applied?
(B-2) Compare and contrast this case with the March 2011 US/NATO use of force in Libya against the Gaddafi regime, which led to the regimes demise. How did the US/NATO justify their intervention in Libya? What role did the UN play or not play? Was the intervention justified under international law? Will need to research Libya case.
Question 2: Scenario
Jorge Salazar was a Colonel in the Guatemalan military and paramilitary functionary in the operation known as the “Operation Condor,” which terrorized Guatemala’s indigenous Maya population in the 1980s during the civil war in Guatemala. Eyewitness testimonies proved without any doubt that he was a member of the force which engaged in crimes against the indigenous population of Guatemala, crimes such as killing and raping , targeting Indigenous religious and cultural institutions, destroying their villages and towns and forcibly removing them from their ancestral homelands, a policy that came popularly known as “ethnic-cleansing”. Eyewitness argued that Salazar no only participated in indiscriminate crimes against indigenous communities, but also engaged in specific, well-planned, targeted crimes against indigenous peoples whom Salazar accused of being a danger to the wee-being of the Guatemalan state by virtue of his belief that were part of a movement to establish an Indigenous Maya state in Guatemala without the consent of the government of Guatemala.
After the war in the countryside subsided, Salazar found his way to Chicago as an illegal immigrant to live in a predominately Guatemalan community. As luck would have it, Jantos Rodriguez, who had been tortured by Salazar in Guatemala, but had survived and eventually came to the untied States as a refugee, ran into Salazar in a bar. Unaware that he had been spotted, Salazar slowly took the last sip from his wine, stood, up and went home. Rodriguez followed him home, noted the address, and. later that week, his lawyer filed a suit before a US court, accusing Salazar of crimes against humanity, including the torture of one Rodriguez.
The court ordered the arrest of Salazar and he was brought before the court. The first thing that Salazar did was to argue that the United States has no jurisdiction aver his case as events occurred in a territory other than the territory of the United States. Second, he held that whatever he had done he had done while executing a war and under those orders of his superiors which absolved him of any responsibility for the crimes of which he is accused. “Things.” he said, “sometimes got out of hand in the course of war.” He argued that he should not be held responsible for the developments beyond his control.Later, in the course of the deliberations of his case, he would also indicate that he became a party to some atrocities against indigenous civilians for the fear that, if he had not done so, he would have been executed by his superiors. Keeping these facts in mind and assuming that the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) decided not to get involved in the case, please answer the following questions:
(a) Does a court in the United States have Jurisdiction over Salazar? If so, under what national and/or international principles and/or conventions apply?
(b) Does a court in the United States have Jurisdiction over Salazar under US domestic laws?
(c) If the US courts are determined to have Jurisdiction in this case, what in your opinion should the verdict be and why? Discuss in detail against the background of the war in Guatemala?
discuss the questions with as much detail and specificity as you can by introducing relevant cases, principles, and customs of international law, as appropriate.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

Environmental Sustainability effects on Global Systems

the paper is two separate individual questions which should be just under 1000 words per question

or

if you can make them run smoothly and benefit the paper you can combine them for an assignment 1800- 2000 words

the questions are:

1. How does the establishment of national parks and protected areas threaten the livelihoods of indigenous
populations?
2. Explain what an ‘ecological footprint’ is and relate it to the concept of environmental justice.

needs to be cited with apa and intexts from any sources

additional file will be added to assist.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

qualitative methods

Locate a research article that uses one of the following qualitative methods that is appropriate to your research topic for your proposal. Search Library for an article that is no older than 5 years and from a scholarly nursing research journal.
1.Historical
2.Ethnography
3.Phenomenology
4.Grounded theory

Respond to the following:
a. Identify and define the qualitative method used.
b. Identify the data collection and analysis techniques used in the study.
c. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these techniques.
d. Evaluate the quality of the implications for theory building, practice, or knowledge developed in the study.

My research proposal is on diabetes -self management

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]

bioinfromatic

I have design a novel PCR primer to detect a unique gene that causes uropathogenic E.Coli. In this project i first worked with bioinfromatic to comapre three strains of E.coli to detect which one of them cause UPEC. Then i have selceted on of my gene to design a primer and then used PCR to run my sample and confirmed that my selected gene causes UPEC.

Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.

[order_calculator]